Legacies of British Imperialism in the Contemporary UK Asylum–Welfare Nexus
This article traces the imperial roots of the contemporary asylum–welfare nexus. It explores how English colonial governance exported Poor Law legislation firstly to colonial America (USA) and secondly to British North America (Canada). It argues that these three countries are an Anglophone shared m...
| Published in: | Social Sciences |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-09-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/10/432 |
| _version_ | 1850535989545533440 |
|---|---|
| author | Rachel Humphris |
| author_facet | Rachel Humphris |
| author_sort | Rachel Humphris |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Social Sciences |
| description | This article traces the imperial roots of the contemporary asylum–welfare nexus. It explores how English colonial governance exported Poor Law legislation firstly to colonial America (USA) and secondly to British North America (Canada). It argues that these three countries are an Anglophone shared moral space of law and governance, revealing the common unresolved contradictions underpinning contemporary debates about who ‘deserves’ entry, under what conditions, and why. Historical perspectives unsettle assumptions about the primacy of national geopolitical borders and the exceptionalism of contemporary migration. This article uses historical sociology to trace why and how national sovereignty took primacy over municipalities in controlling the mobility of people and the concomitant moral underpinnings. It then draws on new empirical research in three pioneering ‘sanctuary cities’ to explore how cities contest the entwining of welfare and migration governance. However, the article explores how these initiatives often reproduce justifications based on ‘deservingness’ and ‘contribution’. Through tracing the common threads that led to these forms of governance, we can understand they are not self-evident. A historical perspective allows us to ask different questions and open realms of alternative possibilities. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e85f14fad0944a8cbfa474fa941aaeb5 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2076-0760 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-e85f14fad0944a8cbfa474fa941aaeb52025-08-19T22:38:14ZengMDPI AGSocial Sciences2076-07602022-09-01111043210.3390/socsci11100432Legacies of British Imperialism in the Contemporary UK Asylum–Welfare NexusRachel Humphris0School of Politics and International Relations, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UKThis article traces the imperial roots of the contemporary asylum–welfare nexus. It explores how English colonial governance exported Poor Law legislation firstly to colonial America (USA) and secondly to British North America (Canada). It argues that these three countries are an Anglophone shared moral space of law and governance, revealing the common unresolved contradictions underpinning contemporary debates about who ‘deserves’ entry, under what conditions, and why. Historical perspectives unsettle assumptions about the primacy of national geopolitical borders and the exceptionalism of contemporary migration. This article uses historical sociology to trace why and how national sovereignty took primacy over municipalities in controlling the mobility of people and the concomitant moral underpinnings. It then draws on new empirical research in three pioneering ‘sanctuary cities’ to explore how cities contest the entwining of welfare and migration governance. However, the article explores how these initiatives often reproduce justifications based on ‘deservingness’ and ‘contribution’. Through tracing the common threads that led to these forms of governance, we can understand they are not self-evident. A historical perspective allows us to ask different questions and open realms of alternative possibilities.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/10/432migration policywelfarecolonial governancesettler-colonialismborderssanctuary cities |
| spellingShingle | Rachel Humphris Legacies of British Imperialism in the Contemporary UK Asylum–Welfare Nexus migration policy welfare colonial governance settler-colonialism borders sanctuary cities |
| title | Legacies of British Imperialism in the Contemporary UK Asylum–Welfare Nexus |
| title_full | Legacies of British Imperialism in the Contemporary UK Asylum–Welfare Nexus |
| title_fullStr | Legacies of British Imperialism in the Contemporary UK Asylum–Welfare Nexus |
| title_full_unstemmed | Legacies of British Imperialism in the Contemporary UK Asylum–Welfare Nexus |
| title_short | Legacies of British Imperialism in the Contemporary UK Asylum–Welfare Nexus |
| title_sort | legacies of british imperialism in the contemporary uk asylum welfare nexus |
| topic | migration policy welfare colonial governance settler-colonialism borders sanctuary cities |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/10/432 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rachelhumphris legaciesofbritishimperialisminthecontemporaryukasylumwelfarenexus |
