Put money where their mouth is? Willingness to pay for online conspiracy theory content

Many studies have examined why people believe in conspiracy theories, yet less is known about why people choose to consume conspiratorial content. This study addresses this gap by examining people's willingness to pay for online conspiracy theory content. Grounded in uses and gratifications the...

全面介紹

書目詳細資料
發表在:Telematics and Informatics Reports
Main Authors: John W. Cheng, Masaru Nishikawa, Ikuma Ogura, Nicholas A.R. Fraser
格式: Article
語言:英语
出版: Elsevier 2024-06-01
主題:
在線閱讀:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503024000276
_version_ 1850263972431790080
author John W. Cheng
Masaru Nishikawa
Ikuma Ogura
Nicholas A.R. Fraser
author_facet John W. Cheng
Masaru Nishikawa
Ikuma Ogura
Nicholas A.R. Fraser
author_sort John W. Cheng
collection DOAJ
container_title Telematics and Informatics Reports
description Many studies have examined why people believe in conspiracy theories, yet less is known about why people choose to consume conspiratorial content. This study addresses this gap by examining people's willingness to pay for online conspiracy theory content. Grounded in uses and gratifications theory and the willingness to pay concept, it employs a survey experiment fielded in Japan (n = 1,448) that asks respondents whether they would subscribe to a hypothetical online video channel with a randomly assigned conspiracy theory and a monthly subscription fee (0 to 1,000 JPY/∼9 USD). Results show that while many respondents held varying degrees of belief in the conspiracy theories in question, few were willing to pay for the channel and cost was the main determining factor. The subscription rate would drop from 19 % if the channel was free to 3–5 % if it had a non-zero subscription fee (average 324 JPY/∼3 USD). This study also finds that conspiracy mentality and media diet (the combination of using social media for news and avoiding mainstream media news) are consistent predictors of people's willingness to subscribe to and pay for online conspiracy theory content.
format Article
id doaj-art-e87c3dd08f2f4eccafbcf148d9bb3614
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2772-5030
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e87c3dd08f2f4eccafbcf148d9bb36142025-08-19T23:45:44ZengElsevierTelematics and Informatics Reports2772-50302024-06-011410014110.1016/j.teler.2024.100141Put money where their mouth is? Willingness to pay for online conspiracy theory contentJohn W. Cheng0Masaru Nishikawa1Ikuma Ogura2Nicholas A.R. Fraser3Department of English, College of Liberal Arts, Tsuda University; Corresponding author at: Department of English, College of Liberal Arts, Tsuda University, 2-1-1 Tsuda-machi, Kodaira-shi, Tokyo, Japan, 187-8577.Department of International and Cultural Studies, College of Liberal Arts, Tsuda UniversityGraduate School of Social Sciences, Hitotsubashi UniversityCanada Excellence Research Chair (CERC) in Migration and Integration, Toronto Metropolitan UniversityMany studies have examined why people believe in conspiracy theories, yet less is known about why people choose to consume conspiratorial content. This study addresses this gap by examining people's willingness to pay for online conspiracy theory content. Grounded in uses and gratifications theory and the willingness to pay concept, it employs a survey experiment fielded in Japan (n = 1,448) that asks respondents whether they would subscribe to a hypothetical online video channel with a randomly assigned conspiracy theory and a monthly subscription fee (0 to 1,000 JPY/∼9 USD). Results show that while many respondents held varying degrees of belief in the conspiracy theories in question, few were willing to pay for the channel and cost was the main determining factor. The subscription rate would drop from 19 % if the channel was free to 3–5 % if it had a non-zero subscription fee (average 324 JPY/∼3 USD). This study also finds that conspiracy mentality and media diet (the combination of using social media for news and avoiding mainstream media news) are consistent predictors of people's willingness to subscribe to and pay for online conspiracy theory content.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503024000276Conspiracy theory beliefConspiracy theoryOnline conspiracy theory contentUses and gratificationsWillingness to pay
spellingShingle John W. Cheng
Masaru Nishikawa
Ikuma Ogura
Nicholas A.R. Fraser
Put money where their mouth is? Willingness to pay for online conspiracy theory content
Conspiracy theory belief
Conspiracy theory
Online conspiracy theory content
Uses and gratifications
Willingness to pay
title Put money where their mouth is? Willingness to pay for online conspiracy theory content
title_full Put money where their mouth is? Willingness to pay for online conspiracy theory content
title_fullStr Put money where their mouth is? Willingness to pay for online conspiracy theory content
title_full_unstemmed Put money where their mouth is? Willingness to pay for online conspiracy theory content
title_short Put money where their mouth is? Willingness to pay for online conspiracy theory content
title_sort put money where their mouth is willingness to pay for online conspiracy theory content
topic Conspiracy theory belief
Conspiracy theory
Online conspiracy theory content
Uses and gratifications
Willingness to pay
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503024000276
work_keys_str_mv AT johnwcheng putmoneywheretheirmouthiswillingnesstopayforonlineconspiracytheorycontent
AT masarunishikawa putmoneywheretheirmouthiswillingnesstopayforonlineconspiracytheorycontent
AT ikumaogura putmoneywheretheirmouthiswillingnesstopayforonlineconspiracytheorycontent
AT nicholasarfraser putmoneywheretheirmouthiswillingnesstopayforonlineconspiracytheorycontent