Ethical and psychological implications of generative AI in digital afterlife technologies: A systematic literature review on responsible inclusive innovation
Rapid advances in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) have given birth to digital afterlife technologies (DeathTech), which enable the preservation of the voices, memories, and personalities of deceased individuals. This study is a systematic review of 45 scientific articles (2020–2025) using...
| Published in: | Journal of Responsible Technology |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2025-12-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659625000320 |
| _version_ | 1849266171576057856 |
|---|---|
| author | Mariyono Dwi |
| author_facet | Mariyono Dwi |
| author_sort | Mariyono Dwi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Journal of Responsible Technology |
| description | Rapid advances in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) have given birth to digital afterlife technologies (DeathTech), which enable the preservation of the voices, memories, and personalities of deceased individuals. This study is a systematic review of 45 scientific articles (2020–2025) using a thematic-SWOT analysis approach and the Responsible Inclusive Innovation (RII) framework, to explore how cultural schemas, inclusive design, and governance models influence the acceptance of DeathTech across cultures. Key findings suggest that ritual adaptation and spiritual meanings are critical to the acceptance of this technology. Jewish and Japanese communities show high acceptance through cultural integration, while Hindu and Luhya communities experience ontological dissonance. Design failures such as linguistic exclusion and ritual incongruence impact marginalized groups. In addition, regulatory gaps exist, especially in post-death privacy protection and algorithmic bias. This study proposes a triadic framework for the development of ethical and equitable DeathTech: cultural mediation, inclusive design, and pluralistic governance. This contribution enriches the study of digital thanatology and provides recommendations for culturally and socially sustainable innovation. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e899bc4e9ee84e2baa4cce18e6b47404 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2666-6596 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-12-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-e899bc4e9ee84e2baa4cce18e6b474042025-09-14T06:07:51ZengElsevierJournal of Responsible Technology2666-65962025-12-012410013610.1016/j.jrt.2025.100136Ethical and psychological implications of generative AI in digital afterlife technologies: A systematic literature review on responsible inclusive innovationMariyono Dwi0Faculty of Islamic Studies, Islamic University of Malang, IndonesiaRapid advances in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) have given birth to digital afterlife technologies (DeathTech), which enable the preservation of the voices, memories, and personalities of deceased individuals. This study is a systematic review of 45 scientific articles (2020–2025) using a thematic-SWOT analysis approach and the Responsible Inclusive Innovation (RII) framework, to explore how cultural schemas, inclusive design, and governance models influence the acceptance of DeathTech across cultures. Key findings suggest that ritual adaptation and spiritual meanings are critical to the acceptance of this technology. Jewish and Japanese communities show high acceptance through cultural integration, while Hindu and Luhya communities experience ontological dissonance. Design failures such as linguistic exclusion and ritual incongruence impact marginalized groups. In addition, regulatory gaps exist, especially in post-death privacy protection and algorithmic bias. This study proposes a triadic framework for the development of ethical and equitable DeathTech: cultural mediation, inclusive design, and pluralistic governance. This contribution enriches the study of digital thanatology and provides recommendations for culturally and socially sustainable innovation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659625000320Generative AIDigital afterlifeDeathTechCultural schemasInclusive designEthical governance |
| spellingShingle | Mariyono Dwi Ethical and psychological implications of generative AI in digital afterlife technologies: A systematic literature review on responsible inclusive innovation Generative AI Digital afterlife DeathTech Cultural schemas Inclusive design Ethical governance |
| title | Ethical and psychological implications of generative AI in digital afterlife technologies: A systematic literature review on responsible inclusive innovation |
| title_full | Ethical and psychological implications of generative AI in digital afterlife technologies: A systematic literature review on responsible inclusive innovation |
| title_fullStr | Ethical and psychological implications of generative AI in digital afterlife technologies: A systematic literature review on responsible inclusive innovation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Ethical and psychological implications of generative AI in digital afterlife technologies: A systematic literature review on responsible inclusive innovation |
| title_short | Ethical and psychological implications of generative AI in digital afterlife technologies: A systematic literature review on responsible inclusive innovation |
| title_sort | ethical and psychological implications of generative ai in digital afterlife technologies a systematic literature review on responsible inclusive innovation |
| topic | Generative AI Digital afterlife DeathTech Cultural schemas Inclusive design Ethical governance |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659625000320 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mariyonodwi ethicalandpsychologicalimplicationsofgenerativeaiindigitalafterlifetechnologiesasystematicliteraturereviewonresponsibleinclusiveinnovation |
