Comparing the Accuracy of Markerless Motion Analysis and Optoelectronic System for Measuring Gait Kinematics of Lower Limb

(1) Background: Marker-based optical motion tracking is the gold standard in gait analysis; however, markerless solutions are rapidly emerging today. Algorithms like Openpose can track human movement from a video. Few studies have assessed the validity of this method. This study aimed to assess the...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
出版年:Bioengineering
主要な著者: Luca Emanuele Molteni, Giuseppe Andreoni
フォーマット: 論文
言語:英語
出版事項: MDPI AG 2025-04-01
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/4/424
_version_ 1849858133364572160
author Luca Emanuele Molteni
Giuseppe Andreoni
author_facet Luca Emanuele Molteni
Giuseppe Andreoni
author_sort Luca Emanuele Molteni
collection DOAJ
container_title Bioengineering
description (1) Background: Marker-based optical motion tracking is the gold standard in gait analysis; however, markerless solutions are rapidly emerging today. Algorithms like Openpose can track human movement from a video. Few studies have assessed the validity of this method. This study aimed to assess the reliability of Openpose in measuring the kinematics and spatiotemporal gait parameters. (2) Methods: This analysis used simultaneously recorded video and optoelectronic motion capture data. We assessed 20 subjects with different gait impairments (healthy, right hemiplegia, left hemiplegia, paraparesis). The two methods were compared using computing absolute errors (AEs), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and cross-correlation coefficients (CCs) for normalized gait cycle joint angles. (3) Results: The spatiotemporal parameters showed an ICC between good to excellent, and the absolute error was very small: cadence AE = 1.63 step/min, Mean Velocity AE = 0.16 m/s. The Range of Motion (ROM) showed a good to excellent agreement in the sagittal plane. Furthermore, the normalized gait cycle CCC values indicated moderate to strong coupling in the sagittal plane. (4) Conclusions: We found Openpose to be accurate for sagittal plane gait kinematics and for spatiotemporal gait parameters in the healthy and pathological subjects assessed.
format Article
id doaj-art-e8d62090cab14a718369efdcfb7431a9
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2306-5354
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e8d62090cab14a718369efdcfb7431a92025-08-20T01:20:57ZengMDPI AGBioengineering2306-53542025-04-0112442410.3390/bioengineering12040424Comparing the Accuracy of Markerless Motion Analysis and Optoelectronic System for Measuring Gait Kinematics of Lower LimbLuca Emanuele Molteni0Giuseppe Andreoni1Scientific Institute IRCCS “E. Medea”, Bosisio Parini, 23842 Lecco, ItalyScientific Institute IRCCS “E. Medea”, Bosisio Parini, 23842 Lecco, Italy(1) Background: Marker-based optical motion tracking is the gold standard in gait analysis; however, markerless solutions are rapidly emerging today. Algorithms like Openpose can track human movement from a video. Few studies have assessed the validity of this method. This study aimed to assess the reliability of Openpose in measuring the kinematics and spatiotemporal gait parameters. (2) Methods: This analysis used simultaneously recorded video and optoelectronic motion capture data. We assessed 20 subjects with different gait impairments (healthy, right hemiplegia, left hemiplegia, paraparesis). The two methods were compared using computing absolute errors (AEs), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and cross-correlation coefficients (CCs) for normalized gait cycle joint angles. (3) Results: The spatiotemporal parameters showed an ICC between good to excellent, and the absolute error was very small: cadence AE = 1.63 step/min, Mean Velocity AE = 0.16 m/s. The Range of Motion (ROM) showed a good to excellent agreement in the sagittal plane. Furthermore, the normalized gait cycle CCC values indicated moderate to strong coupling in the sagittal plane. (4) Conclusions: We found Openpose to be accurate for sagittal plane gait kinematics and for spatiotemporal gait parameters in the healthy and pathological subjects assessed.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/4/424kinematicmarkerlessOpenposepediatric
spellingShingle Luca Emanuele Molteni
Giuseppe Andreoni
Comparing the Accuracy of Markerless Motion Analysis and Optoelectronic System for Measuring Gait Kinematics of Lower Limb
kinematic
markerless
Openpose
pediatric
title Comparing the Accuracy of Markerless Motion Analysis and Optoelectronic System for Measuring Gait Kinematics of Lower Limb
title_full Comparing the Accuracy of Markerless Motion Analysis and Optoelectronic System for Measuring Gait Kinematics of Lower Limb
title_fullStr Comparing the Accuracy of Markerless Motion Analysis and Optoelectronic System for Measuring Gait Kinematics of Lower Limb
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Accuracy of Markerless Motion Analysis and Optoelectronic System for Measuring Gait Kinematics of Lower Limb
title_short Comparing the Accuracy of Markerless Motion Analysis and Optoelectronic System for Measuring Gait Kinematics of Lower Limb
title_sort comparing the accuracy of markerless motion analysis and optoelectronic system for measuring gait kinematics of lower limb
topic kinematic
markerless
Openpose
pediatric
url https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/4/424
work_keys_str_mv AT lucaemanuelemolteni comparingtheaccuracyofmarkerlessmotionanalysisandoptoelectronicsystemformeasuringgaitkinematicsoflowerlimb
AT giuseppeandreoni comparingtheaccuracyofmarkerlessmotionanalysisandoptoelectronicsystemformeasuringgaitkinematicsoflowerlimb