Comparing the Accuracy of Markerless Motion Analysis and Optoelectronic System for Measuring Gait Kinematics of Lower Limb
(1) Background: Marker-based optical motion tracking is the gold standard in gait analysis; however, markerless solutions are rapidly emerging today. Algorithms like Openpose can track human movement from a video. Few studies have assessed the validity of this method. This study aimed to assess the...
| 出版年: | Bioengineering |
|---|---|
| 主要な著者: | , |
| フォーマット: | 論文 |
| 言語: | 英語 |
| 出版事項: |
MDPI AG
2025-04-01
|
| 主題: | |
| オンライン・アクセス: | https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/4/424 |
| _version_ | 1849858133364572160 |
|---|---|
| author | Luca Emanuele Molteni Giuseppe Andreoni |
| author_facet | Luca Emanuele Molteni Giuseppe Andreoni |
| author_sort | Luca Emanuele Molteni |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Bioengineering |
| description | (1) Background: Marker-based optical motion tracking is the gold standard in gait analysis; however, markerless solutions are rapidly emerging today. Algorithms like Openpose can track human movement from a video. Few studies have assessed the validity of this method. This study aimed to assess the reliability of Openpose in measuring the kinematics and spatiotemporal gait parameters. (2) Methods: This analysis used simultaneously recorded video and optoelectronic motion capture data. We assessed 20 subjects with different gait impairments (healthy, right hemiplegia, left hemiplegia, paraparesis). The two methods were compared using computing absolute errors (AEs), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and cross-correlation coefficients (CCs) for normalized gait cycle joint angles. (3) Results: The spatiotemporal parameters showed an ICC between good to excellent, and the absolute error was very small: cadence AE = 1.63 step/min, Mean Velocity AE = 0.16 m/s. The Range of Motion (ROM) showed a good to excellent agreement in the sagittal plane. Furthermore, the normalized gait cycle CCC values indicated moderate to strong coupling in the sagittal plane. (4) Conclusions: We found Openpose to be accurate for sagittal plane gait kinematics and for spatiotemporal gait parameters in the healthy and pathological subjects assessed. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e8d62090cab14a718369efdcfb7431a9 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2306-5354 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-e8d62090cab14a718369efdcfb7431a92025-08-20T01:20:57ZengMDPI AGBioengineering2306-53542025-04-0112442410.3390/bioengineering12040424Comparing the Accuracy of Markerless Motion Analysis and Optoelectronic System for Measuring Gait Kinematics of Lower LimbLuca Emanuele Molteni0Giuseppe Andreoni1Scientific Institute IRCCS “E. Medea”, Bosisio Parini, 23842 Lecco, ItalyScientific Institute IRCCS “E. Medea”, Bosisio Parini, 23842 Lecco, Italy(1) Background: Marker-based optical motion tracking is the gold standard in gait analysis; however, markerless solutions are rapidly emerging today. Algorithms like Openpose can track human movement from a video. Few studies have assessed the validity of this method. This study aimed to assess the reliability of Openpose in measuring the kinematics and spatiotemporal gait parameters. (2) Methods: This analysis used simultaneously recorded video and optoelectronic motion capture data. We assessed 20 subjects with different gait impairments (healthy, right hemiplegia, left hemiplegia, paraparesis). The two methods were compared using computing absolute errors (AEs), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and cross-correlation coefficients (CCs) for normalized gait cycle joint angles. (3) Results: The spatiotemporal parameters showed an ICC between good to excellent, and the absolute error was very small: cadence AE = 1.63 step/min, Mean Velocity AE = 0.16 m/s. The Range of Motion (ROM) showed a good to excellent agreement in the sagittal plane. Furthermore, the normalized gait cycle CCC values indicated moderate to strong coupling in the sagittal plane. (4) Conclusions: We found Openpose to be accurate for sagittal plane gait kinematics and for spatiotemporal gait parameters in the healthy and pathological subjects assessed.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/4/424kinematicmarkerlessOpenposepediatric |
| spellingShingle | Luca Emanuele Molteni Giuseppe Andreoni Comparing the Accuracy of Markerless Motion Analysis and Optoelectronic System for Measuring Gait Kinematics of Lower Limb kinematic markerless Openpose pediatric |
| title | Comparing the Accuracy of Markerless Motion Analysis and Optoelectronic System for Measuring Gait Kinematics of Lower Limb |
| title_full | Comparing the Accuracy of Markerless Motion Analysis and Optoelectronic System for Measuring Gait Kinematics of Lower Limb |
| title_fullStr | Comparing the Accuracy of Markerless Motion Analysis and Optoelectronic System for Measuring Gait Kinematics of Lower Limb |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the Accuracy of Markerless Motion Analysis and Optoelectronic System for Measuring Gait Kinematics of Lower Limb |
| title_short | Comparing the Accuracy of Markerless Motion Analysis and Optoelectronic System for Measuring Gait Kinematics of Lower Limb |
| title_sort | comparing the accuracy of markerless motion analysis and optoelectronic system for measuring gait kinematics of lower limb |
| topic | kinematic markerless Openpose pediatric |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/4/424 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lucaemanuelemolteni comparingtheaccuracyofmarkerlessmotionanalysisandoptoelectronicsystemformeasuringgaitkinematicsoflowerlimb AT giuseppeandreoni comparingtheaccuracyofmarkerlessmotionanalysisandoptoelectronicsystemformeasuringgaitkinematicsoflowerlimb |
