The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis

Abstract Background This meta-analysis was designed to compare the safety and efficiency of remimazolam with those of propofol in patients undergoing gastroscope sedation. Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid, Wanfang Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SINOMED,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC Anesthesiology
Main Authors: Xincan An, Tianqi Shen, Xingxing Yin, Jin Xu, Yongming Zhang, Tianlong Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-01-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02422-y
_version_ 1850370083064381440
author Xincan An
Tianqi Shen
Xingxing Yin
Jin Xu
Yongming Zhang
Tianlong Wang
author_facet Xincan An
Tianqi Shen
Xingxing Yin
Jin Xu
Yongming Zhang
Tianlong Wang
author_sort Xincan An
collection DOAJ
container_title BMC Anesthesiology
description Abstract Background This meta-analysis was designed to compare the safety and efficiency of remimazolam with those of propofol in patients undergoing gastroscope sedation. Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid, Wanfang Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SINOMED, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies that reported on remimazolam versus propofol for gastroscope sedation from establishment to February 25, 2023. The sedative efficiency and the incidence of adverse events were assessed as outcomes. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17 were used to perform all statistical analyses. Results A total of 26 randomized controlled trials involving 3,641 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that remimazolam had a significantly lower incidence of respiratory depression (risk ratio [RR] = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28–0.57; p < 0.01, GRADE high), hypoxemia (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23–0.49; p < 0.01, GRADE high), bradycardia (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23–0.51; p < 0.01, GRADE high), dizziness (RR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.31–0.65; p < 0.01, GRADE high), injection site pain (RR = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.03–0.13; p < 0.01, GRADE high), nausea or vomiting (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62–1.00; p = 0.05, GRADE moderate), and hypotension (RR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.26–0.48; p < 0.01, GRADE low). Conclusions Remimazolam can be used safely in gastroscopic sedation and reduces the incidence of respiratory depression, hypoxemia, bradycardia, injection site pain, and dizziness compared with propofol, and doesn't increase the incidence of nausea and vomiting.
format Article
id doaj-art-e955b70571bb4439a80dba3a434cc593
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1471-2253
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e955b70571bb4439a80dba3a434cc5932025-08-19T23:01:44ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532024-01-0124111210.1186/s12871-024-02422-yThe safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysisXincan An0Tianqi Shen1Xingxing Yin2Jin Xu3Yongming Zhang4Tianlong Wang5Department of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, 984th Hospital of the People’s Liberation ArmyDepartment of Anesthesiology, 984th Hospital of the People’s Liberation ArmyDepartment of Education, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, 984th Hospital of the People’s Liberation ArmyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityAbstract Background This meta-analysis was designed to compare the safety and efficiency of remimazolam with those of propofol in patients undergoing gastroscope sedation. Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid, Wanfang Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SINOMED, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies that reported on remimazolam versus propofol for gastroscope sedation from establishment to February 25, 2023. The sedative efficiency and the incidence of adverse events were assessed as outcomes. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17 were used to perform all statistical analyses. Results A total of 26 randomized controlled trials involving 3,641 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that remimazolam had a significantly lower incidence of respiratory depression (risk ratio [RR] = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28–0.57; p < 0.01, GRADE high), hypoxemia (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23–0.49; p < 0.01, GRADE high), bradycardia (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23–0.51; p < 0.01, GRADE high), dizziness (RR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.31–0.65; p < 0.01, GRADE high), injection site pain (RR = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.03–0.13; p < 0.01, GRADE high), nausea or vomiting (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62–1.00; p = 0.05, GRADE moderate), and hypotension (RR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.26–0.48; p < 0.01, GRADE low). Conclusions Remimazolam can be used safely in gastroscopic sedation and reduces the incidence of respiratory depression, hypoxemia, bradycardia, injection site pain, and dizziness compared with propofol, and doesn't increase the incidence of nausea and vomiting.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02422-yRemimazolamPropofolGastroscopic sedationMeta-analysis
spellingShingle Xincan An
Tianqi Shen
Xingxing Yin
Jin Xu
Yongming Zhang
Tianlong Wang
The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis
Remimazolam
Propofol
Gastroscopic sedation
Meta-analysis
title The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis
title_full The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis
title_short The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis
title_sort safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation a meta analysis
topic Remimazolam
Propofol
Gastroscopic sedation
Meta-analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02422-y
work_keys_str_mv AT xincanan thesafetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis
AT tianqishen thesafetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis
AT xingxingyin thesafetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis
AT jinxu thesafetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis
AT yongmingzhang thesafetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis
AT tianlongwang thesafetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis
AT xincanan safetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis
AT tianqishen safetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis
AT xingxingyin safetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis
AT jinxu safetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis
AT yongmingzhang safetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis
AT tianlongwang safetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis