The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis
Abstract Background This meta-analysis was designed to compare the safety and efficiency of remimazolam with those of propofol in patients undergoing gastroscope sedation. Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid, Wanfang Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SINOMED,...
| Published in: | BMC Anesthesiology |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2024-01-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02422-y |
| _version_ | 1850370083064381440 |
|---|---|
| author | Xincan An Tianqi Shen Xingxing Yin Jin Xu Yongming Zhang Tianlong Wang |
| author_facet | Xincan An Tianqi Shen Xingxing Yin Jin Xu Yongming Zhang Tianlong Wang |
| author_sort | Xincan An |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | BMC Anesthesiology |
| description | Abstract Background This meta-analysis was designed to compare the safety and efficiency of remimazolam with those of propofol in patients undergoing gastroscope sedation. Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid, Wanfang Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SINOMED, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies that reported on remimazolam versus propofol for gastroscope sedation from establishment to February 25, 2023. The sedative efficiency and the incidence of adverse events were assessed as outcomes. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17 were used to perform all statistical analyses. Results A total of 26 randomized controlled trials involving 3,641 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that remimazolam had a significantly lower incidence of respiratory depression (risk ratio [RR] = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28–0.57; p < 0.01, GRADE high), hypoxemia (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23–0.49; p < 0.01, GRADE high), bradycardia (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23–0.51; p < 0.01, GRADE high), dizziness (RR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.31–0.65; p < 0.01, GRADE high), injection site pain (RR = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.03–0.13; p < 0.01, GRADE high), nausea or vomiting (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62–1.00; p = 0.05, GRADE moderate), and hypotension (RR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.26–0.48; p < 0.01, GRADE low). Conclusions Remimazolam can be used safely in gastroscopic sedation and reduces the incidence of respiratory depression, hypoxemia, bradycardia, injection site pain, and dizziness compared with propofol, and doesn't increase the incidence of nausea and vomiting. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e955b70571bb4439a80dba3a434cc593 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 1471-2253 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-e955b70571bb4439a80dba3a434cc5932025-08-19T23:01:44ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532024-01-0124111210.1186/s12871-024-02422-yThe safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysisXincan An0Tianqi Shen1Xingxing Yin2Jin Xu3Yongming Zhang4Tianlong Wang5Department of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, 984th Hospital of the People’s Liberation ArmyDepartment of Anesthesiology, 984th Hospital of the People’s Liberation ArmyDepartment of Education, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, 984th Hospital of the People’s Liberation ArmyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityAbstract Background This meta-analysis was designed to compare the safety and efficiency of remimazolam with those of propofol in patients undergoing gastroscope sedation. Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid, Wanfang Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SINOMED, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies that reported on remimazolam versus propofol for gastroscope sedation from establishment to February 25, 2023. The sedative efficiency and the incidence of adverse events were assessed as outcomes. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17 were used to perform all statistical analyses. Results A total of 26 randomized controlled trials involving 3,641 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that remimazolam had a significantly lower incidence of respiratory depression (risk ratio [RR] = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28–0.57; p < 0.01, GRADE high), hypoxemia (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23–0.49; p < 0.01, GRADE high), bradycardia (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23–0.51; p < 0.01, GRADE high), dizziness (RR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.31–0.65; p < 0.01, GRADE high), injection site pain (RR = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.03–0.13; p < 0.01, GRADE high), nausea or vomiting (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62–1.00; p = 0.05, GRADE moderate), and hypotension (RR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.26–0.48; p < 0.01, GRADE low). Conclusions Remimazolam can be used safely in gastroscopic sedation and reduces the incidence of respiratory depression, hypoxemia, bradycardia, injection site pain, and dizziness compared with propofol, and doesn't increase the incidence of nausea and vomiting.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02422-yRemimazolamPropofolGastroscopic sedationMeta-analysis |
| spellingShingle | Xincan An Tianqi Shen Xingxing Yin Jin Xu Yongming Zhang Tianlong Wang The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis Remimazolam Propofol Gastroscopic sedation Meta-analysis |
| title | The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis |
| title_full | The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis |
| title_fullStr | The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis |
| title_short | The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis |
| title_sort | safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation a meta analysis |
| topic | Remimazolam Propofol Gastroscopic sedation Meta-analysis |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02422-y |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT xincanan thesafetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis AT tianqishen thesafetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis AT xingxingyin thesafetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis AT jinxu thesafetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis AT yongmingzhang thesafetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis AT tianlongwang thesafetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis AT xincanan safetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis AT tianqishen safetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis AT xingxingyin safetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis AT jinxu safetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis AT yongmingzhang safetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis AT tianlongwang safetyofremimazolamversuspropofolingastroscopicsedationametaanalysis |
