The tumor burden score may be a discriminator in microwave ablation versus liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting study

PurposeThis study aims to compare the prognostic outcome of resection (RES) and microwave ablation (MWA) in different tumor burden score (TBS) cohorts.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 479 patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent RES (n = 329) or MWA (n = 150)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Oncology
Main Authors: Zeyuan Wei, Kailing Xie, Feng Xu, Chaoliu Dai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-02-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1330851/full
_version_ 1850116051330662400
author Zeyuan Wei
Zeyuan Wei
Kailing Xie
Kailing Xie
Feng Xu
Feng Xu
Chaoliu Dai
Chaoliu Dai
author_facet Zeyuan Wei
Zeyuan Wei
Kailing Xie
Kailing Xie
Feng Xu
Feng Xu
Chaoliu Dai
Chaoliu Dai
author_sort Zeyuan Wei
collection DOAJ
container_title Frontiers in Oncology
description PurposeThis study aims to compare the prognostic outcome of resection (RES) and microwave ablation (MWA) in different tumor burden score (TBS) cohorts.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 479 patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent RES (n = 329) or MWA (n = 150) with curative intent at our institution. We assessed their overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using the Kaplan–Meier curve. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to minimize selection and confounding biases. Multivariate Cox regression was used to define the association between surgical modalities and outcomes.ResultsFollowing PSM, in the TBS ≤3 cohort, the cumulative 1-, 3-, 5- year OS in the RES and MWA groups were 92.5% vs. 98.8%, 82.7% vs. 90.0%, and 82.7% vs. 83.2% (P = 0.366), respectively. The corresponding PFS rates in the RES and MWA groups were 82.7% vs. 88.0%, 63.6% vs. 68.3% and 55.2% vs. 56.3, respectively (P = 0.218). In the TBS >3 cohort, the cumulative 1-, 3-, 5- year OS between the RES and MWA groups were 92.5% vs. 95.0%, 82.8% vs. 73.2% and 76.3% vs. 55.1%, (P = 0.034), respectively. The corresponding PFS rates in the RES and MWA groups were 78.0% vs. 67.5%, 63.6% vs. 37.5% and 55.2% vs. 37.1%, respectively (P = 0.044). The IPTW analysis showed similar results as shown in PSM analysis. The multivariate Cox regression indicated that the type of surgical modality was not associated with a poorer prognostic outcome in the TBS ≤3 cohort, unlike in the TBS >3 cohort.ConclusionTBS, as a discriminator, might help guide treatment decision-making for HCC within the Milan criteria.
format Article
id doaj-art-e960299847c243dfb4c2633883d2fd48
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2234-943X
language English
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e960299847c243dfb4c2633883d2fd482025-08-19T23:57:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2024-02-011410.3389/fonc.2024.13308511330851The tumor burden score may be a discriminator in microwave ablation versus liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting studyZeyuan Wei0Zeyuan Wei1Kailing Xie2Kailing Xie3Feng Xu4Feng Xu5Chaoliu Dai6Chaoliu Dai7Department of Hepatobiliary and Splenic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, ChinaDepartment of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, ChinaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Splenic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, ChinaDepartment of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, ChinaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Splenic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, ChinaDepartment of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, ChinaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Splenic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, ChinaDepartment of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, ChinaPurposeThis study aims to compare the prognostic outcome of resection (RES) and microwave ablation (MWA) in different tumor burden score (TBS) cohorts.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 479 patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent RES (n = 329) or MWA (n = 150) with curative intent at our institution. We assessed their overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using the Kaplan–Meier curve. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to minimize selection and confounding biases. Multivariate Cox regression was used to define the association between surgical modalities and outcomes.ResultsFollowing PSM, in the TBS ≤3 cohort, the cumulative 1-, 3-, 5- year OS in the RES and MWA groups were 92.5% vs. 98.8%, 82.7% vs. 90.0%, and 82.7% vs. 83.2% (P = 0.366), respectively. The corresponding PFS rates in the RES and MWA groups were 82.7% vs. 88.0%, 63.6% vs. 68.3% and 55.2% vs. 56.3, respectively (P = 0.218). In the TBS >3 cohort, the cumulative 1-, 3-, 5- year OS between the RES and MWA groups were 92.5% vs. 95.0%, 82.8% vs. 73.2% and 76.3% vs. 55.1%, (P = 0.034), respectively. The corresponding PFS rates in the RES and MWA groups were 78.0% vs. 67.5%, 63.6% vs. 37.5% and 55.2% vs. 37.1%, respectively (P = 0.044). The IPTW analysis showed similar results as shown in PSM analysis. The multivariate Cox regression indicated that the type of surgical modality was not associated with a poorer prognostic outcome in the TBS ≤3 cohort, unlike in the TBS >3 cohort.ConclusionTBS, as a discriminator, might help guide treatment decision-making for HCC within the Milan criteria.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1330851/fullliver resectionmicrowave ablationhepatocellular carcinomatumor burden scoreprognosis
spellingShingle Zeyuan Wei
Zeyuan Wei
Kailing Xie
Kailing Xie
Feng Xu
Feng Xu
Chaoliu Dai
Chaoliu Dai
The tumor burden score may be a discriminator in microwave ablation versus liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting study
liver resection
microwave ablation
hepatocellular carcinoma
tumor burden score
prognosis
title The tumor burden score may be a discriminator in microwave ablation versus liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting study
title_full The tumor burden score may be a discriminator in microwave ablation versus liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting study
title_fullStr The tumor burden score may be a discriminator in microwave ablation versus liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting study
title_full_unstemmed The tumor burden score may be a discriminator in microwave ablation versus liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting study
title_short The tumor burden score may be a discriminator in microwave ablation versus liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting study
title_sort tumor burden score may be a discriminator in microwave ablation versus liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the milan criteria a propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting study
topic liver resection
microwave ablation
hepatocellular carcinoma
tumor burden score
prognosis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1330851/full
work_keys_str_mv AT zeyuanwei thetumorburdenscoremaybeadiscriminatorinmicrowaveablationversusliverresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomawithinthemilancriteriaapropensityscorematchingandinverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingstudy
AT zeyuanwei thetumorburdenscoremaybeadiscriminatorinmicrowaveablationversusliverresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomawithinthemilancriteriaapropensityscorematchingandinverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingstudy
AT kailingxie thetumorburdenscoremaybeadiscriminatorinmicrowaveablationversusliverresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomawithinthemilancriteriaapropensityscorematchingandinverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingstudy
AT kailingxie thetumorburdenscoremaybeadiscriminatorinmicrowaveablationversusliverresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomawithinthemilancriteriaapropensityscorematchingandinverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingstudy
AT fengxu thetumorburdenscoremaybeadiscriminatorinmicrowaveablationversusliverresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomawithinthemilancriteriaapropensityscorematchingandinverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingstudy
AT fengxu thetumorburdenscoremaybeadiscriminatorinmicrowaveablationversusliverresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomawithinthemilancriteriaapropensityscorematchingandinverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingstudy
AT chaoliudai thetumorburdenscoremaybeadiscriminatorinmicrowaveablationversusliverresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomawithinthemilancriteriaapropensityscorematchingandinverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingstudy
AT chaoliudai thetumorburdenscoremaybeadiscriminatorinmicrowaveablationversusliverresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomawithinthemilancriteriaapropensityscorematchingandinverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingstudy
AT zeyuanwei tumorburdenscoremaybeadiscriminatorinmicrowaveablationversusliverresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomawithinthemilancriteriaapropensityscorematchingandinverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingstudy
AT zeyuanwei tumorburdenscoremaybeadiscriminatorinmicrowaveablationversusliverresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomawithinthemilancriteriaapropensityscorematchingandinverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingstudy
AT kailingxie tumorburdenscoremaybeadiscriminatorinmicrowaveablationversusliverresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomawithinthemilancriteriaapropensityscorematchingandinverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingstudy
AT kailingxie tumorburdenscoremaybeadiscriminatorinmicrowaveablationversusliverresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomawithinthemilancriteriaapropensityscorematchingandinverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingstudy
AT fengxu tumorburdenscoremaybeadiscriminatorinmicrowaveablationversusliverresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomawithinthemilancriteriaapropensityscorematchingandinverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingstudy
AT fengxu tumorburdenscoremaybeadiscriminatorinmicrowaveablationversusliverresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomawithinthemilancriteriaapropensityscorematchingandinverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingstudy
AT chaoliudai tumorburdenscoremaybeadiscriminatorinmicrowaveablationversusliverresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomawithinthemilancriteriaapropensityscorematchingandinverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingstudy
AT chaoliudai tumorburdenscoremaybeadiscriminatorinmicrowaveablationversusliverresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomawithinthemilancriteriaapropensityscorematchingandinverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingstudy