Comparative Study of DNA Barcoding and Mini-Barcoding based on COI Gene for Species Identification and Phylogeny of Formicidae Family (Insecta: Hymenoptera)

DNA barcoding and mini-barcoding are widely used to study insect biodiversity, including ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). This study evaluated the effectiveness of both approaches for species identification and phylogenetic inference in ants, with particular attention to the performance of universal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hayati Journal of Biosciences
Main Authors: Beivy Jonathan Kolondam, Trina Ekawati Tallei, Roni Koneri, Juliet Merry Eva Mamahit
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bogor Agricultural University 2025-09-01
Online Access:https://journal.ipb.ac.id/hayati/article/view/64418
_version_ 1849326739939917824
author Beivy Jonathan Kolondam
Trina Ekawati Tallei
Roni Koneri
Juliet Merry Eva Mamahit
author_facet Beivy Jonathan Kolondam
Trina Ekawati Tallei
Roni Koneri
Juliet Merry Eva Mamahit
author_sort Beivy Jonathan Kolondam
collection DOAJ
container_title Hayati Journal of Biosciences
description DNA barcoding and mini-barcoding are widely used to study insect biodiversity, including ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). This study evaluated the effectiveness of both approaches for species identification and phylogenetic inference in ants, with particular attention to the performance of universal primers during PCR amplification. Full-length DNA barcode (658 bp) and mini-barcode (127 bp) regions of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene were retrieved from GenBank, aligned, and analysed with maximum-likelihood phylogenetics (1,000 bootstrap replicates) under the Tamura-Nei model. The universal DNA barcoding primers (Folmer's LCO1490 and HCO2198) showed generally good alignment with ant COI sequences. However, multiple nucleotide mismatches were observed in LCO1490, including one critical mismatch located within the GC clamp region. In contrast, the universal mini-barcoding primers (UniMinibarF1 and UniMinibarR1) showed critical mismatches at their 3′ ends, likely reducing PCR efficiency. Despite limitations associated with primer mismatches, both DNA barcoding and mini-barcoding are reliable for species identification. DNA barcoding and mini barcoding are both capable of distinguishing ants at the species level, regardless of the length of the sequences being compared. The same sequences have also been used for phylogenetic analysis, showing good ability to distinguish ant species based on phylogenetic tree reconstruction. The comparison of DNA barcoding and mini-barcoding in ants showed that longer sequences offered superior resolution for species identification and phylogenetic reconstruction. These findings underscore the need for primer optimisation in ant-specific applications and highlight the utility of both barcoding strategies for taxonomic and evolutionary studies.
format Article
id doaj-art-eaaa6d58b0514819adf2229f2e47c030
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1978-3019
2086-4094
language English
publishDate 2025-09-01
publisher Bogor Agricultural University
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-eaaa6d58b0514819adf2229f2e47c0302025-09-01T05:27:47ZengBogor Agricultural UniversityHayati Journal of Biosciences1978-30192086-40942025-09-0132610.4308/hjb.32.6.1626-1642Comparative Study of DNA Barcoding and Mini-Barcoding based on COI Gene for Species Identification and Phylogeny of Formicidae Family (Insecta: Hymenoptera)Beivy Jonathan Kolondam0Trina Ekawati Tallei1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7963-7527Roni Koneri2Juliet Merry Eva Mamahit3Doctoral Program of Entomology, Postgraduate Program, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado 95115, IndonesiaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado 95115, IndonesiaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado 95115, IndonesiaDoctoral Program of Entomology, Postgraduate Program, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado 95115, Indonesia DNA barcoding and mini-barcoding are widely used to study insect biodiversity, including ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). This study evaluated the effectiveness of both approaches for species identification and phylogenetic inference in ants, with particular attention to the performance of universal primers during PCR amplification. Full-length DNA barcode (658 bp) and mini-barcode (127 bp) regions of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene were retrieved from GenBank, aligned, and analysed with maximum-likelihood phylogenetics (1,000 bootstrap replicates) under the Tamura-Nei model. The universal DNA barcoding primers (Folmer's LCO1490 and HCO2198) showed generally good alignment with ant COI sequences. However, multiple nucleotide mismatches were observed in LCO1490, including one critical mismatch located within the GC clamp region. In contrast, the universal mini-barcoding primers (UniMinibarF1 and UniMinibarR1) showed critical mismatches at their 3′ ends, likely reducing PCR efficiency. Despite limitations associated with primer mismatches, both DNA barcoding and mini-barcoding are reliable for species identification. DNA barcoding and mini barcoding are both capable of distinguishing ants at the species level, regardless of the length of the sequences being compared. The same sequences have also been used for phylogenetic analysis, showing good ability to distinguish ant species based on phylogenetic tree reconstruction. The comparison of DNA barcoding and mini-barcoding in ants showed that longer sequences offered superior resolution for species identification and phylogenetic reconstruction. These findings underscore the need for primer optimisation in ant-specific applications and highlight the utility of both barcoding strategies for taxonomic and evolutionary studies. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/hayati/article/view/64418
spellingShingle Beivy Jonathan Kolondam
Trina Ekawati Tallei
Roni Koneri
Juliet Merry Eva Mamahit
Comparative Study of DNA Barcoding and Mini-Barcoding based on COI Gene for Species Identification and Phylogeny of Formicidae Family (Insecta: Hymenoptera)
title Comparative Study of DNA Barcoding and Mini-Barcoding based on COI Gene for Species Identification and Phylogeny of Formicidae Family (Insecta: Hymenoptera)
title_full Comparative Study of DNA Barcoding and Mini-Barcoding based on COI Gene for Species Identification and Phylogeny of Formicidae Family (Insecta: Hymenoptera)
title_fullStr Comparative Study of DNA Barcoding and Mini-Barcoding based on COI Gene for Species Identification and Phylogeny of Formicidae Family (Insecta: Hymenoptera)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of DNA Barcoding and Mini-Barcoding based on COI Gene for Species Identification and Phylogeny of Formicidae Family (Insecta: Hymenoptera)
title_short Comparative Study of DNA Barcoding and Mini-Barcoding based on COI Gene for Species Identification and Phylogeny of Formicidae Family (Insecta: Hymenoptera)
title_sort comparative study of dna barcoding and mini barcoding based on coi gene for species identification and phylogeny of formicidae family insecta hymenoptera
url https://journal.ipb.ac.id/hayati/article/view/64418
work_keys_str_mv AT beivyjonathankolondam comparativestudyofdnabarcodingandminibarcodingbasedoncoigeneforspeciesidentificationandphylogenyofformicidaefamilyinsectahymenoptera
AT trinaekawatitallei comparativestudyofdnabarcodingandminibarcodingbasedoncoigeneforspeciesidentificationandphylogenyofformicidaefamilyinsectahymenoptera
AT ronikoneri comparativestudyofdnabarcodingandminibarcodingbasedoncoigeneforspeciesidentificationandphylogenyofformicidaefamilyinsectahymenoptera
AT julietmerryevamamahit comparativestudyofdnabarcodingandminibarcodingbasedoncoigeneforspeciesidentificationandphylogenyofformicidaefamilyinsectahymenoptera