Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population

Abstract Background Physical end emotional changes during pregnancy may not only affect pregnant womens’ quality of life, but also how instruments assessing quality of life perform in such populations. To date, there is insufficient evidence on psychometric properties for both generic and condition-...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
出版年:Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
主要な著者: Elisabet Rondung, Sandra Oliveira, Francisco Esteves
フォーマット: 論文
言語:英語
出版事項: BMC 2023-08-01
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02166-2
_version_ 1850422103886528512
author Elisabet Rondung
Sandra Oliveira
Francisco Esteves
author_facet Elisabet Rondung
Sandra Oliveira
Francisco Esteves
author_sort Elisabet Rondung
collection DOAJ
container_title Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
description Abstract Background Physical end emotional changes during pregnancy may not only affect pregnant womens’ quality of life, but also how instruments assessing quality of life perform in such populations. To date, there is insufficient evidence on psychometric properties for both generic and condition-specific instruments measuring quality of life during pregnancy. The aim of this study was thus to examine the structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity of the WHOQOL-BREF in a sample of pregnant women. Methods A convenience sample of 1015 pregnant women in Sweden completed the WHOQOL-BREF online. We examined the psychometric properties of the instrument using principal component analysis (PCA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach’s alpha, item-domain correlations, correlations with overall QOL and general health, and multiple linear regression with items on overall QOL and general health as outcomes. Results Principal Component Analysis in a random subsample (n = 502) supported a four-factor model, encompassing the domains physical, psychological, social and environmental quality of life, but with four of the items originally in the environmental domain relocated to the other domains. The proposed domain structure showed good fit in confirmatory factor analysis in the other random subsample (n = 513). The physical and psychological domains showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.885 and 0.826 respectively), while the social and environmental domains were weaker in this regard. All domains showed significant positive correlations with items on overall QOL and general health. The physical and psychological domains were the most evident predictors in the regression models. Conclusions We find the Swedish version of the WHOQOL-BREF to have good psychometric properties to be used in samples of pregnant women, and propose an alternative domain structure that might be even more useful for assessing quality of life during pregnancy. The physical and psychological domains showed good internal consistency and construct validity.
format Article
id doaj-art-eaec321a42f442c3bd10eea018f2c68c
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1477-7525
language English
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-eaec321a42f442c3bd10eea018f2c68c2025-08-19T22:42:05ZengBMCHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes1477-75252023-08-0121111110.1186/s12955-023-02166-2Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant populationElisabet Rondung0Sandra Oliveira1Francisco Esteves2Department of Psychology and Social Work, Mid Sweden UniversityFaculdade de Ciências Humanas, Católica Research Centre for Psychological, Family, and Social Wellbeing, Universidade Católica PortuguesaDepartment of Psychology and Social Work, Mid Sweden UniversityAbstract Background Physical end emotional changes during pregnancy may not only affect pregnant womens’ quality of life, but also how instruments assessing quality of life perform in such populations. To date, there is insufficient evidence on psychometric properties for both generic and condition-specific instruments measuring quality of life during pregnancy. The aim of this study was thus to examine the structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity of the WHOQOL-BREF in a sample of pregnant women. Methods A convenience sample of 1015 pregnant women in Sweden completed the WHOQOL-BREF online. We examined the psychometric properties of the instrument using principal component analysis (PCA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach’s alpha, item-domain correlations, correlations with overall QOL and general health, and multiple linear regression with items on overall QOL and general health as outcomes. Results Principal Component Analysis in a random subsample (n = 502) supported a four-factor model, encompassing the domains physical, psychological, social and environmental quality of life, but with four of the items originally in the environmental domain relocated to the other domains. The proposed domain structure showed good fit in confirmatory factor analysis in the other random subsample (n = 513). The physical and psychological domains showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.885 and 0.826 respectively), while the social and environmental domains were weaker in this regard. All domains showed significant positive correlations with items on overall QOL and general health. The physical and psychological domains were the most evident predictors in the regression models. Conclusions We find the Swedish version of the WHOQOL-BREF to have good psychometric properties to be used in samples of pregnant women, and propose an alternative domain structure that might be even more useful for assessing quality of life during pregnancy. The physical and psychological domains showed good internal consistency and construct validity.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02166-2Quality of lifeWHOQOL-BREFPregnancyWomenValidityConfirmatory factor analysis
spellingShingle Elisabet Rondung
Sandra Oliveira
Francisco Esteves
Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population
Quality of life
WHOQOL-BREF
Pregnancy
Women
Validity
Confirmatory factor analysis
title Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population
title_full Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population
title_short Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population
title_sort validity and reliability of the whoqol bref in a pregnant population
topic Quality of life
WHOQOL-BREF
Pregnancy
Women
Validity
Confirmatory factor analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02166-2
work_keys_str_mv AT elisabetrondung validityandreliabilityofthewhoqolbrefinapregnantpopulation
AT sandraoliveira validityandreliabilityofthewhoqolbrefinapregnantpopulation
AT franciscoesteves validityandreliabilityofthewhoqolbrefinapregnantpopulation