Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population
Abstract Background Physical end emotional changes during pregnancy may not only affect pregnant womens’ quality of life, but also how instruments assessing quality of life perform in such populations. To date, there is insufficient evidence on psychometric properties for both generic and condition-...
| 出版年: | Health and Quality of Life Outcomes |
|---|---|
| 主要な著者: | , , |
| フォーマット: | 論文 |
| 言語: | 英語 |
| 出版事項: |
BMC
2023-08-01
|
| 主題: | |
| オンライン・アクセス: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02166-2 |
| _version_ | 1850422103886528512 |
|---|---|
| author | Elisabet Rondung Sandra Oliveira Francisco Esteves |
| author_facet | Elisabet Rondung Sandra Oliveira Francisco Esteves |
| author_sort | Elisabet Rondung |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Health and Quality of Life Outcomes |
| description | Abstract Background Physical end emotional changes during pregnancy may not only affect pregnant womens’ quality of life, but also how instruments assessing quality of life perform in such populations. To date, there is insufficient evidence on psychometric properties for both generic and condition-specific instruments measuring quality of life during pregnancy. The aim of this study was thus to examine the structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity of the WHOQOL-BREF in a sample of pregnant women. Methods A convenience sample of 1015 pregnant women in Sweden completed the WHOQOL-BREF online. We examined the psychometric properties of the instrument using principal component analysis (PCA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach’s alpha, item-domain correlations, correlations with overall QOL and general health, and multiple linear regression with items on overall QOL and general health as outcomes. Results Principal Component Analysis in a random subsample (n = 502) supported a four-factor model, encompassing the domains physical, psychological, social and environmental quality of life, but with four of the items originally in the environmental domain relocated to the other domains. The proposed domain structure showed good fit in confirmatory factor analysis in the other random subsample (n = 513). The physical and psychological domains showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.885 and 0.826 respectively), while the social and environmental domains were weaker in this regard. All domains showed significant positive correlations with items on overall QOL and general health. The physical and psychological domains were the most evident predictors in the regression models. Conclusions We find the Swedish version of the WHOQOL-BREF to have good psychometric properties to be used in samples of pregnant women, and propose an alternative domain structure that might be even more useful for assessing quality of life during pregnancy. The physical and psychological domains showed good internal consistency and construct validity. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-eaec321a42f442c3bd10eea018f2c68c |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 1477-7525 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-08-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-eaec321a42f442c3bd10eea018f2c68c2025-08-19T22:42:05ZengBMCHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes1477-75252023-08-0121111110.1186/s12955-023-02166-2Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant populationElisabet Rondung0Sandra Oliveira1Francisco Esteves2Department of Psychology and Social Work, Mid Sweden UniversityFaculdade de Ciências Humanas, Católica Research Centre for Psychological, Family, and Social Wellbeing, Universidade Católica PortuguesaDepartment of Psychology and Social Work, Mid Sweden UniversityAbstract Background Physical end emotional changes during pregnancy may not only affect pregnant womens’ quality of life, but also how instruments assessing quality of life perform in such populations. To date, there is insufficient evidence on psychometric properties for both generic and condition-specific instruments measuring quality of life during pregnancy. The aim of this study was thus to examine the structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity of the WHOQOL-BREF in a sample of pregnant women. Methods A convenience sample of 1015 pregnant women in Sweden completed the WHOQOL-BREF online. We examined the psychometric properties of the instrument using principal component analysis (PCA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach’s alpha, item-domain correlations, correlations with overall QOL and general health, and multiple linear regression with items on overall QOL and general health as outcomes. Results Principal Component Analysis in a random subsample (n = 502) supported a four-factor model, encompassing the domains physical, psychological, social and environmental quality of life, but with four of the items originally in the environmental domain relocated to the other domains. The proposed domain structure showed good fit in confirmatory factor analysis in the other random subsample (n = 513). The physical and psychological domains showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.885 and 0.826 respectively), while the social and environmental domains were weaker in this regard. All domains showed significant positive correlations with items on overall QOL and general health. The physical and psychological domains were the most evident predictors in the regression models. Conclusions We find the Swedish version of the WHOQOL-BREF to have good psychometric properties to be used in samples of pregnant women, and propose an alternative domain structure that might be even more useful for assessing quality of life during pregnancy. The physical and psychological domains showed good internal consistency and construct validity.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02166-2Quality of lifeWHOQOL-BREFPregnancyWomenValidityConfirmatory factor analysis |
| spellingShingle | Elisabet Rondung Sandra Oliveira Francisco Esteves Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population Quality of life WHOQOL-BREF Pregnancy Women Validity Confirmatory factor analysis |
| title | Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population |
| title_full | Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population |
| title_fullStr | Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population |
| title_full_unstemmed | Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population |
| title_short | Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population |
| title_sort | validity and reliability of the whoqol bref in a pregnant population |
| topic | Quality of life WHOQOL-BREF Pregnancy Women Validity Confirmatory factor analysis |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02166-2 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elisabetrondung validityandreliabilityofthewhoqolbrefinapregnantpopulation AT sandraoliveira validityandreliabilityofthewhoqolbrefinapregnantpopulation AT franciscoesteves validityandreliabilityofthewhoqolbrefinapregnantpopulation |
