In vivo dosimetry in brachytherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice

Brachytherapy can deliver high doses to the target while sparing healthy tissues due to its steep dose gradient leading to excellent clinical outcome. Treatment accuracy depends on several manual steps making brachytherapy susceptible to operational mistakes. Currently, treatment delivery verificati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Main Authors: Gabriel P. Fonseca, Jacob G. Johansen, Ryan L. Smith, Luc Beaulieu, Sam Beddar, Gustavo Kertzscher, Frank Verhaegen, Kari Tanderup
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-10-01
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631620300518
_version_ 1849314424107565056
author Gabriel P. Fonseca
Jacob G. Johansen
Ryan L. Smith
Luc Beaulieu
Sam Beddar
Gustavo Kertzscher
Frank Verhaegen
Kari Tanderup
author_facet Gabriel P. Fonseca
Jacob G. Johansen
Ryan L. Smith
Luc Beaulieu
Sam Beddar
Gustavo Kertzscher
Frank Verhaegen
Kari Tanderup
author_sort Gabriel P. Fonseca
collection DOAJ
container_title Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
description Brachytherapy can deliver high doses to the target while sparing healthy tissues due to its steep dose gradient leading to excellent clinical outcome. Treatment accuracy depends on several manual steps making brachytherapy susceptible to operational mistakes. Currently, treatment delivery verification is not routinely available and has led, in some cases, to systematic errors going unnoticed for years. The brachytherapy community promoted developments in in vivo dosimetry (IVD) through research groups and small companies. Although very few of the systems have been used clinically, it was demonstrated that the likelihood of detecting deviations from the treatment plan increases significantly with time-resolved methods. Time–resolved methods could interrupt a treatment avoiding gross errors which is not possible with time-integrated dosimetry. In addition, lower experimental uncertainties can be achieved by using source-tracking instead of direct dose measurements. However, the detector position in relation to the patient anatomy remains a main source of uncertainty. The next steps towards clinical implementation will require clinical trials and systematic reporting of errors and near-misses. It is of utmost importance for each IVD system that its sensitivity to different types of errors is well understood, so that end-users can select the most suitable method for their needs. This report aims to formulate requirements for the stakeholders (clinics, vendors, and researchers) to facilitate increased clinical use of IVD in brachytherapy. The report focuses on high dose-rate IVD in brachytherapy providing an overview and outlining the need for further development and research.
format Article
id doaj-art-ec86ce32b47d4e9a8d637eaea0f529fa
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2405-6316
language English
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-ec86ce32b47d4e9a8d637eaea0f529fa2025-09-03T03:19:24ZengElsevierPhysics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology2405-63162020-10-011611110.1016/j.phro.2020.09.002In vivo dosimetry in brachytherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practiceGabriel P. Fonseca0Jacob G. Johansen1Ryan L. Smith2Luc Beaulieu3Sam Beddar4Gustavo Kertzscher5Frank Verhaegen6Kari Tanderup7Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Doctor Tanslaan 12, 6229 ET Maastricht, the Netherlands; Corresponding author.Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, DenmarkAlfred Health Radiation Oncology, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, AustraliaDepartment of Physics, Engineering Physics & Optics and Cancer Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Research Center of CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, CanadaDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1420, Houston, TX 77030, United StatesDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, DenmarkDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Doctor Tanslaan 12, 6229 ET Maastricht, the NetherlandsDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, DenmarkBrachytherapy can deliver high doses to the target while sparing healthy tissues due to its steep dose gradient leading to excellent clinical outcome. Treatment accuracy depends on several manual steps making brachytherapy susceptible to operational mistakes. Currently, treatment delivery verification is not routinely available and has led, in some cases, to systematic errors going unnoticed for years. The brachytherapy community promoted developments in in vivo dosimetry (IVD) through research groups and small companies. Although very few of the systems have been used clinically, it was demonstrated that the likelihood of detecting deviations from the treatment plan increases significantly with time-resolved methods. Time–resolved methods could interrupt a treatment avoiding gross errors which is not possible with time-integrated dosimetry. In addition, lower experimental uncertainties can be achieved by using source-tracking instead of direct dose measurements. However, the detector position in relation to the patient anatomy remains a main source of uncertainty. The next steps towards clinical implementation will require clinical trials and systematic reporting of errors and near-misses. It is of utmost importance for each IVD system that its sensitivity to different types of errors is well understood, so that end-users can select the most suitable method for their needs. This report aims to formulate requirements for the stakeholders (clinics, vendors, and researchers) to facilitate increased clinical use of IVD in brachytherapy. The report focuses on high dose-rate IVD in brachytherapy providing an overview and outlining the need for further development and research.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631620300518In vivo dosimetryBrachytherapyTreatment verification
spellingShingle Gabriel P. Fonseca
Jacob G. Johansen
Ryan L. Smith
Luc Beaulieu
Sam Beddar
Gustavo Kertzscher
Frank Verhaegen
Kari Tanderup
In vivo dosimetry in brachytherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice
In vivo dosimetry
Brachytherapy
Treatment verification
title In vivo dosimetry in brachytherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice
title_full In vivo dosimetry in brachytherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice
title_fullStr In vivo dosimetry in brachytherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed In vivo dosimetry in brachytherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice
title_short In vivo dosimetry in brachytherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice
title_sort in vivo dosimetry in brachytherapy requirements and future directions for research development and clinical practice
topic In vivo dosimetry
Brachytherapy
Treatment verification
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631620300518
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielpfonseca invivodosimetryinbrachytherapyrequirementsandfuturedirectionsforresearchdevelopmentandclinicalpractice
AT jacobgjohansen invivodosimetryinbrachytherapyrequirementsandfuturedirectionsforresearchdevelopmentandclinicalpractice
AT ryanlsmith invivodosimetryinbrachytherapyrequirementsandfuturedirectionsforresearchdevelopmentandclinicalpractice
AT lucbeaulieu invivodosimetryinbrachytherapyrequirementsandfuturedirectionsforresearchdevelopmentandclinicalpractice
AT sambeddar invivodosimetryinbrachytherapyrequirementsandfuturedirectionsforresearchdevelopmentandclinicalpractice
AT gustavokertzscher invivodosimetryinbrachytherapyrequirementsandfuturedirectionsforresearchdevelopmentandclinicalpractice
AT frankverhaegen invivodosimetryinbrachytherapyrequirementsandfuturedirectionsforresearchdevelopmentandclinicalpractice
AT karitanderup invivodosimetryinbrachytherapyrequirementsandfuturedirectionsforresearchdevelopmentandclinicalpractice