Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial

Objective The ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial showed increased breastfeeding at 6 months in participants who received the proactive telephone-based peer support breastfeeding intervention compared with participants allocated to receive standard care and supp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ Open
Main Authors: Lisa Gold, Della A Forster, Fiona E McLardie-Hore, Touran Shafiei, Mary-Ann Davey, Lisa H Amir, H L McLachlan, Heather Grimes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-01
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/6/e067049.full
_version_ 1850001131515674624
author Lisa Gold
Della A Forster
Fiona E McLardie-Hore
Touran Shafiei
Mary-Ann Davey
Lisa H Amir
H L McLachlan
Heather Grimes
author_facet Lisa Gold
Della A Forster
Fiona E McLardie-Hore
Touran Shafiei
Mary-Ann Davey
Lisa H Amir
H L McLachlan
Heather Grimes
author_sort Lisa Gold
collection DOAJ
container_title BMJ Open
description Objective The ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial showed increased breastfeeding at 6 months in participants who received the proactive telephone-based peer support breastfeeding intervention compared with participants allocated to receive standard care and supports. The present study aimed to evaluate if the intervention was cost-effective.Design A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis.Setting Three metropolitan maternity services in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.Participants First time mothers intending to breastfeed their infant (1152) and peer volunteers (246).Intervention The intervention comprised proactive telephone-based support from a peer volunteer from early postpartum up to 6 months. Participants were allocated to usual care (n=578) or the intervention (n=574).Main outcome measures Costs during a 6-month follow-up period including individual healthcare, breastfeeding support and intervention costs in all participants, and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.Results Costs per mother supported were valued at $263.75 (or $90.33 excluding costs of donated volunteer time). There was no difference between the two arms in costs for infant and mothers in healthcare and breastfeeding support costs. These figures result in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $4146 ($1393 if volunteer time excluded) per additional mother breast feeding at 6 months.Conclusion Considering the significant improvement in breastfeeding outcomes, this intervention is potentially cost-effective. These findings, along with the high value placed on the intervention by women and peer volunteers provides robust evidence to upscale the implementation of this intervention.Trial registration number ACTRN12612001024831.
format Article
id doaj-art-ecc88232ba264cfe9eee92407a409aaa
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-ecc88232ba264cfe9eee92407a409aaa2025-08-20T00:48:56ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552023-06-0113610.1136/bmjopen-2022-067049Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trialLisa Gold0Della A Forster1Fiona E McLardie-Hore2Touran Shafiei3Mary-Ann Davey4Lisa H Amir5H L McLachlan6Heather Grimes7Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia2 The Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaMidwifery and Maternity Services Research, Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia2 School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia6 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, AustraliaJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, AustraliaJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia8 College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, AustraliaObjective The ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial showed increased breastfeeding at 6 months in participants who received the proactive telephone-based peer support breastfeeding intervention compared with participants allocated to receive standard care and supports. The present study aimed to evaluate if the intervention was cost-effective.Design A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis.Setting Three metropolitan maternity services in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.Participants First time mothers intending to breastfeed their infant (1152) and peer volunteers (246).Intervention The intervention comprised proactive telephone-based support from a peer volunteer from early postpartum up to 6 months. Participants were allocated to usual care (n=578) or the intervention (n=574).Main outcome measures Costs during a 6-month follow-up period including individual healthcare, breastfeeding support and intervention costs in all participants, and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.Results Costs per mother supported were valued at $263.75 (or $90.33 excluding costs of donated volunteer time). There was no difference between the two arms in costs for infant and mothers in healthcare and breastfeeding support costs. These figures result in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $4146 ($1393 if volunteer time excluded) per additional mother breast feeding at 6 months.Conclusion Considering the significant improvement in breastfeeding outcomes, this intervention is potentially cost-effective. These findings, along with the high value placed on the intervention by women and peer volunteers provides robust evidence to upscale the implementation of this intervention.Trial registration number ACTRN12612001024831.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/6/e067049.full
spellingShingle Lisa Gold
Della A Forster
Fiona E McLardie-Hore
Touran Shafiei
Mary-Ann Davey
Lisa H Amir
H L McLachlan
Heather Grimes
Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial
title Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial
title_full Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial
title_short Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial
title_sort is proactive telephone based breastfeeding peer support a cost effective intervention a within trial cost effectiveness analysis of the ringing up about breastfeeding early ruby randomised controlled trial
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/6/e067049.full
work_keys_str_mv AT lisagold isproactivetelephonebasedbreastfeedingpeersupportacosteffectiveinterventionawithintrialcosteffectivenessanalysisoftheringingupaboutbreastfeedingearlyrubyrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dellaaforster isproactivetelephonebasedbreastfeedingpeersupportacosteffectiveinterventionawithintrialcosteffectivenessanalysisoftheringingupaboutbreastfeedingearlyrubyrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fionaemclardiehore isproactivetelephonebasedbreastfeedingpeersupportacosteffectiveinterventionawithintrialcosteffectivenessanalysisoftheringingupaboutbreastfeedingearlyrubyrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT touranshafiei isproactivetelephonebasedbreastfeedingpeersupportacosteffectiveinterventionawithintrialcosteffectivenessanalysisoftheringingupaboutbreastfeedingearlyrubyrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT maryanndavey isproactivetelephonebasedbreastfeedingpeersupportacosteffectiveinterventionawithintrialcosteffectivenessanalysisoftheringingupaboutbreastfeedingearlyrubyrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lisahamir isproactivetelephonebasedbreastfeedingpeersupportacosteffectiveinterventionawithintrialcosteffectivenessanalysisoftheringingupaboutbreastfeedingearlyrubyrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hlmclachlan isproactivetelephonebasedbreastfeedingpeersupportacosteffectiveinterventionawithintrialcosteffectivenessanalysisoftheringingupaboutbreastfeedingearlyrubyrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT heathergrimes isproactivetelephonebasedbreastfeedingpeersupportacosteffectiveinterventionawithintrialcosteffectivenessanalysisoftheringingupaboutbreastfeedingearlyrubyrandomisedcontrolledtrial