Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial
Objective The ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial showed increased breastfeeding at 6 months in participants who received the proactive telephone-based peer support breastfeeding intervention compared with participants allocated to receive standard care and supp...
| Published in: | BMJ Open |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023-06-01
|
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/6/e067049.full |
| _version_ | 1850001131515674624 |
|---|---|
| author | Lisa Gold Della A Forster Fiona E McLardie-Hore Touran Shafiei Mary-Ann Davey Lisa H Amir H L McLachlan Heather Grimes |
| author_facet | Lisa Gold Della A Forster Fiona E McLardie-Hore Touran Shafiei Mary-Ann Davey Lisa H Amir H L McLachlan Heather Grimes |
| author_sort | Lisa Gold |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | BMJ Open |
| description | Objective The ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial showed increased breastfeeding at 6 months in participants who received the proactive telephone-based peer support breastfeeding intervention compared with participants allocated to receive standard care and supports. The present study aimed to evaluate if the intervention was cost-effective.Design A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis.Setting Three metropolitan maternity services in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.Participants First time mothers intending to breastfeed their infant (1152) and peer volunteers (246).Intervention The intervention comprised proactive telephone-based support from a peer volunteer from early postpartum up to 6 months. Participants were allocated to usual care (n=578) or the intervention (n=574).Main outcome measures Costs during a 6-month follow-up period including individual healthcare, breastfeeding support and intervention costs in all participants, and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.Results Costs per mother supported were valued at $263.75 (or $90.33 excluding costs of donated volunteer time). There was no difference between the two arms in costs for infant and mothers in healthcare and breastfeeding support costs. These figures result in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $4146 ($1393 if volunteer time excluded) per additional mother breast feeding at 6 months.Conclusion Considering the significant improvement in breastfeeding outcomes, this intervention is potentially cost-effective. These findings, along with the high value placed on the intervention by women and peer volunteers provides robust evidence to upscale the implementation of this intervention.Trial registration number ACTRN12612001024831. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ecc88232ba264cfe9eee92407a409aaa |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-ecc88232ba264cfe9eee92407a409aaa2025-08-20T00:48:56ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552023-06-0113610.1136/bmjopen-2022-067049Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trialLisa Gold0Della A Forster1Fiona E McLardie-Hore2Touran Shafiei3Mary-Ann Davey4Lisa H Amir5H L McLachlan6Heather Grimes7Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia2 The Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaMidwifery and Maternity Services Research, Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia2 School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia6 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, AustraliaJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, AustraliaJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia8 College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, AustraliaObjective The ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial showed increased breastfeeding at 6 months in participants who received the proactive telephone-based peer support breastfeeding intervention compared with participants allocated to receive standard care and supports. The present study aimed to evaluate if the intervention was cost-effective.Design A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis.Setting Three metropolitan maternity services in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.Participants First time mothers intending to breastfeed their infant (1152) and peer volunteers (246).Intervention The intervention comprised proactive telephone-based support from a peer volunteer from early postpartum up to 6 months. Participants were allocated to usual care (n=578) or the intervention (n=574).Main outcome measures Costs during a 6-month follow-up period including individual healthcare, breastfeeding support and intervention costs in all participants, and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.Results Costs per mother supported were valued at $263.75 (or $90.33 excluding costs of donated volunteer time). There was no difference between the two arms in costs for infant and mothers in healthcare and breastfeeding support costs. These figures result in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $4146 ($1393 if volunteer time excluded) per additional mother breast feeding at 6 months.Conclusion Considering the significant improvement in breastfeeding outcomes, this intervention is potentially cost-effective. These findings, along with the high value placed on the intervention by women and peer volunteers provides robust evidence to upscale the implementation of this intervention.Trial registration number ACTRN12612001024831.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/6/e067049.full |
| spellingShingle | Lisa Gold Della A Forster Fiona E McLardie-Hore Touran Shafiei Mary-Ann Davey Lisa H Amir H L McLachlan Heather Grimes Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial |
| title | Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial |
| title_full | Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial |
| title_fullStr | Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial |
| title_short | Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the ‘Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial |
| title_sort | is proactive telephone based breastfeeding peer support a cost effective intervention a within trial cost effectiveness analysis of the ringing up about breastfeeding early ruby randomised controlled trial |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/6/e067049.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lisagold isproactivetelephonebasedbreastfeedingpeersupportacosteffectiveinterventionawithintrialcosteffectivenessanalysisoftheringingupaboutbreastfeedingearlyrubyrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dellaaforster isproactivetelephonebasedbreastfeedingpeersupportacosteffectiveinterventionawithintrialcosteffectivenessanalysisoftheringingupaboutbreastfeedingearlyrubyrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT fionaemclardiehore isproactivetelephonebasedbreastfeedingpeersupportacosteffectiveinterventionawithintrialcosteffectivenessanalysisoftheringingupaboutbreastfeedingearlyrubyrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT touranshafiei isproactivetelephonebasedbreastfeedingpeersupportacosteffectiveinterventionawithintrialcosteffectivenessanalysisoftheringingupaboutbreastfeedingearlyrubyrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT maryanndavey isproactivetelephonebasedbreastfeedingpeersupportacosteffectiveinterventionawithintrialcosteffectivenessanalysisoftheringingupaboutbreastfeedingearlyrubyrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lisahamir isproactivetelephonebasedbreastfeedingpeersupportacosteffectiveinterventionawithintrialcosteffectivenessanalysisoftheringingupaboutbreastfeedingearlyrubyrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hlmclachlan isproactivetelephonebasedbreastfeedingpeersupportacosteffectiveinterventionawithintrialcosteffectivenessanalysisoftheringingupaboutbreastfeedingearlyrubyrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT heathergrimes isproactivetelephonebasedbreastfeedingpeersupportacosteffectiveinterventionawithintrialcosteffectivenessanalysisoftheringingupaboutbreastfeedingearlyrubyrandomisedcontrolledtrial |
