COVID-19 testing systems and their effectiveness in small, semi-isolated groups for sports events.
In this study, we quantitatively assessed the effectiveness of systems for COVID-19 testing in small groups of sport teams that are semi-isolated from the general population by countermeasures against infection. Two types of group were assumed, and the dynamics of infection within each group was mod...
| الحاوية / القاعدة: | PLoS ONE |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , , , , , |
| التنسيق: | مقال |
| اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
| منشور في: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-01-01
|
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266197 |
| _version_ | 1857015925655470080 |
|---|---|
| author | Masashi Kamo Michio Murakami Wataru Naito Jun-Ichi Takeshita Tetsuo Yasutaka Seiya Imoto |
| author_facet | Masashi Kamo Michio Murakami Wataru Naito Jun-Ichi Takeshita Tetsuo Yasutaka Seiya Imoto |
| author_sort | Masashi Kamo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | PLoS ONE |
| description | In this study, we quantitatively assessed the effectiveness of systems for COVID-19 testing in small groups of sport teams that are semi-isolated from the general population by countermeasures against infection. Two types of group were assumed, and the dynamics of infection within each group was modeled by using a compartment model of infectious disease. One group (Group A) comprised domestic professional sports teams that play many games over a season while remaining within a relatively small region. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests were routinely conducted once every 2 weeks, and the number of infected individuals that could not be quarantined after identification by testing or checking for symptoms was defined as the risk. The other group (Group B) comprised teams that travel across borders for mass-gathering events like the Olympic and Paralympic Games. The teams were isolated for 2 weeks at their destination; frequent testing and checking for symptoms was conducted, and any infected individuals were quarantined. The number of infected individuals participating in games after the isolation period was defined as the risk. In Group A, the number of infected individuals detected by routinely conducted PCR testing was lower than the number of infected individuals detected by checking for symptoms, indicating that routine testing every 2 weeks was not very effective. In Group B, daily PCR testing was the most effective, followed by daily antigen testing. Dual testing, in which individuals with a positive antigen test were given an additional PCR test, was the least effective with an effect equal to PCR testing every other day. These results indicate that repeated testing does not necessarily increase the detection of infected individuals. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ece7b173cf6940dc8599086ff40b07e7 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-ece7b173cf6940dc8599086ff40b07e72025-08-19T19:45:22ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01173e026619710.1371/journal.pone.0266197COVID-19 testing systems and their effectiveness in small, semi-isolated groups for sports events.Masashi KamoMichio MurakamiWataru NaitoJun-Ichi TakeshitaTetsuo YasutakaSeiya ImotoIn this study, we quantitatively assessed the effectiveness of systems for COVID-19 testing in small groups of sport teams that are semi-isolated from the general population by countermeasures against infection. Two types of group were assumed, and the dynamics of infection within each group was modeled by using a compartment model of infectious disease. One group (Group A) comprised domestic professional sports teams that play many games over a season while remaining within a relatively small region. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests were routinely conducted once every 2 weeks, and the number of infected individuals that could not be quarantined after identification by testing or checking for symptoms was defined as the risk. The other group (Group B) comprised teams that travel across borders for mass-gathering events like the Olympic and Paralympic Games. The teams were isolated for 2 weeks at their destination; frequent testing and checking for symptoms was conducted, and any infected individuals were quarantined. The number of infected individuals participating in games after the isolation period was defined as the risk. In Group A, the number of infected individuals detected by routinely conducted PCR testing was lower than the number of infected individuals detected by checking for symptoms, indicating that routine testing every 2 weeks was not very effective. In Group B, daily PCR testing was the most effective, followed by daily antigen testing. Dual testing, in which individuals with a positive antigen test were given an additional PCR test, was the least effective with an effect equal to PCR testing every other day. These results indicate that repeated testing does not necessarily increase the detection of infected individuals.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266197 |
| spellingShingle | Masashi Kamo Michio Murakami Wataru Naito Jun-Ichi Takeshita Tetsuo Yasutaka Seiya Imoto COVID-19 testing systems and their effectiveness in small, semi-isolated groups for sports events. |
| title | COVID-19 testing systems and their effectiveness in small, semi-isolated groups for sports events. |
| title_full | COVID-19 testing systems and their effectiveness in small, semi-isolated groups for sports events. |
| title_fullStr | COVID-19 testing systems and their effectiveness in small, semi-isolated groups for sports events. |
| title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 testing systems and their effectiveness in small, semi-isolated groups for sports events. |
| title_short | COVID-19 testing systems and their effectiveness in small, semi-isolated groups for sports events. |
| title_sort | covid 19 testing systems and their effectiveness in small semi isolated groups for sports events |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266197 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT masashikamo covid19testingsystemsandtheireffectivenessinsmallsemiisolatedgroupsforsportsevents AT michiomurakami covid19testingsystemsandtheireffectivenessinsmallsemiisolatedgroupsforsportsevents AT watarunaito covid19testingsystemsandtheireffectivenessinsmallsemiisolatedgroupsforsportsevents AT junichitakeshita covid19testingsystemsandtheireffectivenessinsmallsemiisolatedgroupsforsportsevents AT tetsuoyasutaka covid19testingsystemsandtheireffectivenessinsmallsemiisolatedgroupsforsportsevents AT seiyaimoto covid19testingsystemsandtheireffectivenessinsmallsemiisolatedgroupsforsportsevents |
