Quasipolynomial Normalisation in Deep Inference via Atomic Flows and Threshold Formulae

Je\v{r}\'abek showed that cuts in classical propositional logic proofs in deep inference can be eliminated in quasipolynomial time. The proof is indirect and it relies on a result of Atserias, Galesi and Pudl\'ak about monotone sequent calculus and a correspondence between that system and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Logical Methods in Computer Science
Main Authors: Paola Bruscoli, Alessio Guglielmi, Tom Gundersen, Michel Parigot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Logical Methods in Computer Science e.V. 2016-05-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://lmcs.episciences.org/1637/pdf
_version_ 1850367635635568640
author Paola Bruscoli
Alessio Guglielmi
Tom Gundersen
Michel Parigot
author_facet Paola Bruscoli
Alessio Guglielmi
Tom Gundersen
Michel Parigot
author_sort Paola Bruscoli
collection DOAJ
container_title Logical Methods in Computer Science
description Je\v{r}\'abek showed that cuts in classical propositional logic proofs in deep inference can be eliminated in quasipolynomial time. The proof is indirect and it relies on a result of Atserias, Galesi and Pudl\'ak about monotone sequent calculus and a correspondence between that system and cut-free deep-inference proofs. In this paper we give a direct proof of Je\v{r}\'abek's result: we give a quasipolynomial-time cut-elimination procedure for classical propositional logic in deep inference. The main new ingredient is the use of a computational trace of deep-inference proofs called atomic flows, which are both very simple (they only trace structural rules and forget logical rules) and strong enough to faithfully represent the cut-elimination procedure.
format Article
id doaj-art-eec2d01e920f4e43bf6f9b85aaca024a
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1860-5974
language English
publishDate 2016-05-01
publisher Logical Methods in Computer Science e.V.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-eec2d01e920f4e43bf6f9b85aaca024a2025-08-19T23:02:46ZengLogical Methods in Computer Science e.V.Logical Methods in Computer Science1860-59742016-05-01Volume 12, Issue 210.2168/LMCS-12(2:5)20161637Quasipolynomial Normalisation in Deep Inference via Atomic Flows and Threshold FormulaePaola BruscoliAlessio Guglielmihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7234-2347Tom GundersenMichel ParigotJe\v{r}\'abek showed that cuts in classical propositional logic proofs in deep inference can be eliminated in quasipolynomial time. The proof is indirect and it relies on a result of Atserias, Galesi and Pudl\'ak about monotone sequent calculus and a correspondence between that system and cut-free deep-inference proofs. In this paper we give a direct proof of Je\v{r}\'abek's result: we give a quasipolynomial-time cut-elimination procedure for classical propositional logic in deep inference. The main new ingredient is the use of a computational trace of deep-inference proofs called atomic flows, which are both very simple (they only trace structural rules and forget logical rules) and strong enough to faithfully represent the cut-elimination procedure.https://lmcs.episciences.org/1637/pdfcomputer science - computational complexitycomputer science - logic in computer sciencef.4.1f.2.2
spellingShingle Paola Bruscoli
Alessio Guglielmi
Tom Gundersen
Michel Parigot
Quasipolynomial Normalisation in Deep Inference via Atomic Flows and Threshold Formulae
computer science - computational complexity
computer science - logic in computer science
f.4.1
f.2.2
title Quasipolynomial Normalisation in Deep Inference via Atomic Flows and Threshold Formulae
title_full Quasipolynomial Normalisation in Deep Inference via Atomic Flows and Threshold Formulae
title_fullStr Quasipolynomial Normalisation in Deep Inference via Atomic Flows and Threshold Formulae
title_full_unstemmed Quasipolynomial Normalisation in Deep Inference via Atomic Flows and Threshold Formulae
title_short Quasipolynomial Normalisation in Deep Inference via Atomic Flows and Threshold Formulae
title_sort quasipolynomial normalisation in deep inference via atomic flows and threshold formulae
topic computer science - computational complexity
computer science - logic in computer science
f.4.1
f.2.2
url https://lmcs.episciences.org/1637/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT paolabruscoli quasipolynomialnormalisationindeepinferenceviaatomicflowsandthresholdformulae
AT alessioguglielmi quasipolynomialnormalisationindeepinferenceviaatomicflowsandthresholdformulae
AT tomgundersen quasipolynomialnormalisationindeepinferenceviaatomicflowsandthresholdformulae
AT michelparigot quasipolynomialnormalisationindeepinferenceviaatomicflowsandthresholdformulae