Is There Still a Role for Sterilization by Tubal Ligation as a Contraceptive Method?
Norman D Goldstuck Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, Tygerberg Hospital Francie van Zyl Dr, Cape Town, South AfricaCorrespondence: Norman D Goldstuck, Email nahumzh@yahoo.comAbstract: Tubal ligation has been used since the...
| Published in: | Open Access Journal of Contraception |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2024-05-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/is-there-still-a-role-for-sterilization-by-tubal-ligation-as-a-contrac-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OAJC |
| _version_ | 1850361106543935488 |
|---|---|
| author | Goldstuck ND |
| author_facet | Goldstuck ND |
| author_sort | Goldstuck ND |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Open Access Journal of Contraception |
| description | Norman D Goldstuck Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, Tygerberg Hospital Francie van Zyl Dr, Cape Town, South AfricaCorrespondence: Norman D Goldstuck, Email nahumzh@yahoo.comAbstract: Tubal ligation has been used since the late nineteenth century to control undesired fertility in women. Over the years, there have been many improvements to the surgical technique, and the procedure has become a lot safer. Some recent developments, however, appear to make this procedure obsolete. In the first instance, there is now ample evidence that removing the Fallopian tubes rather than ligating them or closing them provides protection against developing ovarian carcinoma. The many surgical approaches and closure methods are therefore no longer appropriate. In the second instance, the use of long-acting reversible contraception has been shown to be as effective in preventing future pregnancy, more cost-effective and with even more health benefits than tubal ligation or tubectomy. This is especially true of the use of intrauterine levonorgestrel. The problem of regret and request for tubal ligation reversal, where that was performed, is eliminated as is the surgical concern of operating on older women with increased body mass index and medical co-morbidities.Keywords: tubal ligation, tubectomy, LARC, intrauterine contraception |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-eef4ea48587a4d9680b7793e65491cc8 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 1179-1527 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-05-01 |
| publisher | Dove Medical Press |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-eef4ea48587a4d9680b7793e65491cc82025-08-19T23:05:08ZengDove Medical PressOpen Access Journal of Contraception1179-15272024-05-01Volume 15858792989Is There Still a Role for Sterilization by Tubal Ligation as a Contraceptive Method?Goldstuck NDNorman D Goldstuck Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, Tygerberg Hospital Francie van Zyl Dr, Cape Town, South AfricaCorrespondence: Norman D Goldstuck, Email nahumzh@yahoo.comAbstract: Tubal ligation has been used since the late nineteenth century to control undesired fertility in women. Over the years, there have been many improvements to the surgical technique, and the procedure has become a lot safer. Some recent developments, however, appear to make this procedure obsolete. In the first instance, there is now ample evidence that removing the Fallopian tubes rather than ligating them or closing them provides protection against developing ovarian carcinoma. The many surgical approaches and closure methods are therefore no longer appropriate. In the second instance, the use of long-acting reversible contraception has been shown to be as effective in preventing future pregnancy, more cost-effective and with even more health benefits than tubal ligation or tubectomy. This is especially true of the use of intrauterine levonorgestrel. The problem of regret and request for tubal ligation reversal, where that was performed, is eliminated as is the surgical concern of operating on older women with increased body mass index and medical co-morbidities.Keywords: tubal ligation, tubectomy, LARC, intrauterine contraceptionhttps://www.dovepress.com/is-there-still-a-role-for-sterilization-by-tubal-ligation-as-a-contrac-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OAJCtubal ligationtubectomylarcintrauterine contraception |
| spellingShingle | Goldstuck ND Is There Still a Role for Sterilization by Tubal Ligation as a Contraceptive Method? tubal ligation tubectomy larc intrauterine contraception |
| title | Is There Still a Role for Sterilization by Tubal Ligation as a Contraceptive Method? |
| title_full | Is There Still a Role for Sterilization by Tubal Ligation as a Contraceptive Method? |
| title_fullStr | Is There Still a Role for Sterilization by Tubal Ligation as a Contraceptive Method? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Is There Still a Role for Sterilization by Tubal Ligation as a Contraceptive Method? |
| title_short | Is There Still a Role for Sterilization by Tubal Ligation as a Contraceptive Method? |
| title_sort | is there still a role for sterilization by tubal ligation as a contraceptive method |
| topic | tubal ligation tubectomy larc intrauterine contraception |
| url | https://www.dovepress.com/is-there-still-a-role-for-sterilization-by-tubal-ligation-as-a-contrac-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OAJC |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT goldstucknd istherestillaroleforsterilizationbytuballigationasacontraceptivemethod |
