Antimicrobial Efficacy of Five Wound Irrigation Solutions in the Biofilm Microenvironment In Vitro and Ex Vivo

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are difficult to treat due to biofilm formation on implant surfaces and the surrounding tissue, often requiring removal or exchange of prostheses along with long-lasting antibiotic treatment. Antiseptic irrigation during...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antibiotics
Main Authors: Anja L. Honegger, Tiziano A. Schweizer, Yvonne Achermann, Philipp P. Bosshard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/14/1/25
_version_ 1849510998517481472
author Anja L. Honegger
Tiziano A. Schweizer
Yvonne Achermann
Philipp P. Bosshard
author_facet Anja L. Honegger
Tiziano A. Schweizer
Yvonne Achermann
Philipp P. Bosshard
author_sort Anja L. Honegger
collection DOAJ
container_title Antibiotics
description <b>Background/Objectives:</b> Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are difficult to treat due to biofilm formation on implant surfaces and the surrounding tissue, often requiring removal or exchange of prostheses along with long-lasting antibiotic treatment. Antiseptic irrigation during revision surgery might decrease bacterial biofilm load and thereby improve treatment success. This in vitro study investigated and compared the effect of five advanced wound irrigation solutions to reduce bacterial burden in biofilm microenvironment. <b>Methods:</b> We treated in vitro biofilms grown on titanium alloy implant discs with clinical bacterial strains isolated from patients with PJIs, as well as abscess communities in a plasma-supplemented collagen matrix. The biofilms were exposed for 1 min to the following wound irrigation solutions: Preventia<sup>®</sup>, Prontosan<sup>®</sup>, Granudacyn<sup>®</sup>, ActiMaris<sup>®</sup> forte (‘Actimaris’), and Octenilin<sup>®</sup>. We measured the bacterial reduction of these irrigation solutions compared to Ringer–Lactate and to the strong bactericidal but not approved Betaseptic solution. Additionally, ex vivo free-floating bacteria isolated directly from clinical sonication fluids were treated in the same way, and regrowth or lack of regrowth was recorded as the outcome. <b>Results:</b> Irrigation solutions demonstrated variable efficacy. The mean CFU log<sub>10</sub> reduction was as follows: Octenilin, 3.07, Preventia, 1.17, Actimaris, 1.11, Prontosan, 1.03, and Granudacyn, 0.61. For SACs, the reduction was: Actimaris, 8.27, Octenilin, 0.58, Prontosan, 0.56, Preventia, 0.35, and Granudacyn, 0.24. <b>Conclusions:</b> All solutions achieved complete bacterial eradication in all tested ex vivo sonication fluids, except Granudacyn, which was ineffective in 33% of the samples (2 out of 6). Advanced wound irrigation solutions have the potential to reduce bacterial burden in the biofilm microenvironment. However, their efficacy varies depending on bacterial species, growth state, and the composition of the irrigation solution. While Octenilin should be avoided for deep tissue irrigation due to its potential to cause tissue necrosis, the clinical benefit of wound irrigation solutions in infection prevention warrants further investigation in prospective clinical trials.
format Article
id doaj-art-eef5cc5eae234bd78803bcb1e9508374
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2079-6382
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-eef5cc5eae234bd78803bcb1e95083742025-08-20T02:57:48ZengMDPI AGAntibiotics2079-63822025-01-011412510.3390/antibiotics14010025Antimicrobial Efficacy of Five Wound Irrigation Solutions in the Biofilm Microenvironment In Vitro and Ex VivoAnja L. Honegger0Tiziano A. Schweizer1Yvonne Achermann2Philipp P. Bosshard3Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are difficult to treat due to biofilm formation on implant surfaces and the surrounding tissue, often requiring removal or exchange of prostheses along with long-lasting antibiotic treatment. Antiseptic irrigation during revision surgery might decrease bacterial biofilm load and thereby improve treatment success. This in vitro study investigated and compared the effect of five advanced wound irrigation solutions to reduce bacterial burden in biofilm microenvironment. <b>Methods:</b> We treated in vitro biofilms grown on titanium alloy implant discs with clinical bacterial strains isolated from patients with PJIs, as well as abscess communities in a plasma-supplemented collagen matrix. The biofilms were exposed for 1 min to the following wound irrigation solutions: Preventia<sup>®</sup>, Prontosan<sup>®</sup>, Granudacyn<sup>®</sup>, ActiMaris<sup>®</sup> forte (‘Actimaris’), and Octenilin<sup>®</sup>. We measured the bacterial reduction of these irrigation solutions compared to Ringer–Lactate and to the strong bactericidal but not approved Betaseptic solution. Additionally, ex vivo free-floating bacteria isolated directly from clinical sonication fluids were treated in the same way, and regrowth or lack of regrowth was recorded as the outcome. <b>Results:</b> Irrigation solutions demonstrated variable efficacy. The mean CFU log<sub>10</sub> reduction was as follows: Octenilin, 3.07, Preventia, 1.17, Actimaris, 1.11, Prontosan, 1.03, and Granudacyn, 0.61. For SACs, the reduction was: Actimaris, 8.27, Octenilin, 0.58, Prontosan, 0.56, Preventia, 0.35, and Granudacyn, 0.24. <b>Conclusions:</b> All solutions achieved complete bacterial eradication in all tested ex vivo sonication fluids, except Granudacyn, which was ineffective in 33% of the samples (2 out of 6). Advanced wound irrigation solutions have the potential to reduce bacterial burden in the biofilm microenvironment. However, their efficacy varies depending on bacterial species, growth state, and the composition of the irrigation solution. While Octenilin should be avoided for deep tissue irrigation due to its potential to cause tissue necrosis, the clinical benefit of wound irrigation solutions in infection prevention warrants further investigation in prospective clinical trials.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/14/1/25PJIbiofilmirrigationwound irrigation solution
spellingShingle Anja L. Honegger
Tiziano A. Schweizer
Yvonne Achermann
Philipp P. Bosshard
Antimicrobial Efficacy of Five Wound Irrigation Solutions in the Biofilm Microenvironment In Vitro and Ex Vivo
PJI
biofilm
irrigation
wound irrigation solution
title Antimicrobial Efficacy of Five Wound Irrigation Solutions in the Biofilm Microenvironment In Vitro and Ex Vivo
title_full Antimicrobial Efficacy of Five Wound Irrigation Solutions in the Biofilm Microenvironment In Vitro and Ex Vivo
title_fullStr Antimicrobial Efficacy of Five Wound Irrigation Solutions in the Biofilm Microenvironment In Vitro and Ex Vivo
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial Efficacy of Five Wound Irrigation Solutions in the Biofilm Microenvironment In Vitro and Ex Vivo
title_short Antimicrobial Efficacy of Five Wound Irrigation Solutions in the Biofilm Microenvironment In Vitro and Ex Vivo
title_sort antimicrobial efficacy of five wound irrigation solutions in the biofilm microenvironment in vitro and ex vivo
topic PJI
biofilm
irrigation
wound irrigation solution
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/14/1/25
work_keys_str_mv AT anjalhonegger antimicrobialefficacyoffivewoundirrigationsolutionsinthebiofilmmicroenvironmentinvitroandexvivo
AT tizianoaschweizer antimicrobialefficacyoffivewoundirrigationsolutionsinthebiofilmmicroenvironmentinvitroandexvivo
AT yvonneachermann antimicrobialefficacyoffivewoundirrigationsolutionsinthebiofilmmicroenvironmentinvitroandexvivo
AT philipppbosshard antimicrobialefficacyoffivewoundirrigationsolutionsinthebiofilmmicroenvironmentinvitroandexvivo