Re-analyzing and confirming a differential use of redintegration in students with mild and borderline intellectual disabilities

While numerous studies on verbal working memory have investigated the capacity of the phonological loop and the effectiveness of rehearsal as one core process for maintaining the memory trace, the reconstruction of the memory trace from long-term memory, called redintegration, has been studied less...

وصف كامل

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
الحاوية / القاعدة:Frontiers in Psychology
المؤلف الرئيسي: Gunnar Bruns
التنسيق: مقال
اللغة:الإنجليزية
منشور في: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-08-01
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1278458/full
_version_ 1849994215621132288
author Gunnar Bruns
author_facet Gunnar Bruns
author_sort Gunnar Bruns
collection DOAJ
container_title Frontiers in Psychology
description While numerous studies on verbal working memory have investigated the capacity of the phonological loop and the effectiveness of rehearsal as one core process for maintaining the memory trace, the reconstruction of the memory trace from long-term memory, called redintegration, has been studied less thoroughly. This holds particularly for the population of students with special educational learning needs and mild and borderline intellectual disabilities (MBID). In a previous study, we found a differential developmental relation between the effectiveness of redintegration and vocabulary size, counter-intuitively suggesting that students with MBID tend to show less effective redintegration with higher vocabulary size. However, differential item functioning (DIF) in the picture naming task may have biased the result. Therefore, the current study is a re-analysis of this interaction controlling for DIF in the vocabulary measure. To this end, the items of the picture naming task (k = 95) were analyzed through a Rasch model, and k = 29 biased items were excluded. The resulting corrected vocabulary score was used to predict the redintegration effectiveness, comparing students with and without MBID. The interaction remains significant, supporting the original finding that students with MBID have a differential developmental pattern and are less able to make adequate use of a growing vocabulary when reconstructing traces in their working memory. Implications of this result for the understanding of MBID and further research directions are discussed.
format Article
id doaj-art-f5b59cdded434e00a0efb1d200f15dc7
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1664-1078
language English
publishDate 2024-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-f5b59cdded434e00a0efb1d200f15dc72025-08-20T00:51:47ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782024-08-011510.3389/fpsyg.2024.12784581278458Re-analyzing and confirming a differential use of redintegration in students with mild and borderline intellectual disabilitiesGunnar BrunsWhile numerous studies on verbal working memory have investigated the capacity of the phonological loop and the effectiveness of rehearsal as one core process for maintaining the memory trace, the reconstruction of the memory trace from long-term memory, called redintegration, has been studied less thoroughly. This holds particularly for the population of students with special educational learning needs and mild and borderline intellectual disabilities (MBID). In a previous study, we found a differential developmental relation between the effectiveness of redintegration and vocabulary size, counter-intuitively suggesting that students with MBID tend to show less effective redintegration with higher vocabulary size. However, differential item functioning (DIF) in the picture naming task may have biased the result. Therefore, the current study is a re-analysis of this interaction controlling for DIF in the vocabulary measure. To this end, the items of the picture naming task (k = 95) were analyzed through a Rasch model, and k = 29 biased items were excluded. The resulting corrected vocabulary score was used to predict the redintegration effectiveness, comparing students with and without MBID. The interaction remains significant, supporting the original finding that students with MBID have a differential developmental pattern and are less able to make adequate use of a growing vocabulary when reconstructing traces in their working memory. Implications of this result for the understanding of MBID and further research directions are discussed.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1278458/fullworking memorymild intellectual disability (MID)borderline intellectual disabilityredintegrationdevelopmental trajectories psychometrika
spellingShingle Gunnar Bruns
Re-analyzing and confirming a differential use of redintegration in students with mild and borderline intellectual disabilities
working memory
mild intellectual disability (MID)
borderline intellectual disability
redintegration
developmental trajectories psychometrika
title Re-analyzing and confirming a differential use of redintegration in students with mild and borderline intellectual disabilities
title_full Re-analyzing and confirming a differential use of redintegration in students with mild and borderline intellectual disabilities
title_fullStr Re-analyzing and confirming a differential use of redintegration in students with mild and borderline intellectual disabilities
title_full_unstemmed Re-analyzing and confirming a differential use of redintegration in students with mild and borderline intellectual disabilities
title_short Re-analyzing and confirming a differential use of redintegration in students with mild and borderline intellectual disabilities
title_sort re analyzing and confirming a differential use of redintegration in students with mild and borderline intellectual disabilities
topic working memory
mild intellectual disability (MID)
borderline intellectual disability
redintegration
developmental trajectories psychometrika
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1278458/full
work_keys_str_mv AT gunnarbruns reanalyzingandconfirmingadifferentialuseofredintegrationinstudentswithmildandborderlineintellectualdisabilities