Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study

Background and study aims Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common neoplasms and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective treatment for early-stage CRC. However, it has been observed that patients undergoing ESD often complain of pain, even if ESD has been successfully perform...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Endoscopy International Open
Main Authors: Jun Arimoto, Takuma Higurashi, Shingo Kato, Akiko Fuyuki, Hidenori Ohkubo, Takashi Nonaka, Yoshikazu Yamaguchi, Keiichi Ashikari, Hideyuki Chiba, Shungo Goto, Masataka Taguri, Takashi Sakaguchi, Kazuhiro Atsukawa, Atsushi Nakajima
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-03-01
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0044-101451
_version_ 1856934422744399872
author Jun Arimoto
Takuma Higurashi
Shingo Kato
Akiko Fuyuki
Hidenori Ohkubo
Takashi Nonaka
Yoshikazu Yamaguchi
Keiichi Ashikari
Hideyuki Chiba
Shungo Goto
Masataka Taguri
Takashi Sakaguchi
Kazuhiro Atsukawa
Atsushi Nakajima
author_facet Jun Arimoto
Takuma Higurashi
Shingo Kato
Akiko Fuyuki
Hidenori Ohkubo
Takashi Nonaka
Yoshikazu Yamaguchi
Keiichi Ashikari
Hideyuki Chiba
Shungo Goto
Masataka Taguri
Takashi Sakaguchi
Kazuhiro Atsukawa
Atsushi Nakajima
author_sort Jun Arimoto
collection DOAJ
container_title Endoscopy International Open
description Background and study aims Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common neoplasms and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective treatment for early-stage CRC. However, it has been observed that patients undergoing ESD often complain of pain, even if ESD has been successfully performed. Risk factors for such pain still remain unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the risk factors for post-colorectal ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS). Patients and methods This was a prospective multicenter observational trial (UMIN000016781) conducted in 106 of 223 patients who underwent ESD between March 2015 and April 2016. We investigated age, sex, tumor location, ESD operation time, lesion size, duration of hospitalization, and frequency of PECS. We defined PECS as local abdominal pain (evaluated on a visual analogue scale) in the region corresponding to the site of the ESD that occurred within 4 days of the procedure. Results PECS occurred in 15/106 (14.2 %), and 10 were women (P = 0.01, OR: 7.74 [1.6 – 36.4]), 7 had lesions in the cecum (P < 0.001, OR: 20.6 [3.7 – 115.2]), and 9 in whom ESD operation time was > 90 min (P = 0.002, OR: 10.3 [2.4 – 44.6]). Frequency of deviation from the prescribed clinical path was significantly higher (47 % [7/15] vs. 2 % [2/91], P < 0.001, OR: 38.9 [6.9 – 219.6]), and hospital stay was significantly longer in the PECS group.  Conclusions Female gender, location of lesion in the cecum, and ESD operation time > 90 minutes were significant risk factors independent of PECS. These findings are important to management of PECS.
format Article
id doaj-art-fa1e98a2d7a24d2ca63f89caa178c65f
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
language English
publishDate 2018-03-01
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-fa1e98a2d7a24d2ca63f89caa178c65f2025-08-19T20:12:17ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362018-03-010603E342E34910.1055/s-0044-101451Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational studyJun Arimoto0Takuma Higurashi1Shingo Kato2Akiko Fuyuki3Hidenori Ohkubo4Takashi Nonaka5Yoshikazu Yamaguchi6Keiichi Ashikari7Hideyuki Chiba8Shungo Goto9Masataka Taguri10Takashi Sakaguchi11Kazuhiro Atsukawa12Atsushi Nakajima13Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiratsuka City Hospital, Hiratsuka, JapanDepartment of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiratsuka City Hospital, Hiratsuka, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiratsuka City Hospital, Hiratsuka, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanBackground and study aims Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common neoplasms and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective treatment for early-stage CRC. However, it has been observed that patients undergoing ESD often complain of pain, even if ESD has been successfully performed. Risk factors for such pain still remain unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the risk factors for post-colorectal ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS). Patients and methods This was a prospective multicenter observational trial (UMIN000016781) conducted in 106 of 223 patients who underwent ESD between March 2015 and April 2016. We investigated age, sex, tumor location, ESD operation time, lesion size, duration of hospitalization, and frequency of PECS. We defined PECS as local abdominal pain (evaluated on a visual analogue scale) in the region corresponding to the site of the ESD that occurred within 4 days of the procedure. Results PECS occurred in 15/106 (14.2 %), and 10 were women (P = 0.01, OR: 7.74 [1.6 – 36.4]), 7 had lesions in the cecum (P < 0.001, OR: 20.6 [3.7 – 115.2]), and 9 in whom ESD operation time was > 90 min (P = 0.002, OR: 10.3 [2.4 – 44.6]). Frequency of deviation from the prescribed clinical path was significantly higher (47 % [7/15] vs. 2 % [2/91], P < 0.001, OR: 38.9 [6.9 – 219.6]), and hospital stay was significantly longer in the PECS group.  Conclusions Female gender, location of lesion in the cecum, and ESD operation time > 90 minutes were significant risk factors independent of PECS. These findings are important to management of PECS.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0044-101451
spellingShingle Jun Arimoto
Takuma Higurashi
Shingo Kato
Akiko Fuyuki
Hidenori Ohkubo
Takashi Nonaka
Yoshikazu Yamaguchi
Keiichi Ashikari
Hideyuki Chiba
Shungo Goto
Masataka Taguri
Takashi Sakaguchi
Kazuhiro Atsukawa
Atsushi Nakajima
Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study
title Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study
title_full Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study
title_fullStr Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study
title_short Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study
title_sort risk factors for post colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection esd coagulation syndrome a multicenter prospective observational study
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0044-101451
work_keys_str_mv AT junarimoto riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT takumahigurashi riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT shingokato riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT akikofuyuki riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hidenoriohkubo riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT takashinonaka riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT yoshikazuyamaguchi riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT keiichiashikari riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hideyukichiba riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT shungogoto riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT masatakataguri riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT takashisakaguchi riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kazuhiroatsukawa riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT atsushinakajima riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy