Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study
Background and study aims Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common neoplasms and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective treatment for early-stage CRC. However, it has been observed that patients undergoing ESD often complain of pain, even if ESD has been successfully perform...
| Published in: | Endoscopy International Open |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2018-03-01
|
| Online Access: | http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0044-101451 |
| _version_ | 1856934422744399872 |
|---|---|
| author | Jun Arimoto Takuma Higurashi Shingo Kato Akiko Fuyuki Hidenori Ohkubo Takashi Nonaka Yoshikazu Yamaguchi Keiichi Ashikari Hideyuki Chiba Shungo Goto Masataka Taguri Takashi Sakaguchi Kazuhiro Atsukawa Atsushi Nakajima |
| author_facet | Jun Arimoto Takuma Higurashi Shingo Kato Akiko Fuyuki Hidenori Ohkubo Takashi Nonaka Yoshikazu Yamaguchi Keiichi Ashikari Hideyuki Chiba Shungo Goto Masataka Taguri Takashi Sakaguchi Kazuhiro Atsukawa Atsushi Nakajima |
| author_sort | Jun Arimoto |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Endoscopy International Open |
| description | Background and study aims Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common neoplasms and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective treatment for early-stage CRC. However, it has been observed that patients undergoing ESD often complain of pain, even if ESD has been successfully performed. Risk factors for such pain still remain unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the risk factors for post-colorectal ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS).
Patients and methods This was a prospective multicenter observational trial (UMIN000016781) conducted in 106 of 223 patients who underwent ESD between March 2015 and April 2016. We investigated age, sex, tumor location, ESD operation time, lesion size, duration of hospitalization, and frequency of PECS. We defined PECS as local abdominal pain (evaluated on a visual analogue scale) in the region corresponding to the site of the ESD that occurred within 4 days of the procedure.
Results PECS occurred in 15/106 (14.2 %), and 10 were women (P = 0.01, OR: 7.74 [1.6 – 36.4]), 7 had lesions in the cecum (P < 0.001, OR: 20.6 [3.7 – 115.2]), and 9 in whom ESD operation time was > 90 min (P = 0.002, OR: 10.3 [2.4 – 44.6]). Frequency of deviation from the prescribed clinical path was significantly higher (47 % [7/15] vs. 2 % [2/91], P < 0.001, OR: 38.9 [6.9 – 219.6]), and hospital stay was significantly longer in the PECS group.
Conclusions Female gender, location of lesion in the cecum, and ESD operation time > 90 minutes were significant risk factors independent of PECS. These findings are important to management of PECS. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-fa1e98a2d7a24d2ca63f89caa178c65f |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2364-3722 2196-9736 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2018-03-01 |
| publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-fa1e98a2d7a24d2ca63f89caa178c65f2025-08-19T20:12:17ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362018-03-010603E342E34910.1055/s-0044-101451Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational studyJun Arimoto0Takuma Higurashi1Shingo Kato2Akiko Fuyuki3Hidenori Ohkubo4Takashi Nonaka5Yoshikazu Yamaguchi6Keiichi Ashikari7Hideyuki Chiba8Shungo Goto9Masataka Taguri10Takashi Sakaguchi11Kazuhiro Atsukawa12Atsushi Nakajima13Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiratsuka City Hospital, Hiratsuka, JapanDepartment of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiratsuka City Hospital, Hiratsuka, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiratsuka City Hospital, Hiratsuka, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanBackground and study aims Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common neoplasms and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective treatment for early-stage CRC. However, it has been observed that patients undergoing ESD often complain of pain, even if ESD has been successfully performed. Risk factors for such pain still remain unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the risk factors for post-colorectal ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS). Patients and methods This was a prospective multicenter observational trial (UMIN000016781) conducted in 106 of 223 patients who underwent ESD between March 2015 and April 2016. We investigated age, sex, tumor location, ESD operation time, lesion size, duration of hospitalization, and frequency of PECS. We defined PECS as local abdominal pain (evaluated on a visual analogue scale) in the region corresponding to the site of the ESD that occurred within 4 days of the procedure. Results PECS occurred in 15/106 (14.2 %), and 10 were women (P = 0.01, OR: 7.74 [1.6 – 36.4]), 7 had lesions in the cecum (P < 0.001, OR: 20.6 [3.7 – 115.2]), and 9 in whom ESD operation time was > 90 min (P = 0.002, OR: 10.3 [2.4 – 44.6]). Frequency of deviation from the prescribed clinical path was significantly higher (47 % [7/15] vs. 2 % [2/91], P < 0.001, OR: 38.9 [6.9 – 219.6]), and hospital stay was significantly longer in the PECS group. Conclusions Female gender, location of lesion in the cecum, and ESD operation time > 90 minutes were significant risk factors independent of PECS. These findings are important to management of PECS.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0044-101451 |
| spellingShingle | Jun Arimoto Takuma Higurashi Shingo Kato Akiko Fuyuki Hidenori Ohkubo Takashi Nonaka Yoshikazu Yamaguchi Keiichi Ashikari Hideyuki Chiba Shungo Goto Masataka Taguri Takashi Sakaguchi Kazuhiro Atsukawa Atsushi Nakajima Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study |
| title | Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study |
| title_full | Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study |
| title_fullStr | Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study |
| title_short | Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study |
| title_sort | risk factors for post colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection esd coagulation syndrome a multicenter prospective observational study |
| url | http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0044-101451 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT junarimoto riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT takumahigurashi riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT shingokato riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT akikofuyuki riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT hidenoriohkubo riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT takashinonaka riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT yoshikazuyamaguchi riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT keiichiashikari riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT hideyukichiba riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT shungogoto riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT masatakataguri riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT takashisakaguchi riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT kazuhiroatsukawa riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT atsushinakajima riskfactorsforpostcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdcoagulationsyndromeamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy |
