Percutaneous posterior transiliac plate versus iliosacral screw fixation for posterior fixation of Tile C-type pelvic fractures: a retrospective comparative study

Abstract Background This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and complications between two minimally invasive surgical techniques: percutaneous transiliac plate fixation and iliosacral (IS) screw fixation for the treatment of Tile C-type pelvic bone fractures. Methods We retrospectively rev...

全面介紹

書目詳細資料
發表在:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Main Authors: Chul-Ho Kim, Jung Jae Kim, Ji Wan Kim
格式: Article
語言:英语
出版: BMC 2022-06-01
主題:
在線閱讀:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05536-x
_version_ 1857059265489928192
author Chul-Ho Kim
Jung Jae Kim
Ji Wan Kim
author_facet Chul-Ho Kim
Jung Jae Kim
Ji Wan Kim
author_sort Chul-Ho Kim
collection DOAJ
container_title BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
description Abstract Background This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and complications between two minimally invasive surgical techniques: percutaneous transiliac plate fixation and iliosacral (IS) screw fixation for the treatment of Tile C-type pelvic bone fractures. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the data of 77 consecutive patients with Tile C pelvic ring injuries who underwent either percutaneous transiliac plate fixation or IS screw fixation in a single academic center between November 2007 and January 2018. We recorded patients’ demographics, surgery-related data, and postoperative surgical outcomes and compared the incidence of complications and revision surgery rates between the two groups. Results Overall, 14 patients were included in the plate group, while 63 were included in the IS screw fixation group. No significant differences were observed in the patients’ demographics between the two groups except for a longer interval from injury to surgery (13.5 days vs. 5.4 days, P = 0.001). Both groups acquired fracture union in all cases. There was one case of infection requiring surgical debridement in the plating group. Notably, nerve injury (n = 3) and implant loosening (n = 5) occurred in the IS screw group, but the difference was not significant. Conclusions Both percutaneous posterior transiliac plating and IS screw fixation in patients with Tile C-type pelvic bone fractures showed good results. We recommend IS screw fixation as the primary treatment and propose posterior plating as treatment for sacral dysmorphism and bilateral sacral alar fractures in patients with spinopelvic dissociation. Level of evidence III
format Article
id doaj-art-fb48af3aa3e54f7ea7df8035a92a80e9
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1471-2474
language English
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-fb48af3aa3e54f7ea7df8035a92a80e92025-08-19T19:29:48ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742022-06-012311910.1186/s12891-022-05536-xPercutaneous posterior transiliac plate versus iliosacral screw fixation for posterior fixation of Tile C-type pelvic fractures: a retrospective comparative studyChul-Ho Kim0Jung Jae Kim1Ji Wan Kim2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of MedicineSamsong Seoul Orthopedic ClinicDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of MedicineAbstract Background This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and complications between two minimally invasive surgical techniques: percutaneous transiliac plate fixation and iliosacral (IS) screw fixation for the treatment of Tile C-type pelvic bone fractures. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the data of 77 consecutive patients with Tile C pelvic ring injuries who underwent either percutaneous transiliac plate fixation or IS screw fixation in a single academic center between November 2007 and January 2018. We recorded patients’ demographics, surgery-related data, and postoperative surgical outcomes and compared the incidence of complications and revision surgery rates between the two groups. Results Overall, 14 patients were included in the plate group, while 63 were included in the IS screw fixation group. No significant differences were observed in the patients’ demographics between the two groups except for a longer interval from injury to surgery (13.5 days vs. 5.4 days, P = 0.001). Both groups acquired fracture union in all cases. There was one case of infection requiring surgical debridement in the plating group. Notably, nerve injury (n = 3) and implant loosening (n = 5) occurred in the IS screw group, but the difference was not significant. Conclusions Both percutaneous posterior transiliac plating and IS screw fixation in patients with Tile C-type pelvic bone fractures showed good results. We recommend IS screw fixation as the primary treatment and propose posterior plating as treatment for sacral dysmorphism and bilateral sacral alar fractures in patients with spinopelvic dissociation. Level of evidence IIIhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05536-xIliosacral screwTrasiliac plate fixationPelvic bone fracture
spellingShingle Chul-Ho Kim
Jung Jae Kim
Ji Wan Kim
Percutaneous posterior transiliac plate versus iliosacral screw fixation for posterior fixation of Tile C-type pelvic fractures: a retrospective comparative study
Iliosacral screw
Trasiliac plate fixation
Pelvic bone fracture
title Percutaneous posterior transiliac plate versus iliosacral screw fixation for posterior fixation of Tile C-type pelvic fractures: a retrospective comparative study
title_full Percutaneous posterior transiliac plate versus iliosacral screw fixation for posterior fixation of Tile C-type pelvic fractures: a retrospective comparative study
title_fullStr Percutaneous posterior transiliac plate versus iliosacral screw fixation for posterior fixation of Tile C-type pelvic fractures: a retrospective comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous posterior transiliac plate versus iliosacral screw fixation for posterior fixation of Tile C-type pelvic fractures: a retrospective comparative study
title_short Percutaneous posterior transiliac plate versus iliosacral screw fixation for posterior fixation of Tile C-type pelvic fractures: a retrospective comparative study
title_sort percutaneous posterior transiliac plate versus iliosacral screw fixation for posterior fixation of tile c type pelvic fractures a retrospective comparative study
topic Iliosacral screw
Trasiliac plate fixation
Pelvic bone fracture
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05536-x
work_keys_str_mv AT chulhokim percutaneousposteriortransiliacplateversusiliosacralscrewfixationforposteriorfixationoftilectypepelvicfracturesaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT jungjaekim percutaneousposteriortransiliacplateversusiliosacralscrewfixationforposteriorfixationoftilectypepelvicfracturesaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT jiwankim percutaneousposteriortransiliacplateversusiliosacralscrewfixationforposteriorfixationoftilectypepelvicfracturesaretrospectivecomparativestudy