Phonological templates and the lexicon

In past phonology literature, diacritics, brackets and other extra-phonological objects have been employed to identify morpheme boundaries and to differentiate words from affixes. In the present study, we argue that all of these extra-phonological items bring arbitrariness to phonological theory sin...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
出版年:Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology
第一著者: Semra Baturay-Meral
フォーマット: 論文
言語:英語
出版事項: Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 2024-04-01
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:https://journals.openedition.org/lexis/8058
_version_ 1849413888505806848
author Semra Baturay-Meral
author_facet Semra Baturay-Meral
author_sort Semra Baturay-Meral
collection DOAJ
container_title Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology
description In past phonology literature, diacritics, brackets and other extra-phonological objects have been employed to identify morpheme boundaries and to differentiate words from affixes. In the present study, we argue that all of these extra-phonological items bring arbitrariness to phonological theory since phonology is only concerned with identifying phonological objects. In this respect, the present study proposes a new account in order to identify word boundaries in phonology and to explain phonological processes which show sensitivity to morphological boundaries without referring to any extra-phonological objects. Accordingly, we argue for a novel template model and propose that bases (e.g. words), productive suffixes and prefixes are listed in the lexicon with their own unique phonological templates, ONO, NO and ON, respectively. This means that their morphological categories are recognizable when they come to phonology. Also, the morphological boundness of prefixes and suffixes is visible in our template model: The absence of a final onset in prefixes (ON) and the absence of an initial onset in suffixes (NO) render them phonologically bound to a base because only bases exhibit an (O...O) structure. Accordingly, these morphemes come to phonology with their own templates, and phonological operations (government, licensing, etc.) apply to them when necessary. Also, we put forward two new parameters, the Final Onset Parameter and the Initial Onset Parameter, in order to explain the word-final/word-initial differences among languages. We argue that phonological processes, the phonology-morphology interface and their relation to the lexicon are non-arbitrarily explainable in our model thanks to the templates and novel parameters.
format Article
id doaj-art-fdcd2e8cfde647a6af096dcb26b9cdc8
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1951-6215
language English
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-fdcd2e8cfde647a6af096dcb26b9cdc82025-08-20T03:48:02ZengUniversité Jean Moulin - Lyon 3Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology1951-62152024-04-012310.4000/lexis.8058Phonological templates and the lexiconSemra Baturay-MeralIn past phonology literature, diacritics, brackets and other extra-phonological objects have been employed to identify morpheme boundaries and to differentiate words from affixes. In the present study, we argue that all of these extra-phonological items bring arbitrariness to phonological theory since phonology is only concerned with identifying phonological objects. In this respect, the present study proposes a new account in order to identify word boundaries in phonology and to explain phonological processes which show sensitivity to morphological boundaries without referring to any extra-phonological objects. Accordingly, we argue for a novel template model and propose that bases (e.g. words), productive suffixes and prefixes are listed in the lexicon with their own unique phonological templates, ONO, NO and ON, respectively. This means that their morphological categories are recognizable when they come to phonology. Also, the morphological boundness of prefixes and suffixes is visible in our template model: The absence of a final onset in prefixes (ON) and the absence of an initial onset in suffixes (NO) render them phonologically bound to a base because only bases exhibit an (O...O) structure. Accordingly, these morphemes come to phonology with their own templates, and phonological operations (government, licensing, etc.) apply to them when necessary. Also, we put forward two new parameters, the Final Onset Parameter and the Initial Onset Parameter, in order to explain the word-final/word-initial differences among languages. We argue that phonological processes, the phonology-morphology interface and their relation to the lexicon are non-arbitrarily explainable in our model thanks to the templates and novel parameters.https://journals.openedition.org/lexis/8058lexicontemplatesconstituent structurephonology-morphology interface
spellingShingle Semra Baturay-Meral
Phonological templates and the lexicon
lexicon
templates
constituent structure
phonology-morphology interface
title Phonological templates and the lexicon
title_full Phonological templates and the lexicon
title_fullStr Phonological templates and the lexicon
title_full_unstemmed Phonological templates and the lexicon
title_short Phonological templates and the lexicon
title_sort phonological templates and the lexicon
topic lexicon
templates
constituent structure
phonology-morphology interface
url https://journals.openedition.org/lexis/8058
work_keys_str_mv AT semrabaturaymeral phonologicaltemplatesandthelexicon