Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device.
Intrauterine devices (IUD) are one of the most common contraceptive methods worldwide. Although adverse events from their use are low, their insertion can cause some complications. Intraperitoneal migration of IUD after transuterine perforation remains one of the most serious events due to the ri...
| Published in: | Batna Journal of Medical Sciences |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Arabic |
| Published: |
Algerian Society of Clinical & Oncological Pharmacy
2024-03-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://batnajms.net/wp-content/uploads/Archives/2024/1/BJMS_Feghoul.pdf |
| _version_ | 1848652443030650880 |
|---|---|
| author | Nabila FEGHOUL Zakaria Seoudi Mourad Derguini Hafida Bendaoud |
| author_facet | Nabila FEGHOUL Zakaria Seoudi Mourad Derguini Hafida Bendaoud |
| author_sort | Nabila FEGHOUL |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Batna Journal of Medical Sciences |
| description | Intrauterine devices (IUD) are one of the most common contraceptive methods
worldwide. Although adverse events from their use are low, their insertion can cause
some complications. Intraperitoneal migration of IUD after transuterine perforation
remains one of the most serious events due to the risks of injury to intraperitoneal
organs and secondary complications. Although the clinical diagnosis of such a
scenario must be recognized in time, it is not always obvious. In most cases, patients
do not express any symptoms. “Missing strings” of the IUD in any patient using this
type of contraceptive is generally the first warning sign and further investigation is
necessary to locate them. When intraperitoneal migration is diagnosed. It should be
kept in mind that most devices can and should be removed even if they are
asymptomatic. In this observation we report the case of a 31year old patient, who
consulted an emergency department for pelvic pain and tenderness of the left iliac
fossa in the days following insertion of an IUD. Following clinical and ultrasound
examination, the diagnosis of intraperitoneal migration of the IUD was accepted and
the device removed by laparoscopic approach. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-d2e00fae2c7b431ebd3114e61fd7287e |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2437-0665 |
| language | Arabic |
| publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
| publisher | Algerian Society of Clinical & Oncological Pharmacy |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-d2e00fae2c7b431ebd3114e61fd7287e2025-11-02T22:39:47ZaraAlgerian Society of Clinical & Oncological PharmacyBatna Journal of Medical Sciences2437-06652024-03-0111110.48087/BJMScr.2024.11110Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device.Nabila FEGHOUL0Zakaria Seoudi1Mourad Derguini2Hafida Bendaoud3Service de Chirurgie Gynécologique - EPH de Kouba - Université d’Alger 1. AlgérieService de Chirurgie Générale CHU Douéra - Université de Blida 1. AlgérieService de Chirurgie Gynécologique - EPH de Kouba - Université d’Alger 1. AlgérieService de Chirurgie Gynécologique - EPH de Kouba - Université d’Alger 1. AlgérieIntrauterine devices (IUD) are one of the most common contraceptive methods worldwide. Although adverse events from their use are low, their insertion can cause some complications. Intraperitoneal migration of IUD after transuterine perforation remains one of the most serious events due to the risks of injury to intraperitoneal organs and secondary complications. Although the clinical diagnosis of such a scenario must be recognized in time, it is not always obvious. In most cases, patients do not express any symptoms. “Missing strings” of the IUD in any patient using this type of contraceptive is generally the first warning sign and further investigation is necessary to locate them. When intraperitoneal migration is diagnosed. It should be kept in mind that most devices can and should be removed even if they are asymptomatic. In this observation we report the case of a 31year old patient, who consulted an emergency department for pelvic pain and tenderness of the left iliac fossa in the days following insertion of an IUD. Following clinical and ultrasound examination, the diagnosis of intraperitoneal migration of the IUD was accepted and the device removed by laparoscopic approach.https://batnajms.net/wp-content/uploads/Archives/2024/1/BJMS_Feghoul.pdfintrauterine contraceptive devicecomplications intrauterine devicemigrationintraperitoneallaparoscopy |
| spellingShingle | Nabila FEGHOUL Zakaria Seoudi Mourad Derguini Hafida Bendaoud Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device. intrauterine contraceptive device complications intrauterine device migration intraperitoneal laparoscopy |
| title | Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device. |
| title_full | Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device. |
| title_fullStr | Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device. |
| title_short | Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device. |
| title_sort | intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device |
| topic | intrauterine contraceptive device complications intrauterine device migration intraperitoneal laparoscopy |
| url | https://batnajms.net/wp-content/uploads/Archives/2024/1/BJMS_Feghoul.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nabilafeghoul intraperitonealmigrationofanintrauterinedevice AT zakariaseoudi intraperitonealmigrationofanintrauterinedevice AT mouradderguini intraperitonealmigrationofanintrauterinedevice AT hafidabendaoud intraperitonealmigrationofanintrauterinedevice |
