Differences between FEV6, FVC and VC at the diagnosis of obstructive ventilatory defect

Introduction The diagnosis of airway obstruction can be made through FEV1/FVC ratio <0.7 or FEV1/VC ratio < lower limit of normality (LLN). Several authors advocate that FEV1/FEV6 ratio is an alternative to diagnosing obstructive ventilatory defect, while others have determined that the best c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pulmonology
Main Authors: C.S. Sousa, D.B. Coelho, P. Amorim, P. Viana, N. Cruz-Martins, M. Drummond
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-03-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.11.008
_version_ 1848652375358701568
author C.S. Sousa
D.B. Coelho
P. Amorim
P. Viana
N. Cruz-Martins
M. Drummond
author_facet C.S. Sousa
D.B. Coelho
P. Amorim
P. Viana
N. Cruz-Martins
M. Drummond
author_sort C.S. Sousa
collection DOAJ
container_title Pulmonology
description Introduction The diagnosis of airway obstruction can be made through FEV1/FVC ratio <0.7 or FEV1/VC ratio < lower limit of normality (LLN). Several authors advocate that FEV1/FEV6 ratio is an alternative to diagnosing obstructive ventilatory defect, while others have determined that the best cut-off for this ratio (best combined sensitivity and specificity) is 0.73.Objective To evaluate the non-inferiority of FEV1/FEV6 ratio < 0.73 when compared to FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.7 and FEV1/VC < LLN in diagnosing airway obstruction.Methods A retrospective analysis of the medical records from patients who underwent spirometry or plethysmography in a university central hospital from June 1st to December 31st, 2018 was carried out. Only medical records which included FEV1/FVC < 0.7 or FEV1/VC < LLN were selected, and these results were compared to FEV1/FEV6 ratio.Results A total of 526 patients with obstructive ventilatory defect were identified by one of the two ratios described. Of these, 95.1%, 87.4% and 88.6% were obstructive by FEV1/FVC, FEV1/VC, and FEV1/FEV6 ratio, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) of FEV1/FEV6 in relation to FEV1/FVC ratio was 99.6% (p < 0.001) with a diagnostic efficacy of 92.8%, whereas the PPV of FEV1/FEV6 in relation to FEV1/VC was 91.0% (p < 0.001) and diagnostic efficacy was 85.2%. Most false negatives, comparing FEV6 with the other two tests, were found in patients with FEV1 > 70% (mild obstruction) and in individuals aged >50 years.Conclusions FEV1/FEV6 < 0.73 may be a good alternative ratio, as it is non-inferior to FEV1/VC and FEV1/FVC in diagnosing obstructive ventilatory defect.
format Article
id doaj-d4fa9f5fcc544e92b7fb3cfaf085d895
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2531-0429
2531-0437
language English
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d4fa9f5fcc544e92b7fb3cfaf085d8952025-11-02T22:53:05ZengTaylor & Francis GroupPulmonology2531-04292531-04372024-03-0130217017310.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.11.008Differences between FEV6, FVC and VC at the diagnosis of obstructive ventilatory defectC.S. Sousa0D.B. Coelho1P. Amorim2P. Viana3N. Cruz-Martins4M. Drummond5Hospital Central do Funchal, PortugalCentro Hospitalar Universitário de São João - Porto, PortugalCentro Hospitalar Universitário de São João - Porto, PortugalCentro Hospitalar Universitário de São João - Porto, PortugalFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, PortugalCentro Hospitalar Universitário de São João - Porto, PortugalIntroduction The diagnosis of airway obstruction can be made through FEV1/FVC ratio <0.7 or FEV1/VC ratio < lower limit of normality (LLN). Several authors advocate that FEV1/FEV6 ratio is an alternative to diagnosing obstructive ventilatory defect, while others have determined that the best cut-off for this ratio (best combined sensitivity and specificity) is 0.73.Objective To evaluate the non-inferiority of FEV1/FEV6 ratio < 0.73 when compared to FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.7 and FEV1/VC < LLN in diagnosing airway obstruction.Methods A retrospective analysis of the medical records from patients who underwent spirometry or plethysmography in a university central hospital from June 1st to December 31st, 2018 was carried out. Only medical records which included FEV1/FVC < 0.7 or FEV1/VC < LLN were selected, and these results were compared to FEV1/FEV6 ratio.Results A total of 526 patients with obstructive ventilatory defect were identified by one of the two ratios described. Of these, 95.1%, 87.4% and 88.6% were obstructive by FEV1/FVC, FEV1/VC, and FEV1/FEV6 ratio, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) of FEV1/FEV6 in relation to FEV1/FVC ratio was 99.6% (p < 0.001) with a diagnostic efficacy of 92.8%, whereas the PPV of FEV1/FEV6 in relation to FEV1/VC was 91.0% (p < 0.001) and diagnostic efficacy was 85.2%. Most false negatives, comparing FEV6 with the other two tests, were found in patients with FEV1 > 70% (mild obstruction) and in individuals aged >50 years.Conclusions FEV1/FEV6 < 0.73 may be a good alternative ratio, as it is non-inferior to FEV1/VC and FEV1/FVC in diagnosing obstructive ventilatory defect.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.11.008SpirometryAirway obstructionObstructive ventilatory defect
spellingShingle C.S. Sousa
D.B. Coelho
P. Amorim
P. Viana
N. Cruz-Martins
M. Drummond
Differences between FEV6, FVC and VC at the diagnosis of obstructive ventilatory defect
Spirometry
Airway obstruction
Obstructive ventilatory defect
title Differences between FEV6, FVC and VC at the diagnosis of obstructive ventilatory defect
title_full Differences between FEV6, FVC and VC at the diagnosis of obstructive ventilatory defect
title_fullStr Differences between FEV6, FVC and VC at the diagnosis of obstructive ventilatory defect
title_full_unstemmed Differences between FEV6, FVC and VC at the diagnosis of obstructive ventilatory defect
title_short Differences between FEV6, FVC and VC at the diagnosis of obstructive ventilatory defect
title_sort differences between fev6 fvc and vc at the diagnosis of obstructive ventilatory defect
topic Spirometry
Airway obstruction
Obstructive ventilatory defect
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.11.008
work_keys_str_mv AT cssousa differencesbetweenfev6fvcandvcatthediagnosisofobstructiveventilatorydefect
AT dbcoelho differencesbetweenfev6fvcandvcatthediagnosisofobstructiveventilatorydefect
AT pamorim differencesbetweenfev6fvcandvcatthediagnosisofobstructiveventilatorydefect
AT pviana differencesbetweenfev6fvcandvcatthediagnosisofobstructiveventilatorydefect
AT ncruzmartins differencesbetweenfev6fvcandvcatthediagnosisofobstructiveventilatorydefect
AT mdrummond differencesbetweenfev6fvcandvcatthediagnosisofobstructiveventilatorydefect