Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding Trays

Objective:The purpose of this study was to compare the production time for indirect digitally and laboratory-produced orthodontic bonding trays.Methods:Orthodontic study casts were used in this study (n=40). The specimens were equally and randomly divided. In the digitally produced indirect bonding...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Main Authors: Julia Plattner, Ahmed Othman, Jassin Arnold, Constantin von See
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Turkish Orthodontic Society 2020-12-01
Subjects:
Online Access: http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparative-study-between-the-overall-production-t/53359
_version_ 1848652225724809216
author Julia Plattner
Ahmed Othman
Jassin Arnold
Constantin von See
author_facet Julia Plattner
Ahmed Othman
Jassin Arnold
Constantin von See
author_sort Julia Plattner
collection DOAJ
container_title Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
description Objective:The purpose of this study was to compare the production time for indirect digitally and laboratory-produced orthodontic bonding trays.Methods:Orthodontic study casts were used in this study (n=40). The specimens were equally and randomly divided. In the digitally produced indirect bonding tray (DIBT) group (n=20), the brackets were set virtually using the Orthoanalyzer program (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) to produce an indirect bonding tray that was virtually designed and 3D printed using VarseoWax® Splint material with a Varseo S 3D printer (Bego, Bremen, Germany). In the laboratory-produced indirect bonding tray (LIBT) group, the brackets were adhesively bonded to the study casts in the dental laboratory (Danube Private University, Krems, Austria), and a transfer bonding silicone tray was manufactured.Results:The t-test results showed a significant difference between the passive time during the production of DIBTs (153.8±32.8 min) and LIBTs (7 min). However, the active production time was 13.6±0.8 min for DIBTs and 17.7±1.9 min for LIBTs. Every individual process step in both groups was measured in minutes, and statistical analysis was performed.Conclusion:The total production time, including active working and passive non-working time, was higher for DIBTs than for LIBTs. However, the actual active production time for DIBTs was shorter than that for LIBTs. Within the study limitations, the digital planning and production of indirect orthodontic trays can be considered a time-efficient production method.
format Article
id doaj-d75d1b4fa511484b9e95a56916e02ab2
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2528-9659
2148-9505
language English
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Turkish Orthodontic Society
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d75d1b4fa511484b9e95a56916e02ab22025-11-02T23:08:11ZengTurkish Orthodontic SocietyTurkish Journal of Orthodontics2528-96592148-95052020-12-0133423223810.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.1807913049054Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding TraysJulia Plattner0Ahmed Othman1Jassin Arnold2Constantin von See3 Private practice, Bressanone, Trentino–Alto Adige, Italy Department of Digital technologies in dentistry and CAD/CAM, Danube Private University, Krems an der Donau, Austria Department of Digital technologies in dentistry and CAD/CAM, Danube Private University, Krems an der Donau, Austria Department of Digital technologies in dentistry and CAD/CAM, Danube Private University, Krems an der Donau, Austria Objective:The purpose of this study was to compare the production time for indirect digitally and laboratory-produced orthodontic bonding trays.Methods:Orthodontic study casts were used in this study (n=40). The specimens were equally and randomly divided. In the digitally produced indirect bonding tray (DIBT) group (n=20), the brackets were set virtually using the Orthoanalyzer program (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) to produce an indirect bonding tray that was virtually designed and 3D printed using VarseoWax® Splint material with a Varseo S 3D printer (Bego, Bremen, Germany). In the laboratory-produced indirect bonding tray (LIBT) group, the brackets were adhesively bonded to the study casts in the dental laboratory (Danube Private University, Krems, Austria), and a transfer bonding silicone tray was manufactured.Results:The t-test results showed a significant difference between the passive time during the production of DIBTs (153.8±32.8 min) and LIBTs (7 min). However, the active production time was 13.6±0.8 min for DIBTs and 17.7±1.9 min for LIBTs. Every individual process step in both groups was measured in minutes, and statistical analysis was performed.Conclusion:The total production time, including active working and passive non-working time, was higher for DIBTs than for LIBTs. However, the actual active production time for DIBTs was shorter than that for LIBTs. Within the study limitations, the digital planning and production of indirect orthodontic trays can be considered a time-efficient production method. http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparative-study-between-the-overall-production-t/53359 3d printingbonding traysdigital orthodonticsindirect bondingproduction time
spellingShingle Julia Plattner
Ahmed Othman
Jassin Arnold
Constantin von See
Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding Trays
3d printing
bonding trays
digital orthodontics
indirect bonding
production time
title Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding Trays
title_full Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding Trays
title_fullStr Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding Trays
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding Trays
title_short Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding Trays
title_sort comparative study between the overall production time of digitally versus conventionally produced indirect orthodontic bonding trays
topic 3d printing
bonding trays
digital orthodontics
indirect bonding
production time
url http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparative-study-between-the-overall-production-t/53359
work_keys_str_mv AT juliaplattner comparativestudybetweentheoverallproductiontimeofdigitallyversusconventionallyproducedindirectorthodonticbondingtrays
AT ahmedothman comparativestudybetweentheoverallproductiontimeofdigitallyversusconventionallyproducedindirectorthodonticbondingtrays
AT jassinarnold comparativestudybetweentheoverallproductiontimeofdigitallyversusconventionallyproducedindirectorthodonticbondingtrays
AT constantinvonsee comparativestudybetweentheoverallproductiontimeofdigitallyversusconventionallyproducedindirectorthodonticbondingtrays