Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding Trays
Objective:The purpose of this study was to compare the production time for indirect digitally and laboratory-produced orthodontic bonding trays.Methods:Orthodontic study casts were used in this study (n=40). The specimens were equally and randomly divided. In the digitally produced indirect bonding...
| Published in: | Turkish Journal of Orthodontics |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Turkish Orthodontic Society
2020-12-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparative-study-between-the-overall-production-t/53359
|
| _version_ | 1848652225724809216 |
|---|---|
| author | Julia Plattner Ahmed Othman Jassin Arnold Constantin von See |
| author_facet | Julia Plattner Ahmed Othman Jassin Arnold Constantin von See |
| author_sort | Julia Plattner |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Turkish Journal of Orthodontics |
| description | Objective:The purpose of this study was to compare the production time for indirect digitally and laboratory-produced orthodontic bonding trays.Methods:Orthodontic study casts were used in this study (n=40). The specimens were equally and randomly divided. In the digitally produced indirect bonding tray (DIBT) group (n=20), the brackets were set virtually using the Orthoanalyzer program (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) to produce an indirect bonding tray that was virtually designed and 3D printed using VarseoWax® Splint material with a Varseo S 3D printer (Bego, Bremen, Germany). In the laboratory-produced indirect bonding tray (LIBT) group, the brackets were adhesively bonded to the study casts in the dental laboratory (Danube Private University, Krems, Austria), and a transfer bonding silicone tray was manufactured.Results:The t-test results showed a significant difference between the passive time during the production of DIBTs (153.8±32.8 min) and LIBTs (7 min). However, the active production time was 13.6±0.8 min for DIBTs and 17.7±1.9 min for LIBTs. Every individual process step in both groups was measured in minutes, and statistical analysis was performed.Conclusion:The total production time, including active working and passive non-working time, was higher for DIBTs than for LIBTs. However, the actual active production time for DIBTs was shorter than that for LIBTs. Within the study limitations, the digital planning and production of indirect orthodontic trays can be considered a time-efficient production method. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-d75d1b4fa511484b9e95a56916e02ab2 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2528-9659 2148-9505 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | Turkish Orthodontic Society |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-d75d1b4fa511484b9e95a56916e02ab22025-11-02T23:08:11ZengTurkish Orthodontic SocietyTurkish Journal of Orthodontics2528-96592148-95052020-12-0133423223810.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.1807913049054Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding TraysJulia Plattner0Ahmed Othman1Jassin Arnold2Constantin von See3 Private practice, Bressanone, Trentino–Alto Adige, Italy Department of Digital technologies in dentistry and CAD/CAM, Danube Private University, Krems an der Donau, Austria Department of Digital technologies in dentistry and CAD/CAM, Danube Private University, Krems an der Donau, Austria Department of Digital technologies in dentistry and CAD/CAM, Danube Private University, Krems an der Donau, Austria Objective:The purpose of this study was to compare the production time for indirect digitally and laboratory-produced orthodontic bonding trays.Methods:Orthodontic study casts were used in this study (n=40). The specimens were equally and randomly divided. In the digitally produced indirect bonding tray (DIBT) group (n=20), the brackets were set virtually using the Orthoanalyzer program (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) to produce an indirect bonding tray that was virtually designed and 3D printed using VarseoWax® Splint material with a Varseo S 3D printer (Bego, Bremen, Germany). In the laboratory-produced indirect bonding tray (LIBT) group, the brackets were adhesively bonded to the study casts in the dental laboratory (Danube Private University, Krems, Austria), and a transfer bonding silicone tray was manufactured.Results:The t-test results showed a significant difference between the passive time during the production of DIBTs (153.8±32.8 min) and LIBTs (7 min). However, the active production time was 13.6±0.8 min for DIBTs and 17.7±1.9 min for LIBTs. Every individual process step in both groups was measured in minutes, and statistical analysis was performed.Conclusion:The total production time, including active working and passive non-working time, was higher for DIBTs than for LIBTs. However, the actual active production time for DIBTs was shorter than that for LIBTs. Within the study limitations, the digital planning and production of indirect orthodontic trays can be considered a time-efficient production method. http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparative-study-between-the-overall-production-t/53359 3d printingbonding traysdigital orthodonticsindirect bondingproduction time |
| spellingShingle | Julia Plattner Ahmed Othman Jassin Arnold Constantin von See Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding Trays 3d printing bonding trays digital orthodontics indirect bonding production time |
| title | Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding Trays |
| title_full | Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding Trays |
| title_fullStr | Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding Trays |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding Trays |
| title_short | Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding Trays |
| title_sort | comparative study between the overall production time of digitally versus conventionally produced indirect orthodontic bonding trays |
| topic | 3d printing bonding trays digital orthodontics indirect bonding production time |
| url |
http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparative-study-between-the-overall-production-t/53359
|
| work_keys_str_mv | AT juliaplattner comparativestudybetweentheoverallproductiontimeofdigitallyversusconventionallyproducedindirectorthodonticbondingtrays AT ahmedothman comparativestudybetweentheoverallproductiontimeofdigitallyversusconventionallyproducedindirectorthodonticbondingtrays AT jassinarnold comparativestudybetweentheoverallproductiontimeofdigitallyversusconventionallyproducedindirectorthodonticbondingtrays AT constantinvonsee comparativestudybetweentheoverallproductiontimeofdigitallyversusconventionallyproducedindirectorthodonticbondingtrays |
