Investigation of the in vitro performance difference of drug-Soluplus® and drug-PEG 6000 dispersions when prepared using spray drying or lyophilization

Purpose: To evaluate the physicochemical and in vitro characteristics of solid dispersions using BCS II model drugs with Soluplus® and one of its component homopolymers, PEG 6000. Methods: Nifedipine (NIF) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) of 99.3% and 99.5% purity, respectively, were selected as BCS II mo...

وصف كامل

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
الحاوية / القاعدة:Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: Mohammad A. Altamimi, Steven H. Neau
التنسيق: مقال
اللغة:الإنجليزية
منشور في: Springer 2017-03-01
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016416301050
_version_ 1848651521829371904
author Mohammad A. Altamimi
Steven H. Neau
author_facet Mohammad A. Altamimi
Steven H. Neau
author_sort Mohammad A. Altamimi
collection DOAJ
container_title Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal
description Purpose: To evaluate the physicochemical and in vitro characteristics of solid dispersions using BCS II model drugs with Soluplus® and one of its component homopolymers, PEG 6000. Methods: Nifedipine (NIF) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) of 99.3% and 99.5% purity, respectively, were selected as BCS II model drugs, such that an improved dissolution rate and concentration in the gastrointestinal tract should increase oral bioavailability. Soluplus® is an amorphous, tri-block, graft co-polymer with polyvinyl caprolactam, polyvinyl acetate, and polyethylene glycol (PCL:PVAc:PEG6000) in the ratio 57:30:13. PEG 6000 (BASF) is a waxy material with melting point of about 60 °C. Solid dispersions were prepared using lyophilization or spray drying techniques. Dissolution study, crystallinity content, and analysis for new chemical bond formation have been used to evaluate the dispersed materials. Results: Although each polymer improved the drug dissolution rate, dissolution from Soluplus® was slower. Enhanced dissolution rates were observed with NIF solid dispersions, but the dissolution profiles were quite different due to the selected technique, polymer, and dissolution medium. For SMX, there was similarity across the dissolution profiles despite the medium, polymer, or applied technique. Each polymer was able to maintain an elevated drug concentration over the three hour duration of the dissolution profile, i.e., supersaturation was supported by the polymer. DSC thermograms revealed no melting endotherm, suggesting that the drug is amorphous or molecularly dispersed. Conclusion: NIF and SMX solid dispersions were successfully prepared by spray drying and lyophilization using Soluplus® or PEG 6000. Each polymer enhanced the drug dissolution rate; NIF dissolution rate was improved to a greater extent. Dispersions with PEG 6000 had a faster dissolution rate due to its hydrophilic nature. DSC analysis showed that no crystalline material exists in the dispersions.
format Article
id doaj-e4c20ae03d67488c9bdc3ff88f5aa53a
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1319-0164
language English
publishDate 2017-03-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e4c20ae03d67488c9bdc3ff88f5aa53a2025-11-03T00:36:41ZengSpringerSaudi Pharmaceutical Journal1319-01642017-03-0125341943910.1016/j.jsps.2016.09.013Investigation of the in vitro performance difference of drug-Soluplus® and drug-PEG 6000 dispersions when prepared using spray drying or lyophilizationMohammad A. Altamimi0Steven H. Neau1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Philadelphia College of Pharmacy, University of the Sciences, 600 S. 43rd Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United StatesDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Philadelphia College of Pharmacy, University of the Sciences, 600 S. 43rd Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United StatesPurpose: To evaluate the physicochemical and in vitro characteristics of solid dispersions using BCS II model drugs with Soluplus® and one of its component homopolymers, PEG 6000. Methods: Nifedipine (NIF) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) of 99.3% and 99.5% purity, respectively, were selected as BCS II model drugs, such that an improved dissolution rate and concentration in the gastrointestinal tract should increase oral bioavailability. Soluplus® is an amorphous, tri-block, graft co-polymer with polyvinyl caprolactam, polyvinyl acetate, and polyethylene glycol (PCL:PVAc:PEG6000) in the ratio 57:30:13. PEG 6000 (BASF) is a waxy material with melting point of about 60 °C. Solid dispersions were prepared using lyophilization or spray drying techniques. Dissolution study, crystallinity content, and analysis for new chemical bond formation have been used to evaluate the dispersed materials. Results: Although each polymer improved the drug dissolution rate, dissolution from Soluplus® was slower. Enhanced dissolution rates were observed with NIF solid dispersions, but the dissolution profiles were quite different due to the selected technique, polymer, and dissolution medium. For SMX, there was similarity across the dissolution profiles despite the medium, polymer, or applied technique. Each polymer was able to maintain an elevated drug concentration over the three hour duration of the dissolution profile, i.e., supersaturation was supported by the polymer. DSC thermograms revealed no melting endotherm, suggesting that the drug is amorphous or molecularly dispersed. Conclusion: NIF and SMX solid dispersions were successfully prepared by spray drying and lyophilization using Soluplus® or PEG 6000. Each polymer enhanced the drug dissolution rate; NIF dissolution rate was improved to a greater extent. Dispersions with PEG 6000 had a faster dissolution rate due to its hydrophilic nature. DSC analysis showed that no crystalline material exists in the dispersions.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016416301050Spray dryingLyophilizationDissolutionNifedipineSulfamethoxazoleSoluplus®PEG 6000Solid dispersion
spellingShingle Mohammad A. Altamimi
Steven H. Neau
Investigation of the in vitro performance difference of drug-Soluplus® and drug-PEG 6000 dispersions when prepared using spray drying or lyophilization
Spray drying
Lyophilization
Dissolution
Nifedipine
Sulfamethoxazole
Soluplus®
PEG 6000
Solid dispersion
title Investigation of the in vitro performance difference of drug-Soluplus® and drug-PEG 6000 dispersions when prepared using spray drying or lyophilization
title_full Investigation of the in vitro performance difference of drug-Soluplus® and drug-PEG 6000 dispersions when prepared using spray drying or lyophilization
title_fullStr Investigation of the in vitro performance difference of drug-Soluplus® and drug-PEG 6000 dispersions when prepared using spray drying or lyophilization
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of the in vitro performance difference of drug-Soluplus® and drug-PEG 6000 dispersions when prepared using spray drying or lyophilization
title_short Investigation of the in vitro performance difference of drug-Soluplus® and drug-PEG 6000 dispersions when prepared using spray drying or lyophilization
title_sort investigation of the in vitro performance difference of drug soluplus r and drug peg 6000 dispersions when prepared using spray drying or lyophilization
topic Spray drying
Lyophilization
Dissolution
Nifedipine
Sulfamethoxazole
Soluplus®
PEG 6000
Solid dispersion
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016416301050
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadaaltamimi investigationoftheinvitroperformancedifferenceofdrugsoluplusanddrugpeg6000dispersionswhenpreparedusingspraydryingorlyophilization
AT stevenhneau investigationoftheinvitroperformancedifferenceofdrugsoluplusanddrugpeg6000dispersionswhenpreparedusingspraydryingorlyophilization