The Two Cultures of Science: Implications for University-Industry Relationships in the U.S. Agriculture Biotechnology

Partnerships between U.S. universities and industries have existed for several decades and in recent years have become generally more varied, wider in scope, more aggressive and experimental and higher in public visibility. In addition, in the last few decades, public and private interests have advo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Integrative Agriculture
Main Authors: William B Lacy, Leland L Glenna, Dina Biscotti, Rick Welsh, Kate Clancy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2014-02-01
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209531191360667X
_version_ 1848651239026327552
author William B Lacy
Leland L Glenna
Dina Biscotti
Rick Welsh
Kate Clancy
author_facet William B Lacy
Leland L Glenna
Dina Biscotti
Rick Welsh
Kate Clancy
author_sort William B Lacy
collection DOAJ
container_title Journal of Integrative Agriculture
description Partnerships between U.S. universities and industries have existed for several decades and in recent years have become generally more varied, wider in scope, more aggressive and experimental and higher in public visibility. In addition, in the last few decades, public and private interests have advocated for government policies and laws to globally promote the commercialization of university science. This paper examines the persistence or convergence of the two cultures of science and the implications of this commercialization for university-industry relationships in agriculture biotechnology. The perceptions and values of over 200 U.S. university and industry scientists, managers and administrators who participate in or oversee research collaborations in agricultural biotechnology were analyzed. The findings revealed that the participants in these research relationships continue to perceive very distinct cultures of science and identify a wide range of concerns and disadvantages of these partnerships. Several actions were discussed to ensure that the two cultures serve complementary roles and that they maximize the public benefits from these increasing collaborations.
format Article
id doaj-eafc60a95bb24aaf96cd477540d5f757
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2095-3119
language English
publishDate 2014-02-01
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eafc60a95bb24aaf96cd477540d5f7572025-11-03T01:15:50ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Journal of Integrative Agriculture2095-31192014-02-0113245546610.1016/S2095-3119(13)60667-XThe Two Cultures of Science: Implications for University-Industry Relationships in the U.S. Agriculture BiotechnologyWilliam B Lacy0Leland L Glenna1Dina Biscotti2Rick Welsh3Kate Clancy4University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Correspondence William B LacyState College, Pennsylvania State University, PA 16801 USAUniversity of California, Davis, CA 95616, USASyracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USAJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD 21218, USAPartnerships between U.S. universities and industries have existed for several decades and in recent years have become generally more varied, wider in scope, more aggressive and experimental and higher in public visibility. In addition, in the last few decades, public and private interests have advocated for government policies and laws to globally promote the commercialization of university science. This paper examines the persistence or convergence of the two cultures of science and the implications of this commercialization for university-industry relationships in agriculture biotechnology. The perceptions and values of over 200 U.S. university and industry scientists, managers and administrators who participate in or oversee research collaborations in agricultural biotechnology were analyzed. The findings revealed that the participants in these research relationships continue to perceive very distinct cultures of science and identify a wide range of concerns and disadvantages of these partnerships. Several actions were discussed to ensure that the two cultures serve complementary roles and that they maximize the public benefits from these increasing collaborations.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209531191360667Xtwo cultures of scienceagricultural biotechnologyuniversity-industry relationships
spellingShingle William B Lacy
Leland L Glenna
Dina Biscotti
Rick Welsh
Kate Clancy
The Two Cultures of Science: Implications for University-Industry Relationships in the U.S. Agriculture Biotechnology
two cultures of science
agricultural biotechnology
university-industry relationships
title The Two Cultures of Science: Implications for University-Industry Relationships in the U.S. Agriculture Biotechnology
title_full The Two Cultures of Science: Implications for University-Industry Relationships in the U.S. Agriculture Biotechnology
title_fullStr The Two Cultures of Science: Implications for University-Industry Relationships in the U.S. Agriculture Biotechnology
title_full_unstemmed The Two Cultures of Science: Implications for University-Industry Relationships in the U.S. Agriculture Biotechnology
title_short The Two Cultures of Science: Implications for University-Industry Relationships in the U.S. Agriculture Biotechnology
title_sort two cultures of science implications for university industry relationships in the u s agriculture biotechnology
topic two cultures of science
agricultural biotechnology
university-industry relationships
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209531191360667X
work_keys_str_mv AT williamblacy thetwoculturesofscienceimplicationsforuniversityindustryrelationshipsintheusagriculturebiotechnology
AT lelandlglenna thetwoculturesofscienceimplicationsforuniversityindustryrelationshipsintheusagriculturebiotechnology
AT dinabiscotti thetwoculturesofscienceimplicationsforuniversityindustryrelationshipsintheusagriculturebiotechnology
AT rickwelsh thetwoculturesofscienceimplicationsforuniversityindustryrelationshipsintheusagriculturebiotechnology
AT kateclancy thetwoculturesofscienceimplicationsforuniversityindustryrelationshipsintheusagriculturebiotechnology
AT williamblacy twoculturesofscienceimplicationsforuniversityindustryrelationshipsintheusagriculturebiotechnology
AT lelandlglenna twoculturesofscienceimplicationsforuniversityindustryrelationshipsintheusagriculturebiotechnology
AT dinabiscotti twoculturesofscienceimplicationsforuniversityindustryrelationshipsintheusagriculturebiotechnology
AT rickwelsh twoculturesofscienceimplicationsforuniversityindustryrelationshipsintheusagriculturebiotechnology
AT kateclancy twoculturesofscienceimplicationsforuniversityindustryrelationshipsintheusagriculturebiotechnology