The case for openness in engineering research [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
In this article, we describe our views on the benefits, and possible downsides, of openness in engineering research. We attempt to examine the issue from multiple perspectives, including reasons and motivations for introducing open practices into an engineering researcher's workflow and the cha...
Main Authors: | Devin R. Berg, Kyle E. Niemeyer |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2018-10-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/7-501/v2 |
Similar Items
-
The nature of the open birth interval distribution [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: John Ross, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 1; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Tony Ross-Hellauer
Published: (2017-04-01) -
What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; referees: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
by: Tony Ross-Hellauer
Published: (2017-08-01) -
Active Acquisition for multimodal neuroimaging [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: James H. Cole, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Cellular agriculture in the UK: a review [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Neil Stephens, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)