An Empirical Assessment of Reviewer 2
According to research lore, the second peer reviewer (Reviewer 2) is believed to rate research manuscripts more harshly than the other reviewers. The purpose of this study was to empirically investigate this common belief. We measured word count, positive phrases, negative phrases, question marks, a...
| Published in: | Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2022-04-01
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580221090393 |