A re-examination of the technical feasibility and economic viability of rapeseed dehulling
The recent success of dehulled sunflower meals on the French market encourages reconsideration of the possibility of applying dehulling techniques to rapeseed. Hulls account for 18−20% of rapeseed mass; they contain mostly fibres (72%, 78% and 99%, respectively of the s...
| Published in: | Oilseeds and fats, crops and lipids |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
EDP Sciences
2015-05-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2014044 |
| _version_ | 1852722449397841920 |
|---|---|
| author | Carré Patrick Quinsac Alain Citeau Morgane Fine Fréderic |
| author_facet | Carré Patrick Quinsac Alain Citeau Morgane Fine Fréderic |
| author_sort | Carré Patrick |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Oilseeds and fats, crops and lipids |
| description | The recent success of dehulled sunflower meals on the French market encourages
reconsideration of the possibility of applying dehulling techniques to rapeseed. Hulls
account for 18−20% of rapeseed
mass; they contain mostly fibres (72%, 78% and 99%, respectively of the seeds’ NDF, ADF
and ADL). Complete removal of these hulls would result in a high (43%) protein meal with
enhanced added value. However, the technical feasibility of producing such a meal is
impeded by the relatively high oil content of the hull fraction. This article presents a
model of mass balance that takes account both of the purity of the “hull” and “kernel”
fractions and comparisons of gross margins between conventional processing and
dehulling-based processing. The value of dehulled rapeseed meal is assessed against both a
range of market scenarios and the composition and price of a selection of alternative
feeds. The gross margin differential favours dehulling only in periods where proteins are
expensive and oil relatively cheap, as at present. Reducing the oil content of the hulls
affects considerably the profitability of dehulling whereas modification of the protein
content has only a modest impact. An important unknown is the effect of antinutritional
factors on the final price of dehulled meals. Management of the glucosinolates residues
through processing might decrease their noxiousness though the information on this is
scant. Since this lack of knowledge is an impediment to the implementation of dehulling
technology, research and development investments should start by addressing this question.
Technical solutions could be developed to recover the oil contained in the hulls. Such
solutions include expelling, aqueous extraction or tail-end dehulling after direct
extraction of the seeds. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-7cf6faefb7cd449fa5f9ee24edd1a72e |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2272-6977 2257-6614 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2015-05-01 |
| publisher | EDP Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-7cf6faefb7cd449fa5f9ee24edd1a72e2025-08-19T21:11:56ZengEDP SciencesOilseeds and fats, crops and lipids2272-69772257-66142015-05-01223D30410.1051/ocl/2014044ocl140101A re-examination of the technical feasibility and economic viability of rapeseed dehullingCarré Patrick0Quinsac Alain1Citeau Morgane2Fine Fréderic3CREOLCETIOMCREOLCETIOMThe recent success of dehulled sunflower meals on the French market encourages reconsideration of the possibility of applying dehulling techniques to rapeseed. Hulls account for 18−20% of rapeseed mass; they contain mostly fibres (72%, 78% and 99%, respectively of the seeds’ NDF, ADF and ADL). Complete removal of these hulls would result in a high (43%) protein meal with enhanced added value. However, the technical feasibility of producing such a meal is impeded by the relatively high oil content of the hull fraction. This article presents a model of mass balance that takes account both of the purity of the “hull” and “kernel” fractions and comparisons of gross margins between conventional processing and dehulling-based processing. The value of dehulled rapeseed meal is assessed against both a range of market scenarios and the composition and price of a selection of alternative feeds. The gross margin differential favours dehulling only in periods where proteins are expensive and oil relatively cheap, as at present. Reducing the oil content of the hulls affects considerably the profitability of dehulling whereas modification of the protein content has only a modest impact. An important unknown is the effect of antinutritional factors on the final price of dehulled meals. Management of the glucosinolates residues through processing might decrease their noxiousness though the information on this is scant. Since this lack of knowledge is an impediment to the implementation of dehulling technology, research and development investments should start by addressing this question. Technical solutions could be developed to recover the oil contained in the hulls. Such solutions include expelling, aqueous extraction or tail-end dehulling after direct extraction of the seeds.http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2014044Rapeseeddehullingproteinsoilprocessinghigh-protein mealfeasibilitygross-margin |
| spellingShingle | Carré Patrick Quinsac Alain Citeau Morgane Fine Fréderic A re-examination of the technical feasibility and economic viability of rapeseed dehulling Rapeseed dehulling proteins oil processing high-protein meal feasibility gross-margin |
| title | A re-examination of the technical feasibility and economic
viability of rapeseed dehulling |
| title_full | A re-examination of the technical feasibility and economic
viability of rapeseed dehulling |
| title_fullStr | A re-examination of the technical feasibility and economic
viability of rapeseed dehulling |
| title_full_unstemmed | A re-examination of the technical feasibility and economic
viability of rapeseed dehulling |
| title_short | A re-examination of the technical feasibility and economic
viability of rapeseed dehulling |
| title_sort | re examination of the technical feasibility and economic viability of rapeseed dehulling |
| topic | Rapeseed dehulling proteins oil processing high-protein meal feasibility gross-margin |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2014044 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT carrepatrick areexaminationofthetechnicalfeasibilityandeconomicviabilityofrapeseeddehulling AT quinsacalain areexaminationofthetechnicalfeasibilityandeconomicviabilityofrapeseeddehulling AT citeaumorgane areexaminationofthetechnicalfeasibilityandeconomicviabilityofrapeseeddehulling AT finefrederic areexaminationofthetechnicalfeasibilityandeconomicviabilityofrapeseeddehulling AT carrepatrick reexaminationofthetechnicalfeasibilityandeconomicviabilityofrapeseeddehulling AT quinsacalain reexaminationofthetechnicalfeasibilityandeconomicviabilityofrapeseeddehulling AT citeaumorgane reexaminationofthetechnicalfeasibilityandeconomicviabilityofrapeseeddehulling AT finefrederic reexaminationofthetechnicalfeasibilityandeconomicviabilityofrapeseeddehulling |
