A re-examination of the technical feasibility and economic viability of rapeseed dehulling

The recent success of dehulled sunflower meals on the French market encourages reconsideration of the possibility of applying dehulling techniques to rapeseed. Hulls account for 18−20% of rapeseed mass; they contain mostly fibres (72%, 78% and 99%, respectively of the s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oilseeds and fats, crops and lipids
Main Authors: Carré Patrick, Quinsac Alain, Citeau Morgane, Fine Fréderic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2015-05-01
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2014044
_version_ 1852722449397841920
author Carré Patrick
Quinsac Alain
Citeau Morgane
Fine Fréderic
author_facet Carré Patrick
Quinsac Alain
Citeau Morgane
Fine Fréderic
author_sort Carré Patrick
collection DOAJ
container_title Oilseeds and fats, crops and lipids
description The recent success of dehulled sunflower meals on the French market encourages reconsideration of the possibility of applying dehulling techniques to rapeseed. Hulls account for 18−20% of rapeseed mass; they contain mostly fibres (72%, 78% and 99%, respectively of the seeds’ NDF, ADF and ADL). Complete removal of these hulls would result in a high (43%) protein meal with enhanced added value. However, the technical feasibility of producing such a meal is impeded by the relatively high oil content of the hull fraction. This article presents a model of mass balance that takes account both of the purity of the “hull” and “kernel” fractions and comparisons of gross margins between conventional processing and dehulling-based processing. The value of dehulled rapeseed meal is assessed against both a range of market scenarios and the composition and price of a selection of alternative feeds. The gross margin differential favours dehulling only in periods where proteins are expensive and oil relatively cheap, as at present. Reducing the oil content of the hulls affects considerably the profitability of dehulling whereas modification of the protein content has only a modest impact. An important unknown is the effect of antinutritional factors on the final price of dehulled meals. Management of the glucosinolates residues through processing might decrease their noxiousness though the information on this is scant. Since this lack of knowledge is an impediment to the implementation of dehulling technology, research and development investments should start by addressing this question. Technical solutions could be developed to recover the oil contained in the hulls. Such solutions include expelling, aqueous extraction or tail-end dehulling after direct extraction of the seeds.
format Article
id doaj-art-7cf6faefb7cd449fa5f9ee24edd1a72e
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2272-6977
2257-6614
language English
publishDate 2015-05-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-7cf6faefb7cd449fa5f9ee24edd1a72e2025-08-19T21:11:56ZengEDP SciencesOilseeds and fats, crops and lipids2272-69772257-66142015-05-01223D30410.1051/ocl/2014044ocl140101A re-examination of the technical feasibility and economic viability of rapeseed dehullingCarré Patrick0Quinsac Alain1Citeau Morgane2Fine Fréderic3CREOLCETIOMCREOLCETIOMThe recent success of dehulled sunflower meals on the French market encourages reconsideration of the possibility of applying dehulling techniques to rapeseed. Hulls account for 18−20% of rapeseed mass; they contain mostly fibres (72%, 78% and 99%, respectively of the seeds’ NDF, ADF and ADL). Complete removal of these hulls would result in a high (43%) protein meal with enhanced added value. However, the technical feasibility of producing such a meal is impeded by the relatively high oil content of the hull fraction. This article presents a model of mass balance that takes account both of the purity of the “hull” and “kernel” fractions and comparisons of gross margins between conventional processing and dehulling-based processing. The value of dehulled rapeseed meal is assessed against both a range of market scenarios and the composition and price of a selection of alternative feeds. The gross margin differential favours dehulling only in periods where proteins are expensive and oil relatively cheap, as at present. Reducing the oil content of the hulls affects considerably the profitability of dehulling whereas modification of the protein content has only a modest impact. An important unknown is the effect of antinutritional factors on the final price of dehulled meals. Management of the glucosinolates residues through processing might decrease their noxiousness though the information on this is scant. Since this lack of knowledge is an impediment to the implementation of dehulling technology, research and development investments should start by addressing this question. Technical solutions could be developed to recover the oil contained in the hulls. Such solutions include expelling, aqueous extraction or tail-end dehulling after direct extraction of the seeds.http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2014044Rapeseeddehullingproteinsoilprocessinghigh-protein mealfeasibilitygross-margin
spellingShingle Carré Patrick
Quinsac Alain
Citeau Morgane
Fine Fréderic
A re-examination of the technical feasibility and economic viability of rapeseed dehulling
Rapeseed
dehulling
proteins
oil
processing
high-protein meal
feasibility
gross-margin
title A re-examination of the technical feasibility and economic viability of rapeseed dehulling
title_full A re-examination of the technical feasibility and economic viability of rapeseed dehulling
title_fullStr A re-examination of the technical feasibility and economic viability of rapeseed dehulling
title_full_unstemmed A re-examination of the technical feasibility and economic viability of rapeseed dehulling
title_short A re-examination of the technical feasibility and economic viability of rapeseed dehulling
title_sort re examination of the technical feasibility and economic viability of rapeseed dehulling
topic Rapeseed
dehulling
proteins
oil
processing
high-protein meal
feasibility
gross-margin
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2014044
work_keys_str_mv AT carrepatrick areexaminationofthetechnicalfeasibilityandeconomicviabilityofrapeseeddehulling
AT quinsacalain areexaminationofthetechnicalfeasibilityandeconomicviabilityofrapeseeddehulling
AT citeaumorgane areexaminationofthetechnicalfeasibilityandeconomicviabilityofrapeseeddehulling
AT finefrederic areexaminationofthetechnicalfeasibilityandeconomicviabilityofrapeseeddehulling
AT carrepatrick reexaminationofthetechnicalfeasibilityandeconomicviabilityofrapeseeddehulling
AT quinsacalain reexaminationofthetechnicalfeasibilityandeconomicviabilityofrapeseeddehulling
AT citeaumorgane reexaminationofthetechnicalfeasibilityandeconomicviabilityofrapeseeddehulling
AT finefrederic reexaminationofthetechnicalfeasibilityandeconomicviabilityofrapeseeddehulling