Skip to content
  • Home
  • Book Bag: 0 items (Full)
    • English
    • 日本語
    • 中文(简体)
    • 中文(繁體)
    • اللغة العربية
  • About
Advanced
  • On two approaches to the study...
  • Cite this
  • Text this
  • Print
  • Export Record
    • Export to RefWorks
    • Export to EndNoteWeb
    • Export to EndNote
  • Add to Book Bag Remove from Book Bag
  • Permanent link

On two approaches to the study of the history of philosophy (reply to prof. K. M. Antonov)

This paper is a polemic answer to professor K. Antonov published in the volume 74 of this Journal

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия I. Богословие, философия
Main Author: Maxim Bulanenko
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: St. Tikhon's Orthodox University 2018-12-01
Subjects:
Киреевский
история философии
немецкий идеализм
гегельянство
вера
Online Access:http://periodical.pstgu.ru/ru/pdf/article/6485
  • Holdings
  • Description
  • Similar Items
  • Staff View

Internet

http://periodical.pstgu.ru/ru/pdf/article/6485

Similar Items

  • Actualisation of classic vs. academic history of philosophy (with reference to the article of deacon M. Bulanenko)
    by: Konstantin Antonov
    Published: (2017-12-01)
  • Formation of history of Chinese philosophy as academic discipline in China
    by: V A Kiselev
    Published: (2017-12-01)
  • Concepts of “chaos” and “evil” correlation in history of philosophical thought
    by: A V Kulik
    Published: (2014-12-01)
  • Учение Ф. Шлегеля о способах взаиодействия с хаосом
    by: A. Kulik
    Published: (2013-03-01)
  • IMAGE OF INDIAN PHILOSOPHY IN THE WORKS BY BANKIMCHANDRA CHATTOPADDHYAY
    by: T G Skorokhodova
    Published: (2017-12-01)

Search Options

  • Search History
  • Advanced Search

Find More

  • Browse the Catalog
  • Browse Alphabetically
  • Explore Channels
  • Course Reserves
  • New Items

Need Help?

  • Search Tips
  • Ask a Librarian
  • FAQs