Holacracy, a modern form of organizational governance predictors for person-organization-fit and job satisfaction

This study compares illegitimate tasks and appreciation in traditional work organisations and holacracy work organisations based in Switzerland and Germany. In addition, the study tests whether the fit between employees and holacracy organisations depends on personality characteristics. Ninety-five...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
出版年:Frontiers in Psychology
主要な著者: Lena Weirauch, Sibylle Galliker, Achim Elfering
フォーマット: 論文
言語:英語
出版事項: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-01
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1021545/full
_version_ 1852666401719844864
author Lena Weirauch
Sibylle Galliker
Achim Elfering
author_facet Lena Weirauch
Sibylle Galliker
Achim Elfering
author_sort Lena Weirauch
collection DOAJ
container_title Frontiers in Psychology
description This study compares illegitimate tasks and appreciation in traditional work organisations and holacracy work organisations based in Switzerland and Germany. In addition, the study tests whether the fit between employees and holacracy organisations depends on personality characteristics. Ninety-five employees working in holacratic companies participated in an online survey with standardised questionnaires on illegitimate tasks, Big Five personality dimensions, perceived holacracy satisfaction and person–organisation fit. For the comparison of illegitimate tasks and appreciation, a propensity-matching comparison group of people working in traditional companies was used. The results revealed significantly lower illegitimate tasks t(53) = −2.04, p < 0.05, with a lower level (2.49) in holacracy than in traditional work (2.78). Concerning appreciation, the results showed significantly higher values for holacratic (5.33) than for traditional work [4.14, t(53) = 4.86, p < 0.001]. Multiple linear regression of holacracy satisfaction on personality dimensions showed neuroticism (b = −4.72, p = 0.006) as a significant predictor. Agreeableness showed marginally significant results (b = 2.39, p = 0.06). This indicates that people scoring low on neuroticism and high in agreeableness may thrive better in holacracy organisations. Based on the results, theoretical and practical implications as for example implications for corporates hiring strategy, are discussed. Finally, this study presents numerous directions for future research.
format Article
id doaj-art-e861c36e26914f129b0df3109eafd4fb
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1664-1078
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e861c36e26914f129b0df3109eafd4fb2025-08-19T21:35:04ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-01-011310.3389/fpsyg.2022.10215451021545Holacracy, a modern form of organizational governance predictors for person-organization-fit and job satisfactionLena WeirauchSibylle GallikerAchim ElferingThis study compares illegitimate tasks and appreciation in traditional work organisations and holacracy work organisations based in Switzerland and Germany. In addition, the study tests whether the fit between employees and holacracy organisations depends on personality characteristics. Ninety-five employees working in holacratic companies participated in an online survey with standardised questionnaires on illegitimate tasks, Big Five personality dimensions, perceived holacracy satisfaction and person–organisation fit. For the comparison of illegitimate tasks and appreciation, a propensity-matching comparison group of people working in traditional companies was used. The results revealed significantly lower illegitimate tasks t(53) = −2.04, p < 0.05, with a lower level (2.49) in holacracy than in traditional work (2.78). Concerning appreciation, the results showed significantly higher values for holacratic (5.33) than for traditional work [4.14, t(53) = 4.86, p < 0.001]. Multiple linear regression of holacracy satisfaction on personality dimensions showed neuroticism (b = −4.72, p = 0.006) as a significant predictor. Agreeableness showed marginally significant results (b = 2.39, p = 0.06). This indicates that people scoring low on neuroticism and high in agreeableness may thrive better in holacracy organisations. Based on the results, theoretical and practical implications as for example implications for corporates hiring strategy, are discussed. Finally, this study presents numerous directions for future research.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1021545/fullperson–organisation fitholacracyself-organisationbig fivejob satisfaction
spellingShingle Lena Weirauch
Sibylle Galliker
Achim Elfering
Holacracy, a modern form of organizational governance predictors for person-organization-fit and job satisfaction
person–organisation fit
holacracy
self-organisation
big five
job satisfaction
title Holacracy, a modern form of organizational governance predictors for person-organization-fit and job satisfaction
title_full Holacracy, a modern form of organizational governance predictors for person-organization-fit and job satisfaction
title_fullStr Holacracy, a modern form of organizational governance predictors for person-organization-fit and job satisfaction
title_full_unstemmed Holacracy, a modern form of organizational governance predictors for person-organization-fit and job satisfaction
title_short Holacracy, a modern form of organizational governance predictors for person-organization-fit and job satisfaction
title_sort holacracy a modern form of organizational governance predictors for person organization fit and job satisfaction
topic person–organisation fit
holacracy
self-organisation
big five
job satisfaction
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1021545/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lenaweirauch holacracyamodernformoforganizationalgovernancepredictorsforpersonorganizationfitandjobsatisfaction
AT sibyllegalliker holacracyamodernformoforganizationalgovernancepredictorsforpersonorganizationfitandjobsatisfaction
AT achimelfering holacracyamodernformoforganizationalgovernancepredictorsforpersonorganizationfitandjobsatisfaction