Hydro-structural issues in the design of ultra large container ships

ABSTRACT: The structural design of the ships includes two main issues which should be checked carefully, namely the extreme structural response (yielding & buckling) and the fatigue structural response. Even if the corresponding failure modes are fundamentally different, the overall methodologie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sime Malenica, Quentin Derbanne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2014-12-01
Series:International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2092678216302679
id doaj-0007b8d6b14c46579415ccb6095fc633
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0007b8d6b14c46579415ccb6095fc6332020-11-25T01:08:00ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering2092-67822014-12-0164983999Hydro-structural issues in the design of ultra large container shipsSime Malenica0Quentin Derbanne1Bureau Veritas, Paris, FRANCE; Corresponding authorBureau Veritas, Paris, FRANCEABSTRACT: The structural design of the ships includes two main issues which should be checked carefully, namely the extreme structural response (yielding & buckling) and the fatigue structural response. Even if the corresponding failure modes are fundamentally different, the overall methodologies for their evaluation have many common points. Both issues require application of two main steps: deterministic calculations of hydro-structure interactions for given operating conditions on one side and the statistical post-processing in order to take into account the lifetime operational profile, on the other side. In the case of ultra large ships such as the container ships and in addition to the classical quasi-static type of structural responses the hydroelastic structural response becomes important. This is due to several reasons among which the following are the most important: the increase of the flexibility due to their large dimensions (Lpp close to 400 m) which leads to the lower structural natural frequencies, very large operational speed (20 knots) and large bow flare (increased slamming loads). The correct modeling of the hydroelastic ship structural response, and its inclusion into the overall design procedure, is significantly more complex than the evaluation of the quasi static structural response. The present paper gives an overview of the different tools and methods which are used in nowadays practice. KEY WORDS: Hydro-structure interactions, Hydroelasticity, Springing, Whipping, Slamming, Potential flow, Boundary integral equation method, Finite element method, CFD, Model tests, Full scale measurementshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2092678216302679
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sime Malenica
Quentin Derbanne
spellingShingle Sime Malenica
Quentin Derbanne
Hydro-structural issues in the design of ultra large container ships
International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering
author_facet Sime Malenica
Quentin Derbanne
author_sort Sime Malenica
title Hydro-structural issues in the design of ultra large container ships
title_short Hydro-structural issues in the design of ultra large container ships
title_full Hydro-structural issues in the design of ultra large container ships
title_fullStr Hydro-structural issues in the design of ultra large container ships
title_full_unstemmed Hydro-structural issues in the design of ultra large container ships
title_sort hydro-structural issues in the design of ultra large container ships
publisher Elsevier
series International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering
issn 2092-6782
publishDate 2014-12-01
description ABSTRACT: The structural design of the ships includes two main issues which should be checked carefully, namely the extreme structural response (yielding & buckling) and the fatigue structural response. Even if the corresponding failure modes are fundamentally different, the overall methodologies for their evaluation have many common points. Both issues require application of two main steps: deterministic calculations of hydro-structure interactions for given operating conditions on one side and the statistical post-processing in order to take into account the lifetime operational profile, on the other side. In the case of ultra large ships such as the container ships and in addition to the classical quasi-static type of structural responses the hydroelastic structural response becomes important. This is due to several reasons among which the following are the most important: the increase of the flexibility due to their large dimensions (Lpp close to 400 m) which leads to the lower structural natural frequencies, very large operational speed (20 knots) and large bow flare (increased slamming loads). The correct modeling of the hydroelastic ship structural response, and its inclusion into the overall design procedure, is significantly more complex than the evaluation of the quasi static structural response. The present paper gives an overview of the different tools and methods which are used in nowadays practice. KEY WORDS: Hydro-structure interactions, Hydroelasticity, Springing, Whipping, Slamming, Potential flow, Boundary integral equation method, Finite element method, CFD, Model tests, Full scale measurements
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2092678216302679
work_keys_str_mv AT simemalenica hydrostructuralissuesinthedesignofultralargecontainerships
AT quentinderbanne hydrostructuralissuesinthedesignofultralargecontainerships
_version_ 1725184859111948288