Urban Aboriginal Creation Stories and History: contesting the past and the present. The Eleventh Doireann MacDermott Lecture

This paper is based on the 11th annual Doireann MacDermott public lecture presented at the Universitat de Barcelona in November, 2010. It is a critique of discourses and representations in Australian society, and indeed, embedded in all western societies (and many non-western societies I suspect)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kristina Everett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitat de Barcelona 2011-08-01
Series:Coolabah
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/coolabah/article/view/15651/18768
id doaj-000f6e9d9cd54476af2f9a0ca336762c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-000f6e9d9cd54476af2f9a0ca336762c2020-11-25T01:11:38ZengUniversitat de BarcelonaCoolabah1988-59462011-08-01711410.1344/co201171-14Urban Aboriginal Creation Stories and History: contesting the past and the present. The Eleventh Doireann MacDermott LectureKristina Everett0Macquarie UniversityThis paper is based on the 11th annual Doireann MacDermott public lecture presented at the Universitat de Barcelona in November, 2010. It is a critique of discourses and representations in Australian society, and indeed, embedded in all western societies (and many non-western societies I suspect) which support and reinforce artificial binary oppositions which make up social structures and institutions. Binary oppositions reinforce oppositional power dynamics, making one term positive and the other negative, not recognizing categories in-between. Linguistically, for example, the terms ‘Indigenous’ and ‘non-Indigenous’ articulate a false dichotomy between people who, empirically, are not two discrete groups, but rather, multiple groups within each category which interact within and between groups in complex and fluid engagements. The discourses and representations I discuss in this paper articulate imaginary binary oppositions out of social processes and identities which are, in fact, very similar. However, because these discourses and representations are constructed by different social groups with unequal power relationships they are treated as opposites, one with a higher value than the other. In this paper I am primarily concerned with history and myth, and in two related ‘stories’, the Lachlan Macquarie story, classified as history because it is primarily written and ‘belongs’ to the dominant Australian society, and the Maria Locke story, classified as myth because it is primarily oral, and explains the emergence and characteristics of a group of Aboriginal people who claim traditional Aboriginal ownership of a large part of what is today called Sydney. http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/coolabah/article/view/15651/18768Lachlan MacquarieMaria LockeAbriginal Peoples
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kristina Everett
spellingShingle Kristina Everett
Urban Aboriginal Creation Stories and History: contesting the past and the present. The Eleventh Doireann MacDermott Lecture
Coolabah
Lachlan Macquarie
Maria Locke
Abriginal Peoples
author_facet Kristina Everett
author_sort Kristina Everett
title Urban Aboriginal Creation Stories and History: contesting the past and the present. The Eleventh Doireann MacDermott Lecture
title_short Urban Aboriginal Creation Stories and History: contesting the past and the present. The Eleventh Doireann MacDermott Lecture
title_full Urban Aboriginal Creation Stories and History: contesting the past and the present. The Eleventh Doireann MacDermott Lecture
title_fullStr Urban Aboriginal Creation Stories and History: contesting the past and the present. The Eleventh Doireann MacDermott Lecture
title_full_unstemmed Urban Aboriginal Creation Stories and History: contesting the past and the present. The Eleventh Doireann MacDermott Lecture
title_sort urban aboriginal creation stories and history: contesting the past and the present. the eleventh doireann macdermott lecture
publisher Universitat de Barcelona
series Coolabah
issn 1988-5946
publishDate 2011-08-01
description This paper is based on the 11th annual Doireann MacDermott public lecture presented at the Universitat de Barcelona in November, 2010. It is a critique of discourses and representations in Australian society, and indeed, embedded in all western societies (and many non-western societies I suspect) which support and reinforce artificial binary oppositions which make up social structures and institutions. Binary oppositions reinforce oppositional power dynamics, making one term positive and the other negative, not recognizing categories in-between. Linguistically, for example, the terms ‘Indigenous’ and ‘non-Indigenous’ articulate a false dichotomy between people who, empirically, are not two discrete groups, but rather, multiple groups within each category which interact within and between groups in complex and fluid engagements. The discourses and representations I discuss in this paper articulate imaginary binary oppositions out of social processes and identities which are, in fact, very similar. However, because these discourses and representations are constructed by different social groups with unequal power relationships they are treated as opposites, one with a higher value than the other. In this paper I am primarily concerned with history and myth, and in two related ‘stories’, the Lachlan Macquarie story, classified as history because it is primarily written and ‘belongs’ to the dominant Australian society, and the Maria Locke story, classified as myth because it is primarily oral, and explains the emergence and characteristics of a group of Aboriginal people who claim traditional Aboriginal ownership of a large part of what is today called Sydney.
topic Lachlan Macquarie
Maria Locke
Abriginal Peoples
url http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/coolabah/article/view/15651/18768
work_keys_str_mv AT kristinaeverett urbanaboriginalcreationstoriesandhistorycontestingthepastandthepresenttheeleventhdoireannmacdermottlecture
_version_ 1725170484396425216