Plasmodium vivax Transmission in Africa.

Malaria in sub-Saharan Africa has historically been almost exclusively attributed to Plasmodium falciparum (Pf). Current diagnostic and surveillance systems in much of sub-Saharan Africa are not designed to identify or report non-Pf human malaria infections accurately, resulting in a dearth of routi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rosalind E Howes, Robert C Reiner, Katherine E Battle, Joshua Longbottom, Bonnie Mappin, Dariya Ordanovich, Andrew J Tatem, Chris Drakeley, Peter W Gething, Peter A Zimmerman, David L Smith, Simon I Hay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-11-01
Series:PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4654493?pdf=render
id doaj-0022f52489fc4fafb1b27e1ecd1eb78c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0022f52489fc4fafb1b27e1ecd1eb78c2020-11-25T02:08:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases1935-27271935-27352015-11-01911e000422210.1371/journal.pntd.0004222Plasmodium vivax Transmission in Africa.Rosalind E HowesRobert C ReinerKatherine E BattleJoshua LongbottomBonnie MappinDariya OrdanovichAndrew J TatemChris DrakeleyPeter W GethingPeter A ZimmermanDavid L SmithSimon I HayMalaria in sub-Saharan Africa has historically been almost exclusively attributed to Plasmodium falciparum (Pf). Current diagnostic and surveillance systems in much of sub-Saharan Africa are not designed to identify or report non-Pf human malaria infections accurately, resulting in a dearth of routine epidemiological data about their significance. The high prevalence of Duffy negativity provided a rationale for excluding the possibility of Plasmodium vivax (Pv) transmission. However, review of varied evidence sources including traveller infections, community prevalence surveys, local clinical case reports, entomological and serological studies contradicts this viewpoint. Here, these data reports are weighted in a unified framework to reflect the strength of evidence of indigenous Pv transmission in terms of diagnostic specificity, size of individual reports and corroboration between evidence sources. Direct evidence was reported from 21 of the 47 malaria-endemic countries studied, while 42 countries were attributed with infections of visiting travellers. Overall, moderate to conclusive evidence of transmission was available from 18 countries, distributed across all parts of the continent. Approximately 86.6 million Duffy positive hosts were at risk of infection in Africa in 2015. Analysis of the mechanisms sustaining Pv transmission across this continent of low frequency of susceptible hosts found that reports of Pv prevalence were consistent with transmission being potentially limited to Duffy positive populations. Finally, reports of apparent Duffy-independent transmission are discussed. While Pv is evidently not a major malaria parasite across most of sub-Saharan Africa, the evidence presented here highlights its widespread low-level endemicity. An increased awareness of Pv as a potential malaria parasite, coupled with policy shifts towards species-specific diagnostics and reporting, will allow a robust assessment of the public health significance of Pv, as well as the other neglected non-Pf parasites, which are currently invisible to most public health authorities in Africa, but which can cause severe clinical illness and require specific control interventions.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4654493?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rosalind E Howes
Robert C Reiner
Katherine E Battle
Joshua Longbottom
Bonnie Mappin
Dariya Ordanovich
Andrew J Tatem
Chris Drakeley
Peter W Gething
Peter A Zimmerman
David L Smith
Simon I Hay
spellingShingle Rosalind E Howes
Robert C Reiner
Katherine E Battle
Joshua Longbottom
Bonnie Mappin
Dariya Ordanovich
Andrew J Tatem
Chris Drakeley
Peter W Gething
Peter A Zimmerman
David L Smith
Simon I Hay
Plasmodium vivax Transmission in Africa.
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
author_facet Rosalind E Howes
Robert C Reiner
Katherine E Battle
Joshua Longbottom
Bonnie Mappin
Dariya Ordanovich
Andrew J Tatem
Chris Drakeley
Peter W Gething
Peter A Zimmerman
David L Smith
Simon I Hay
author_sort Rosalind E Howes
title Plasmodium vivax Transmission in Africa.
title_short Plasmodium vivax Transmission in Africa.
title_full Plasmodium vivax Transmission in Africa.
title_fullStr Plasmodium vivax Transmission in Africa.
title_full_unstemmed Plasmodium vivax Transmission in Africa.
title_sort plasmodium vivax transmission in africa.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
issn 1935-2727
1935-2735
publishDate 2015-11-01
description Malaria in sub-Saharan Africa has historically been almost exclusively attributed to Plasmodium falciparum (Pf). Current diagnostic and surveillance systems in much of sub-Saharan Africa are not designed to identify or report non-Pf human malaria infections accurately, resulting in a dearth of routine epidemiological data about their significance. The high prevalence of Duffy negativity provided a rationale for excluding the possibility of Plasmodium vivax (Pv) transmission. However, review of varied evidence sources including traveller infections, community prevalence surveys, local clinical case reports, entomological and serological studies contradicts this viewpoint. Here, these data reports are weighted in a unified framework to reflect the strength of evidence of indigenous Pv transmission in terms of diagnostic specificity, size of individual reports and corroboration between evidence sources. Direct evidence was reported from 21 of the 47 malaria-endemic countries studied, while 42 countries were attributed with infections of visiting travellers. Overall, moderate to conclusive evidence of transmission was available from 18 countries, distributed across all parts of the continent. Approximately 86.6 million Duffy positive hosts were at risk of infection in Africa in 2015. Analysis of the mechanisms sustaining Pv transmission across this continent of low frequency of susceptible hosts found that reports of Pv prevalence were consistent with transmission being potentially limited to Duffy positive populations. Finally, reports of apparent Duffy-independent transmission are discussed. While Pv is evidently not a major malaria parasite across most of sub-Saharan Africa, the evidence presented here highlights its widespread low-level endemicity. An increased awareness of Pv as a potential malaria parasite, coupled with policy shifts towards species-specific diagnostics and reporting, will allow a robust assessment of the public health significance of Pv, as well as the other neglected non-Pf parasites, which are currently invisible to most public health authorities in Africa, but which can cause severe clinical illness and require specific control interventions.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4654493?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT rosalindehowes plasmodiumvivaxtransmissioninafrica
AT robertcreiner plasmodiumvivaxtransmissioninafrica
AT katherineebattle plasmodiumvivaxtransmissioninafrica
AT joshualongbottom plasmodiumvivaxtransmissioninafrica
AT bonniemappin plasmodiumvivaxtransmissioninafrica
AT dariyaordanovich plasmodiumvivaxtransmissioninafrica
AT andrewjtatem plasmodiumvivaxtransmissioninafrica
AT chrisdrakeley plasmodiumvivaxtransmissioninafrica
AT peterwgething plasmodiumvivaxtransmissioninafrica
AT peterazimmerman plasmodiumvivaxtransmissioninafrica
AT davidlsmith plasmodiumvivaxtransmissioninafrica
AT simonihay plasmodiumvivaxtransmissioninafrica
_version_ 1724926262136274944