Incidental findings, genetic screening and the challenge of personalisation
Genetic tests frequently produce more information than is initially expected. Several documents have addressed this issue and offer suggestions regarding how this information should be managed and, in particular, concerning the expedience of revealing (or not revealing) it to the persons concerned....
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Istituto Superiore di Sanità
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-25712014000400003&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-0024c10f35784be681edd8fdf351c4cb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0024c10f35784be681edd8fdf351c4cb2020-11-25T04:00:13ZengIstituto Superiore di SanitàAnnali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità0021-25712014-12-0150431231610.4415/ANN_14_04_03S0021-25712014000400003Incidental findings, genetic screening and the challenge of personalisationCarlo Petrini0Enrico Alleva1Istituto Superiore di SanitàIstituto Superiore di SanitàGenetic tests frequently produce more information than is initially expected. Several documents have addressed this issue and offer suggestions regarding how this information should be managed and, in particular, concerning the expedience of revealing (or not revealing) it to the persons concerned. While the approaches to the management of these incidental findings (IFs) vary, it is usually recommended that the information be disclosed if there is confirmed clinical utility and the possibility of treatment or prevention. However, this leaves unsolved some fundamental issues such as the different ways of interpreting "clinical utility", countless sources of uncertainty and varying ways of defining the notion of "incidental". Guidelines and other reference documents can offer indications to those responsible for managing IFs but should not be allowed to relieve researchers and healthcare professionals of their responsibilities.http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-25712014000400003&lng=en&tlng=enbioethicsgenetic screeningincidental findingsresearch |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Carlo Petrini Enrico Alleva |
spellingShingle |
Carlo Petrini Enrico Alleva Incidental findings, genetic screening and the challenge of personalisation Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità bioethics genetic screening incidental findings research |
author_facet |
Carlo Petrini Enrico Alleva |
author_sort |
Carlo Petrini |
title |
Incidental findings, genetic screening and the challenge of personalisation |
title_short |
Incidental findings, genetic screening and the challenge of personalisation |
title_full |
Incidental findings, genetic screening and the challenge of personalisation |
title_fullStr |
Incidental findings, genetic screening and the challenge of personalisation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Incidental findings, genetic screening and the challenge of personalisation |
title_sort |
incidental findings, genetic screening and the challenge of personalisation |
publisher |
Istituto Superiore di Sanità |
series |
Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità |
issn |
0021-2571 |
publishDate |
2014-12-01 |
description |
Genetic tests frequently produce more information than is initially expected. Several documents have addressed this issue and offer suggestions regarding how this information should be managed and, in particular, concerning the expedience of revealing (or not revealing) it to the persons concerned. While the approaches to the management of these incidental findings (IFs) vary, it is usually recommended that the information be disclosed if there is confirmed clinical utility and the possibility of treatment or prevention. However, this leaves unsolved some fundamental issues such as the different ways of interpreting "clinical utility", countless sources of uncertainty and varying ways of defining the notion of "incidental". Guidelines and other reference documents can offer indications to those responsible for managing IFs but should not be allowed to relieve researchers and healthcare professionals of their responsibilities. |
topic |
bioethics genetic screening incidental findings research |
url |
http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-25712014000400003&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT carlopetrini incidentalfindingsgeneticscreeningandthechallengeofpersonalisation AT enricoalleva incidentalfindingsgeneticscreeningandthechallengeofpersonalisation |
_version_ |
1724451789176045568 |