Incidental findings, genetic screening and the challenge of personalisation

Genetic tests frequently produce more information than is initially expected. Several documents have addressed this issue and offer suggestions regarding how this information should be managed and, in particular, concerning the expedience of revealing (or not revealing) it to the persons concerned....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlo Petrini, Enrico Alleva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Istituto Superiore di Sanità 2014-12-01
Series:Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-25712014000400003&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-0024c10f35784be681edd8fdf351c4cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0024c10f35784be681edd8fdf351c4cb2020-11-25T04:00:13ZengIstituto Superiore di SanitàAnnali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità0021-25712014-12-0150431231610.4415/ANN_14_04_03S0021-25712014000400003Incidental findings, genetic screening and the challenge of personalisationCarlo Petrini0Enrico Alleva1Istituto Superiore di SanitàIstituto Superiore di SanitàGenetic tests frequently produce more information than is initially expected. Several documents have addressed this issue and offer suggestions regarding how this information should be managed and, in particular, concerning the expedience of revealing (or not revealing) it to the persons concerned. While the approaches to the management of these incidental findings (IFs) vary, it is usually recommended that the information be disclosed if there is confirmed clinical utility and the possibility of treatment or prevention. However, this leaves unsolved some fundamental issues such as the different ways of interpreting "clinical utility", countless sources of uncertainty and varying ways of defining the notion of "incidental". Guidelines and other reference documents can offer indications to those responsible for managing IFs but should not be allowed to relieve researchers and healthcare professionals of their responsibilities.http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-25712014000400003&lng=en&tlng=enbioethicsgenetic screeningincidental findingsresearch
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carlo Petrini
Enrico Alleva
spellingShingle Carlo Petrini
Enrico Alleva
Incidental findings, genetic screening and the challenge of personalisation
Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
bioethics
genetic screening
incidental findings
research
author_facet Carlo Petrini
Enrico Alleva
author_sort Carlo Petrini
title Incidental findings, genetic screening and the challenge of personalisation
title_short Incidental findings, genetic screening and the challenge of personalisation
title_full Incidental findings, genetic screening and the challenge of personalisation
title_fullStr Incidental findings, genetic screening and the challenge of personalisation
title_full_unstemmed Incidental findings, genetic screening and the challenge of personalisation
title_sort incidental findings, genetic screening and the challenge of personalisation
publisher Istituto Superiore di Sanità
series Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
issn 0021-2571
publishDate 2014-12-01
description Genetic tests frequently produce more information than is initially expected. Several documents have addressed this issue and offer suggestions regarding how this information should be managed and, in particular, concerning the expedience of revealing (or not revealing) it to the persons concerned. While the approaches to the management of these incidental findings (IFs) vary, it is usually recommended that the information be disclosed if there is confirmed clinical utility and the possibility of treatment or prevention. However, this leaves unsolved some fundamental issues such as the different ways of interpreting "clinical utility", countless sources of uncertainty and varying ways of defining the notion of "incidental". Guidelines and other reference documents can offer indications to those responsible for managing IFs but should not be allowed to relieve researchers and healthcare professionals of their responsibilities.
topic bioethics
genetic screening
incidental findings
research
url http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-25712014000400003&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT carlopetrini incidentalfindingsgeneticscreeningandthechallengeofpersonalisation
AT enricoalleva incidentalfindingsgeneticscreeningandthechallengeofpersonalisation
_version_ 1724451789176045568