REPEATABILITY OF THE FRENCH HIGHER VEGETATION TYPES ACCORDING

Higher vegetation types are generally determined by successive approximations and defined by a common consent. Instead, they might be statistically determined and repeated, according to a numerical method called ‘socio-ecology’. This method deals only with floristical data, but g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. BRISSE, G. GRANDJOUAN, P. DE RUFFRAY
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University La Sapienza of Rome 1998-04-01
Series:Annali di Botanica
Online Access:http://ojs.uniroma1.it/index.php/Annalidibotanica/article/view/9036
id doaj-003113f726234379b94915f1c0a9f6e5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-003113f726234379b94915f1c0a9f6e52020-11-24T22:51:58ZengUniversity La Sapienza of RomeAnnali di Botanica0365-08122239-31291998-04-0156010.4462/annbotrm-90369059REPEATABILITY OF THE FRENCH HIGHER VEGETATION TYPES ACCORDINGH. BRISSEG. GRANDJOUANP. DE RUFFRAYHigher vegetation types are generally determined by successive approximations and defined by a common consent. Instead, they might be statistically determined and repeated, according to a numerical method called ‘socio-ecology’. This method deals only with floristical data, but gives them an ecological meaning by a previous calibration of the relations between plants, computed as ecological indices. It is applied to a pair of two homologous samples, each having 2.000 relevés and coming from the 60.000 relevés stored in the French data bank ‘Sophy’. Each sample covers the main ecological gradients of the bank, it defines a hierarchy of vegetation types and it explains half the peculiarity of a type with only 10 to 30 discriminant plants, out of the 5.000 plants observed in the relevés. Results : 1) The discriminant plants may characterize the vegetation types, including the higher ones, in a coherent and readable form. 2) In the two independent classifications, having different structures, the same vegetation types are repeated. They are the reciprocal nearest types, in the socio-ecological space. Though the two classifications have no one relevé in common, the repeated types have nearly the same discriminant plants. 3) At the highest level, two clear-cut main types show the difference between light and shadow. The same herbaceous discriminant plants, for a type, and the ligneous or sciaphilous ones, for the other, have similar fidelities and constancies in the two classifications. 4) Such a numerical agreement, instead of common consent, appears again in the sub-types, which remind the classical ones, but which are repeatable.http://ojs.uniroma1.it/index.php/Annalidibotanica/article/view/9036
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H. BRISSE
G. GRANDJOUAN
P. DE RUFFRAY
spellingShingle H. BRISSE
G. GRANDJOUAN
P. DE RUFFRAY
REPEATABILITY OF THE FRENCH HIGHER VEGETATION TYPES ACCORDING
Annali di Botanica
author_facet H. BRISSE
G. GRANDJOUAN
P. DE RUFFRAY
author_sort H. BRISSE
title REPEATABILITY OF THE FRENCH HIGHER VEGETATION TYPES ACCORDING
title_short REPEATABILITY OF THE FRENCH HIGHER VEGETATION TYPES ACCORDING
title_full REPEATABILITY OF THE FRENCH HIGHER VEGETATION TYPES ACCORDING
title_fullStr REPEATABILITY OF THE FRENCH HIGHER VEGETATION TYPES ACCORDING
title_full_unstemmed REPEATABILITY OF THE FRENCH HIGHER VEGETATION TYPES ACCORDING
title_sort repeatability of the french higher vegetation types according
publisher University La Sapienza of Rome
series Annali di Botanica
issn 0365-0812
2239-3129
publishDate 1998-04-01
description Higher vegetation types are generally determined by successive approximations and defined by a common consent. Instead, they might be statistically determined and repeated, according to a numerical method called ‘socio-ecology’. This method deals only with floristical data, but gives them an ecological meaning by a previous calibration of the relations between plants, computed as ecological indices. It is applied to a pair of two homologous samples, each having 2.000 relevés and coming from the 60.000 relevés stored in the French data bank ‘Sophy’. Each sample covers the main ecological gradients of the bank, it defines a hierarchy of vegetation types and it explains half the peculiarity of a type with only 10 to 30 discriminant plants, out of the 5.000 plants observed in the relevés. Results : 1) The discriminant plants may characterize the vegetation types, including the higher ones, in a coherent and readable form. 2) In the two independent classifications, having different structures, the same vegetation types are repeated. They are the reciprocal nearest types, in the socio-ecological space. Though the two classifications have no one relevé in common, the repeated types have nearly the same discriminant plants. 3) At the highest level, two clear-cut main types show the difference between light and shadow. The same herbaceous discriminant plants, for a type, and the ligneous or sciaphilous ones, for the other, have similar fidelities and constancies in the two classifications. 4) Such a numerical agreement, instead of common consent, appears again in the sub-types, which remind the classical ones, but which are repeatable.
url http://ojs.uniroma1.it/index.php/Annalidibotanica/article/view/9036
work_keys_str_mv AT hbrisse repeatabilityofthefrenchhighervegetationtypesaccording
AT ggrandjouan repeatabilityofthefrenchhighervegetationtypesaccording
AT pderuffray repeatabilityofthefrenchhighervegetationtypesaccording
_version_ 1725667873022541824