The “black box” of treatment: Patients’ perspective on what works in opioid maintenance treatment for opioid dependence
Abstract Background A lack of conceptual modeling of how the components of opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) for opioid dependence (OD) work causes it to occasionally be labeled the “black-box” of treatment. This study had a two-fold objective: First, to analyze which factors related to OMT for OD...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-021-00378-7 |
id |
doaj-003643cfd5154abd9bb32de1060f200e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-003643cfd5154abd9bb32de1060f200e2021-05-11T14:52:43ZengBMCSubstance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy1747-597X2021-05-0116111510.1186/s13011-021-00378-7The “black box” of treatment: Patients’ perspective on what works in opioid maintenance treatment for opioid dependenceTeresa C. Silva0Fredrik B. Andersson1Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Mid Sweden UniversityDepartment of Humanities and Social Sciences, Mid Sweden UniversityAbstract Background A lack of conceptual modeling of how the components of opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) for opioid dependence (OD) work causes it to occasionally be labeled the “black-box” of treatment. This study had a two-fold objective: First, to analyze which factors related to OMT for OD contribute to the abstinence of problematic use of non-prescribed opioids and sustain recovery, from the patients’ perspective; second, to understand which changes OMT produced in the individuals’ lives might significantly contribute to relapse prevention. Methods We used qualitative methods of design, inquiry, and analysis from a convenience sample of 19 individuals in a Swedish treatment setting. Results All the participants reported previous cycles of problematic use of non-prescribed opioids and other non-prescribed psychoactive substances, treatment, abstinence, recovery, and relapse before starting the current OMT program. During the pre-treatment stage, specific events, internal processes, and social environments enhanced motivation toward abstinence and seeking treatment. During the treatment stage, participants perceived the quality of the human relationships established with primary social groups as important as medication and the individual plan of care in sustaining recovery. From the participants’ perspective, OMT was a turning point in their life course, allowing them a sense of self-fulfillment and the reconstruction of personal and social identity. However, they still struggled with the stigmatization produced by a society that values abstinence-oriented over medication-assisted treatments. Conclusion OMT is not an isolated event in individuals’ lives but rather a process occurring within a specific social context. Structural factors and the sense of acceptance and belonging are essential in supporting the transformation. Treatment achievements and the risk for relapse vary over time, so the objectives of the treatment plan must account for characteristics of the pre-treatment stage and the availability and capacity of individuals to restructure their social network, besides the opioid maintenance treatment and institutional social care.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-021-00378-7Opioid maintenance treatmentOpioid dependenceSubstance use disordersPatient perspectiveQuality of life |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Teresa C. Silva Fredrik B. Andersson |
spellingShingle |
Teresa C. Silva Fredrik B. Andersson The “black box” of treatment: Patients’ perspective on what works in opioid maintenance treatment for opioid dependence Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy Opioid maintenance treatment Opioid dependence Substance use disorders Patient perspective Quality of life |
author_facet |
Teresa C. Silva Fredrik B. Andersson |
author_sort |
Teresa C. Silva |
title |
The “black box” of treatment: Patients’ perspective on what works in opioid maintenance treatment for opioid dependence |
title_short |
The “black box” of treatment: Patients’ perspective on what works in opioid maintenance treatment for opioid dependence |
title_full |
The “black box” of treatment: Patients’ perspective on what works in opioid maintenance treatment for opioid dependence |
title_fullStr |
The “black box” of treatment: Patients’ perspective on what works in opioid maintenance treatment for opioid dependence |
title_full_unstemmed |
The “black box” of treatment: Patients’ perspective on what works in opioid maintenance treatment for opioid dependence |
title_sort |
“black box” of treatment: patients’ perspective on what works in opioid maintenance treatment for opioid dependence |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy |
issn |
1747-597X |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
Abstract Background A lack of conceptual modeling of how the components of opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) for opioid dependence (OD) work causes it to occasionally be labeled the “black-box” of treatment. This study had a two-fold objective: First, to analyze which factors related to OMT for OD contribute to the abstinence of problematic use of non-prescribed opioids and sustain recovery, from the patients’ perspective; second, to understand which changes OMT produced in the individuals’ lives might significantly contribute to relapse prevention. Methods We used qualitative methods of design, inquiry, and analysis from a convenience sample of 19 individuals in a Swedish treatment setting. Results All the participants reported previous cycles of problematic use of non-prescribed opioids and other non-prescribed psychoactive substances, treatment, abstinence, recovery, and relapse before starting the current OMT program. During the pre-treatment stage, specific events, internal processes, and social environments enhanced motivation toward abstinence and seeking treatment. During the treatment stage, participants perceived the quality of the human relationships established with primary social groups as important as medication and the individual plan of care in sustaining recovery. From the participants’ perspective, OMT was a turning point in their life course, allowing them a sense of self-fulfillment and the reconstruction of personal and social identity. However, they still struggled with the stigmatization produced by a society that values abstinence-oriented over medication-assisted treatments. Conclusion OMT is not an isolated event in individuals’ lives but rather a process occurring within a specific social context. Structural factors and the sense of acceptance and belonging are essential in supporting the transformation. Treatment achievements and the risk for relapse vary over time, so the objectives of the treatment plan must account for characteristics of the pre-treatment stage and the availability and capacity of individuals to restructure their social network, besides the opioid maintenance treatment and institutional social care. |
topic |
Opioid maintenance treatment Opioid dependence Substance use disorders Patient perspective Quality of life |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-021-00378-7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT teresacsilva theblackboxoftreatmentpatientsperspectiveonwhatworksinopioidmaintenancetreatmentforopioiddependence AT fredrikbandersson theblackboxoftreatmentpatientsperspectiveonwhatworksinopioidmaintenancetreatmentforopioiddependence AT teresacsilva blackboxoftreatmentpatientsperspectiveonwhatworksinopioidmaintenancetreatmentforopioiddependence AT fredrikbandersson blackboxoftreatmentpatientsperspectiveonwhatworksinopioidmaintenancetreatmentforopioiddependence |
_version_ |
1721443825566613504 |