Metode Penafsiran Ibn al-‘Arabî dalam Ahkâm al-Qur’ân
This paper will explain the concept of ontological Ibn al-‘Arabi of interpretation, the general idea of the book <em>Ah</em><em>kâm al-Qur’ân</em> that includes methods, patterns, sources of interpretation, interpretation elements and characteristics that distinguish it from...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Indonesian |
Published: |
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
2015-09-01
|
Series: | Mutawatir |
Online Access: | http://mutawatir.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/Mutawatir/article/view/44 |
id |
doaj-0046e4f9bcbd4feca945b403dfd63fa5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0046e4f9bcbd4feca945b403dfd63fa52020-11-24T22:46:06ZindUniversitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel SurabayaMutawatir2088-75232502-63212015-09-013224826543Metode Penafsiran Ibn al-‘Arabî dalam Ahkâm al-Qur’ânSaiful Fahmi0Pondok Pesantren al-Ikhlas Bone, SulawesiThis paper will explain the concept of ontological Ibn al-‘Arabi of interpretation, the general idea of the book <em>Ah</em><em>kâm al-Qur’ân</em> that includes methods, patterns, sources of interpretation, interpretation elements and characteristics that distinguish it from the interpreters other. Ontological view regarding the interpretation that was never a logical consequence of the importance of the final carry was critical of the existing interpretation of the results so far, so it is legitimate to question whether <em>Ah</em><em>kâm al-Qur’ân</em> is still relevant to the demands of his time or not? Whether in it there is coercion-coercion and preconceptions-ideological Ibn al-‘Arabî or not? Given, <em>Ah</em><em>kâm al-Qur’ân</em> is reproduced in the 5th century AH, where the fight discourse between the schools of thought Islam was at its height. While Ibn al-‘Arabi is an intellectual who embrace genuine Mâlikî School, so it brought the prejudice that he is stuck in an ideological reasonhttp://mutawatir.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/Mutawatir/article/view/44 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Indonesian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Saiful Fahmi |
spellingShingle |
Saiful Fahmi Metode Penafsiran Ibn al-‘Arabî dalam Ahkâm al-Qur’ân Mutawatir |
author_facet |
Saiful Fahmi |
author_sort |
Saiful Fahmi |
title |
Metode Penafsiran Ibn al-‘Arabî dalam Ahkâm al-Qur’ân |
title_short |
Metode Penafsiran Ibn al-‘Arabî dalam Ahkâm al-Qur’ân |
title_full |
Metode Penafsiran Ibn al-‘Arabî dalam Ahkâm al-Qur’ân |
title_fullStr |
Metode Penafsiran Ibn al-‘Arabî dalam Ahkâm al-Qur’ân |
title_full_unstemmed |
Metode Penafsiran Ibn al-‘Arabî dalam Ahkâm al-Qur’ân |
title_sort |
metode penafsiran ibn al-‘arabî dalam ahkâm al-qur’ân |
publisher |
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya |
series |
Mutawatir |
issn |
2088-7523 2502-6321 |
publishDate |
2015-09-01 |
description |
This paper will explain the concept of ontological Ibn al-‘Arabi of interpretation, the general idea of the book <em>Ah</em><em>kâm al-Qur’ân</em> that includes methods, patterns, sources of interpretation, interpretation elements and characteristics that distinguish it from the interpreters other. Ontological view regarding the interpretation that was never a logical consequence of the importance of the final carry was critical of the existing interpretation of the results so far, so it is legitimate to question whether <em>Ah</em><em>kâm al-Qur’ân</em> is still relevant to the demands of his time or not? Whether in it there is coercion-coercion and preconceptions-ideological Ibn al-‘Arabî or not? Given, <em>Ah</em><em>kâm al-Qur’ân</em> is reproduced in the 5th century AH, where the fight discourse between the schools of thought Islam was at its height. While Ibn al-‘Arabi is an intellectual who embrace genuine Mâlikî School, so it brought the prejudice that he is stuck in an ideological reason |
url |
http://mutawatir.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/Mutawatir/article/view/44 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT saifulfahmi metodepenafsiranibnalarabidalamahkamalquran |
_version_ |
1725686216742928384 |