Effect of different frequencies of fluoride dentifrice and mouthrinse administration: an in situ study

The effect of a combination of topical fluoridation methods for inhibition of enamel demineralization in the face of a cariogenic challenge has not been clearly established. This in situ crossover study aimed to assess whether the addition of daily use of fluoride mouthrinse (FR) to that of fluoride...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniela Correia Cavalcante Souza, Lina Naomi Hashizume, Morjana Eidelwein, Marisa Maltz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica 2010-12-01
Series:Brazilian Oral Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242010000400003
id doaj-004df4615c70410fa84002fb969a1dc5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-004df4615c70410fa84002fb969a1dc52020-11-24T23:09:12ZengSociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica Brazilian Oral Research1806-83242010-12-0124438839310.1590/S1806-83242010000400003Effect of different frequencies of fluoride dentifrice and mouthrinse administration: an in situ studyDaniela Correia Cavalcante SouzaLina Naomi HashizumeMorjana EidelweinMarisa MaltzThe effect of a combination of topical fluoridation methods for inhibition of enamel demineralization in the face of a cariogenic challenge has not been clearly established. This in situ crossover study aimed to assess whether the addition of daily use of fluoride mouthrinse (FR) to that of fluoride dentifrice (FD) is equivalent to increasing the frequency of FD application in terms of the effect on enamel demineralization and fluoride content. Over 3 phases of 14 days each, 12 volunteers wore appliances containing enamel blocks exposed to a 20 % sucrose solution 8 times/day. During each phase the blocks underwent one of the following treatments: 2x/day FD, 2x/day FD + 1x/day FR, and 3x/day FD. The blocks were assessed for hardness and fluoride content. Three x/day FD did not differ from 2x/day + 1x/day FR, however it enhanced demineralization protection when compared to 2x/day FD. All treatments produced an increase in enamel fluoride content compared to no treatment (sound blocks) (p < 0.05), but the differences between them were not significant. The results of this study suggest that the daily use of fluoride mouthrinse combined with that of fluoride dentifrice has similar effects on enamel demineralization and fluoride content when compared to increasing the frequency of fluoride dentifrice use.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242010000400003FluoridesDentifricesMouthwashesDental Caries
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniela Correia Cavalcante Souza
Lina Naomi Hashizume
Morjana Eidelwein
Marisa Maltz
spellingShingle Daniela Correia Cavalcante Souza
Lina Naomi Hashizume
Morjana Eidelwein
Marisa Maltz
Effect of different frequencies of fluoride dentifrice and mouthrinse administration: an in situ study
Brazilian Oral Research
Fluorides
Dentifrices
Mouthwashes
Dental Caries
author_facet Daniela Correia Cavalcante Souza
Lina Naomi Hashizume
Morjana Eidelwein
Marisa Maltz
author_sort Daniela Correia Cavalcante Souza
title Effect of different frequencies of fluoride dentifrice and mouthrinse administration: an in situ study
title_short Effect of different frequencies of fluoride dentifrice and mouthrinse administration: an in situ study
title_full Effect of different frequencies of fluoride dentifrice and mouthrinse administration: an in situ study
title_fullStr Effect of different frequencies of fluoride dentifrice and mouthrinse administration: an in situ study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different frequencies of fluoride dentifrice and mouthrinse administration: an in situ study
title_sort effect of different frequencies of fluoride dentifrice and mouthrinse administration: an in situ study
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica
series Brazilian Oral Research
issn 1806-8324
publishDate 2010-12-01
description The effect of a combination of topical fluoridation methods for inhibition of enamel demineralization in the face of a cariogenic challenge has not been clearly established. This in situ crossover study aimed to assess whether the addition of daily use of fluoride mouthrinse (FR) to that of fluoride dentifrice (FD) is equivalent to increasing the frequency of FD application in terms of the effect on enamel demineralization and fluoride content. Over 3 phases of 14 days each, 12 volunteers wore appliances containing enamel blocks exposed to a 20 % sucrose solution 8 times/day. During each phase the blocks underwent one of the following treatments: 2x/day FD, 2x/day FD + 1x/day FR, and 3x/day FD. The blocks were assessed for hardness and fluoride content. Three x/day FD did not differ from 2x/day + 1x/day FR, however it enhanced demineralization protection when compared to 2x/day FD. All treatments produced an increase in enamel fluoride content compared to no treatment (sound blocks) (p < 0.05), but the differences between them were not significant. The results of this study suggest that the daily use of fluoride mouthrinse combined with that of fluoride dentifrice has similar effects on enamel demineralization and fluoride content when compared to increasing the frequency of fluoride dentifrice use.
topic Fluorides
Dentifrices
Mouthwashes
Dental Caries
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242010000400003
work_keys_str_mv AT danielacorreiacavalcantesouza effectofdifferentfrequenciesoffluoridedentifriceandmouthrinseadministrationaninsitustudy
AT linanaomihashizume effectofdifferentfrequenciesoffluoridedentifriceandmouthrinseadministrationaninsitustudy
AT morjanaeidelwein effectofdifferentfrequenciesoffluoridedentifriceandmouthrinseadministrationaninsitustudy
AT marisamaltz effectofdifferentfrequenciesoffluoridedentifriceandmouthrinseadministrationaninsitustudy
_version_ 1725610896985686016