Drosophila increase exploration after visually detecting predators.
Novel stimuli elicit behaviors that are collectively known as specific exploration. These behaviors allow the animal to become more familiar with the novel objects within its environment. Specific exploration is frequently suppressed by defensive reactions to predator cues. Herein, we examine if thi...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5528251?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-005c2d70d06f4be39ac6405b6d581e48 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-005c2d70d06f4be39ac6405b6d581e482020-11-24T21:36:17ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01127e018074910.1371/journal.pone.0180749Drosophila increase exploration after visually detecting predators.Miguel de la FlorLijian ChenClaire Manson-BishopTzu-Chun ChuKathya ZamoraDanielle RobbinsGemunu GunaratneGregg RomanNovel stimuli elicit behaviors that are collectively known as specific exploration. These behaviors allow the animal to become more familiar with the novel objects within its environment. Specific exploration is frequently suppressed by defensive reactions to predator cues. Herein, we examine if this suppression occurs in Drosophila melanogaster by measuring the response of these flies to wild harvested predators. The flies used in our experiments have been cultured and had not lived under predator threat for multiple decades. In a circular arena with centrally-caged predators, wild type Drosophila actively avoided the pantropical jumping spider, Plexippus paykulli, and the Texas unicorn mantis, Phyllovates chlorophaena, indicating an innate defensive reaction to these predators. Interestingly, wild type Drosophila males also avoided a centrally-caged mock spider, and the avoidance of the mock spider became exaggerated when it was made to move within the cage. Visually impaired Drosophila failed to detect and avoid the Plexippus paykulli and the moving mock spider, while the broadly anosmic orco2 mutants were fully capable of detecting and avoiding Plexippus paykulli, indicating that these flies principally relied upon vison to perceive the predator stimuli. During early exploration of the arena, exploratory activity increased in the presence of Plexippus paykulli and the moving mock spider. The elevated activity induced by Plexippus paykulli disappeared after the fly had finished exploring, suggesting the flies were capable of habituating the predator cues. Taken together, these results indicate that despite being isolated from predators for decades Drosophila will visually detect these predators, retain innate defensive behaviors, respond by increasing exploratory activity in the arena rather than suppressing activity, and may habituate to normal predator cues.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5528251?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Miguel de la Flor Lijian Chen Claire Manson-Bishop Tzu-Chun Chu Kathya Zamora Danielle Robbins Gemunu Gunaratne Gregg Roman |
spellingShingle |
Miguel de la Flor Lijian Chen Claire Manson-Bishop Tzu-Chun Chu Kathya Zamora Danielle Robbins Gemunu Gunaratne Gregg Roman Drosophila increase exploration after visually detecting predators. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Miguel de la Flor Lijian Chen Claire Manson-Bishop Tzu-Chun Chu Kathya Zamora Danielle Robbins Gemunu Gunaratne Gregg Roman |
author_sort |
Miguel de la Flor |
title |
Drosophila increase exploration after visually detecting predators. |
title_short |
Drosophila increase exploration after visually detecting predators. |
title_full |
Drosophila increase exploration after visually detecting predators. |
title_fullStr |
Drosophila increase exploration after visually detecting predators. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Drosophila increase exploration after visually detecting predators. |
title_sort |
drosophila increase exploration after visually detecting predators. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
Novel stimuli elicit behaviors that are collectively known as specific exploration. These behaviors allow the animal to become more familiar with the novel objects within its environment. Specific exploration is frequently suppressed by defensive reactions to predator cues. Herein, we examine if this suppression occurs in Drosophila melanogaster by measuring the response of these flies to wild harvested predators. The flies used in our experiments have been cultured and had not lived under predator threat for multiple decades. In a circular arena with centrally-caged predators, wild type Drosophila actively avoided the pantropical jumping spider, Plexippus paykulli, and the Texas unicorn mantis, Phyllovates chlorophaena, indicating an innate defensive reaction to these predators. Interestingly, wild type Drosophila males also avoided a centrally-caged mock spider, and the avoidance of the mock spider became exaggerated when it was made to move within the cage. Visually impaired Drosophila failed to detect and avoid the Plexippus paykulli and the moving mock spider, while the broadly anosmic orco2 mutants were fully capable of detecting and avoiding Plexippus paykulli, indicating that these flies principally relied upon vison to perceive the predator stimuli. During early exploration of the arena, exploratory activity increased in the presence of Plexippus paykulli and the moving mock spider. The elevated activity induced by Plexippus paykulli disappeared after the fly had finished exploring, suggesting the flies were capable of habituating the predator cues. Taken together, these results indicate that despite being isolated from predators for decades Drosophila will visually detect these predators, retain innate defensive behaviors, respond by increasing exploratory activity in the arena rather than suppressing activity, and may habituate to normal predator cues. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5528251?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT migueldelaflor drosophilaincreaseexplorationaftervisuallydetectingpredators AT lijianchen drosophilaincreaseexplorationaftervisuallydetectingpredators AT clairemansonbishop drosophilaincreaseexplorationaftervisuallydetectingpredators AT tzuchunchu drosophilaincreaseexplorationaftervisuallydetectingpredators AT kathyazamora drosophilaincreaseexplorationaftervisuallydetectingpredators AT daniellerobbins drosophilaincreaseexplorationaftervisuallydetectingpredators AT gemunugunaratne drosophilaincreaseexplorationaftervisuallydetectingpredators AT greggroman drosophilaincreaseexplorationaftervisuallydetectingpredators |
_version_ |
1725941923999383552 |