The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations

One of the prescriptions for adaptive comanagement of social-ecological systems is to follow a bioregional approach. In water resources management, experience has been gained with a bioregional approach by the foundation of river basin organizations (RBOs). Here, we summarize the results of a resear...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sander Meijerink, Dave Huitema
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2017-06-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss2/art41/
id doaj-005d89dd33ba4a9696c2fe6708f0d789
record_format Article
spelling doaj-005d89dd33ba4a9696c2fe6708f0d7892020-11-24T22:51:15ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872017-06-012224110.5751/ES-09388-2202419388The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizationsSander Meijerink0Dave Huitema1Institute for Management Research, Radboud UniversityVU University AmsterdamOne of the prescriptions for adaptive comanagement of social-ecological systems is to follow a bioregional approach. In water resources management, experience has been gained with a bioregional approach by the foundation of river basin organizations (RBOs). Here, we summarize the results of a research project involving 27 colleagues who have undertaken an analysis of the global discussion on RBOs and the foundation of RBOs in Canada, USA, Great Britain, Germany, Portugal, South Africa, Ukraine, Afghanistan, Mongolia, Thailand, and Australia. Drawing on Ostrom's institutional analysis and development framework, we first present a fine-grained analysis of the institutional architecture of these RBOs, which enables us to distinguish between autonomous, coordinating, partnership, and agency type RBOs. Second, we unravel the main controversies over this architecture by focusing on the key actors involved in either promoting or hindering RBO formation, globally and at the national level. Third, we summarize how the performance of RBOs can be evaluated in terms of coordination, accountability, legitimacy, and environmental effectiveness. Finally, we discuss the relationship between institutional design and performance. The main findings are: (1) the foundation of RBOs is not a neutral process but rather a highly political one, (2) the foundation of RBOs creates complex accountability relationships, and (3) institutional interplay, the capacity to generate financial resources, and a minimum degree of institutional stability are crucial to the successes of RBOs in realizing coordination and environmental effectiveness.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss2/art41/accountabilitybioregional approachinstitutional analysisinstitutional interplayriver basin organizations
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sander Meijerink
Dave Huitema
spellingShingle Sander Meijerink
Dave Huitema
The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations
Ecology and Society
accountability
bioregional approach
institutional analysis
institutional interplay
river basin organizations
author_facet Sander Meijerink
Dave Huitema
author_sort Sander Meijerink
title The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations
title_short The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations
title_full The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations
title_fullStr The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations
title_full_unstemmed The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations
title_sort institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2017-06-01
description One of the prescriptions for adaptive comanagement of social-ecological systems is to follow a bioregional approach. In water resources management, experience has been gained with a bioregional approach by the foundation of river basin organizations (RBOs). Here, we summarize the results of a research project involving 27 colleagues who have undertaken an analysis of the global discussion on RBOs and the foundation of RBOs in Canada, USA, Great Britain, Germany, Portugal, South Africa, Ukraine, Afghanistan, Mongolia, Thailand, and Australia. Drawing on Ostrom's institutional analysis and development framework, we first present a fine-grained analysis of the institutional architecture of these RBOs, which enables us to distinguish between autonomous, coordinating, partnership, and agency type RBOs. Second, we unravel the main controversies over this architecture by focusing on the key actors involved in either promoting or hindering RBO formation, globally and at the national level. Third, we summarize how the performance of RBOs can be evaluated in terms of coordination, accountability, legitimacy, and environmental effectiveness. Finally, we discuss the relationship between institutional design and performance. The main findings are: (1) the foundation of RBOs is not a neutral process but rather a highly political one, (2) the foundation of RBOs creates complex accountability relationships, and (3) institutional interplay, the capacity to generate financial resources, and a minimum degree of institutional stability are crucial to the successes of RBOs in realizing coordination and environmental effectiveness.
topic accountability
bioregional approach
institutional analysis
institutional interplay
river basin organizations
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss2/art41/
work_keys_str_mv AT sandermeijerink theinstitutionaldesignpoliticsandeffectsofabioregionalapproachobservationsandlessonsfrom11casestudiesofriverbasinorganizations
AT davehuitema theinstitutionaldesignpoliticsandeffectsofabioregionalapproachobservationsandlessonsfrom11casestudiesofriverbasinorganizations
AT sandermeijerink institutionaldesignpoliticsandeffectsofabioregionalapproachobservationsandlessonsfrom11casestudiesofriverbasinorganizations
AT davehuitema institutionaldesignpoliticsandeffectsofabioregionalapproachobservationsandlessonsfrom11casestudiesofriverbasinorganizations
_version_ 1716456360524120064