Geomechanics of subsidence above single and multi-seam coal mining

Accurate prediction of surface subsidence due to the extraction of underground coal seams is a significant challenge in geotechnical engineering. This task is further compounded by the growing trend for coal to be extracted from seams either above or below previously extracted coal seams, a practice...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A.M. Suchowerska Iwanec, J.P. Carter, J.P. Hambleton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-06-01
Series:Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775516000159
id doaj-005e8fa76fc34776941b6668dad27402
record_format Article
spelling doaj-005e8fa76fc34776941b6668dad274022020-11-24T23:47:37ZengElsevierJournal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering1674-77552016-06-018330431310.1016/j.jrmge.2015.11.007Geomechanics of subsidence above single and multi-seam coal miningA.M. Suchowerska Iwanec0J.P. Carter1J.P. Hambleton2Golder Associates, Sydney, AustraliaARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science and Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, AustraliaARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science and Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, AustraliaAccurate prediction of surface subsidence due to the extraction of underground coal seams is a significant challenge in geotechnical engineering. This task is further compounded by the growing trend for coal to be extracted from seams either above or below previously extracted coal seams, a practice known as multi-seam mining. In order to accurately predict the subsidence above single and multi-seam longwall panels using numerical methods, constitutive laws need to appropriately represent the mechanical behaviour of coal measure strata. The choice of the most appropriate model is not always straightforward. This paper compares predictions of surface subsidence obtained using the finite element method, considering a range of well-known constitutive models. The results show that more sophisticated and numerically taxing constitutive laws do not necessarily lead to more accurate predictions of subsidence when compared to field measurements. The advantages and limitations of using each particular constitutive law are discussed. A comparison of the numerical predictions and field measurements of surface subsidence is also provided.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775516000159MiningCoalLongwall miningSubsidenceMulti-seam miningConstitutive modelling
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A.M. Suchowerska Iwanec
J.P. Carter
J.P. Hambleton
spellingShingle A.M. Suchowerska Iwanec
J.P. Carter
J.P. Hambleton
Geomechanics of subsidence above single and multi-seam coal mining
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Mining
Coal
Longwall mining
Subsidence
Multi-seam mining
Constitutive modelling
author_facet A.M. Suchowerska Iwanec
J.P. Carter
J.P. Hambleton
author_sort A.M. Suchowerska Iwanec
title Geomechanics of subsidence above single and multi-seam coal mining
title_short Geomechanics of subsidence above single and multi-seam coal mining
title_full Geomechanics of subsidence above single and multi-seam coal mining
title_fullStr Geomechanics of subsidence above single and multi-seam coal mining
title_full_unstemmed Geomechanics of subsidence above single and multi-seam coal mining
title_sort geomechanics of subsidence above single and multi-seam coal mining
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
issn 1674-7755
publishDate 2016-06-01
description Accurate prediction of surface subsidence due to the extraction of underground coal seams is a significant challenge in geotechnical engineering. This task is further compounded by the growing trend for coal to be extracted from seams either above or below previously extracted coal seams, a practice known as multi-seam mining. In order to accurately predict the subsidence above single and multi-seam longwall panels using numerical methods, constitutive laws need to appropriately represent the mechanical behaviour of coal measure strata. The choice of the most appropriate model is not always straightforward. This paper compares predictions of surface subsidence obtained using the finite element method, considering a range of well-known constitutive models. The results show that more sophisticated and numerically taxing constitutive laws do not necessarily lead to more accurate predictions of subsidence when compared to field measurements. The advantages and limitations of using each particular constitutive law are discussed. A comparison of the numerical predictions and field measurements of surface subsidence is also provided.
topic Mining
Coal
Longwall mining
Subsidence
Multi-seam mining
Constitutive modelling
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775516000159
work_keys_str_mv AT amsuchowerskaiwanec geomechanicsofsubsidenceabovesingleandmultiseamcoalmining
AT jpcarter geomechanicsofsubsidenceabovesingleandmultiseamcoalmining
AT jphambleton geomechanicsofsubsidenceabovesingleandmultiseamcoalmining
_version_ 1725488971825283072