Informed consent: still a useful tool in research ethics - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v2.Sup1.208en

This article dicusses informed consent (IC): its evolution, its main challenges, and its theoretical assumptions. This process involves the interrelation of IC with the history and evolution of research ethics, and with some abuses committed in biomedical research. The article also presents the obje...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Florencia Luna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz) 2008-12-01
Series:RECIIS
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.reciis.cict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/208/184
id doaj-006aa489258d4d109cdb7680afdd9f9a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-006aa489258d4d109cdb7680afdd9f9a2021-05-02T04:16:18ZengInstituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)RECIIS1981-62782008-12-012Supp.Sup.41Sup.51Informed consent: still a useful tool in research ethics - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v2.Sup1.208enFlorencia LunaThis article dicusses informed consent (IC): its evolution, its main challenges, and its theoretical assumptions. This process involves the interrelation of IC with the history and evolution of research ethics, and with some abuses committed in biomedical research. The article also presents the objections to IC, especially those related to its implementation in developing countries. It also approaches the epistemological problems and those related to the capacity of acting, given the background conditions in which IC is obtained. Furthermore, the article exposes the traditional justification of IC as conveyed by the Belmont Report, as well as a frequent simplification of this justification that focuses only on the deliberative aspect of IC, in which the emphasis on the autonomy or deliberation supposes an inadequate view of research subjects.http://www.reciis.cict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/208/184informed consentassent formthe voluntary consentfree power of choiceautonomydeveloping countries
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Florencia Luna
spellingShingle Florencia Luna
Informed consent: still a useful tool in research ethics - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v2.Sup1.208en
RECIIS
informed consent
assent form
the voluntary consent
free power of choice
autonomy
developing countries
author_facet Florencia Luna
author_sort Florencia Luna
title Informed consent: still a useful tool in research ethics - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v2.Sup1.208en
title_short Informed consent: still a useful tool in research ethics - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v2.Sup1.208en
title_full Informed consent: still a useful tool in research ethics - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v2.Sup1.208en
title_fullStr Informed consent: still a useful tool in research ethics - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v2.Sup1.208en
title_full_unstemmed Informed consent: still a useful tool in research ethics - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v2.Sup1.208en
title_sort informed consent: still a useful tool in research ethics - doi: 10.3395/reciis.v2.sup1.208en
publisher Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)
series RECIIS
issn 1981-6278
publishDate 2008-12-01
description This article dicusses informed consent (IC): its evolution, its main challenges, and its theoretical assumptions. This process involves the interrelation of IC with the history and evolution of research ethics, and with some abuses committed in biomedical research. The article also presents the objections to IC, especially those related to its implementation in developing countries. It also approaches the epistemological problems and those related to the capacity of acting, given the background conditions in which IC is obtained. Furthermore, the article exposes the traditional justification of IC as conveyed by the Belmont Report, as well as a frequent simplification of this justification that focuses only on the deliberative aspect of IC, in which the emphasis on the autonomy or deliberation supposes an inadequate view of research subjects.
topic informed consent
assent form
the voluntary consent
free power of choice
autonomy
developing countries
url http://www.reciis.cict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/208/184
work_keys_str_mv AT florencialuna informedconsentstillausefultoolinresearchethicsdoi103395reciisv2sup1208en
_version_ 1721495364077355008