Implementation and evaluation of Stanford Health Care direct-care teledermatology program

Introduction: Teledermatology has proven to be an effective means of providing dermatologic care. The existing research has primarily evaluated its usefulness in a consultative model. Few academic centers have evaluated a patient-initiated model, and direct-to-consumer services remain the subject of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akhilesh S Pathipati, Justin M Ko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-07-01
Series:SAGE Open Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312116659089
id doaj-00c0263c537144618bfab869e22e1679
record_format Article
spelling doaj-00c0263c537144618bfab869e22e16792020-11-25T03:24:45ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open Medicine2050-31212016-07-01410.1177/205031211665908910.1177_2050312116659089Implementation and evaluation of Stanford Health Care direct-care teledermatology programAkhilesh S Pathipati0Justin M Ko1Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USADepartment of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USAIntroduction: Teledermatology has proven to be an effective means of providing dermatologic care. The existing research has primarily evaluated its usefulness in a consultative model. Few academic centers have evaluated a patient-initiated model, and direct-to-consumer services remain the subject of controversy. Stanford Health Care recently launched a direct-care, patient-initiated teledermatology pilot program. This article evaluates the viability and patient satisfaction with this service. Materials and Methods: During the pilot period, patients were able to seek remote dermatologic care using an eVisit tool in their MyHealth account. Patients initiated the consultation, answered questions regarding their complaint, and uploaded a picture if relevant. A Stanford dermatologist reviewed each eVisit and responded with an assessment and plan. The dermatologist noted whether they were able to make a diagnosis and their level of confidence in it. After the study, 10 patients participated in a focus group to provide feedback on the service. Results: In all, 38 patients sought care during the pilot period. A dermatologist was able to make a diagnosis in 36 of 38 (95%) cases, with an average confidence level of 7.9 of 10. The average time to consultation was 0.8 days. Patients indicated high levels of satisfaction with the service although they had suggestions for improvement. Discussion: Patients provided clinically useful images and information in a direct-care teledermatology model. Such services allow dermatology providers to increase access while maintaining high-quality care in an academic medical center. Further research is needed on standalone services that cannot integrate encounters with the patient’s existing medical record.https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312116659089
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Akhilesh S Pathipati
Justin M Ko
spellingShingle Akhilesh S Pathipati
Justin M Ko
Implementation and evaluation of Stanford Health Care direct-care teledermatology program
SAGE Open Medicine
author_facet Akhilesh S Pathipati
Justin M Ko
author_sort Akhilesh S Pathipati
title Implementation and evaluation of Stanford Health Care direct-care teledermatology program
title_short Implementation and evaluation of Stanford Health Care direct-care teledermatology program
title_full Implementation and evaluation of Stanford Health Care direct-care teledermatology program
title_fullStr Implementation and evaluation of Stanford Health Care direct-care teledermatology program
title_full_unstemmed Implementation and evaluation of Stanford Health Care direct-care teledermatology program
title_sort implementation and evaluation of stanford health care direct-care teledermatology program
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open Medicine
issn 2050-3121
publishDate 2016-07-01
description Introduction: Teledermatology has proven to be an effective means of providing dermatologic care. The existing research has primarily evaluated its usefulness in a consultative model. Few academic centers have evaluated a patient-initiated model, and direct-to-consumer services remain the subject of controversy. Stanford Health Care recently launched a direct-care, patient-initiated teledermatology pilot program. This article evaluates the viability and patient satisfaction with this service. Materials and Methods: During the pilot period, patients were able to seek remote dermatologic care using an eVisit tool in their MyHealth account. Patients initiated the consultation, answered questions regarding their complaint, and uploaded a picture if relevant. A Stanford dermatologist reviewed each eVisit and responded with an assessment and plan. The dermatologist noted whether they were able to make a diagnosis and their level of confidence in it. After the study, 10 patients participated in a focus group to provide feedback on the service. Results: In all, 38 patients sought care during the pilot period. A dermatologist was able to make a diagnosis in 36 of 38 (95%) cases, with an average confidence level of 7.9 of 10. The average time to consultation was 0.8 days. Patients indicated high levels of satisfaction with the service although they had suggestions for improvement. Discussion: Patients provided clinically useful images and information in a direct-care teledermatology model. Such services allow dermatology providers to increase access while maintaining high-quality care in an academic medical center. Further research is needed on standalone services that cannot integrate encounters with the patient’s existing medical record.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312116659089
work_keys_str_mv AT akhileshspathipati implementationandevaluationofstanfordhealthcaredirectcareteledermatologyprogram
AT justinmko implementationandevaluationofstanfordhealthcaredirectcareteledermatologyprogram
_version_ 1724600071993950208