On Hydronymic Catalogues Composition Principles: Cataloguing of Hydronyms of the Msta River Basin

The article presents a brief review of the few Russian hydronymic catalogues (relating to the basins of the Don, Oka, Svir and other rivers) based on the hydrographic principle. The authors argue that, in comparison with alphabetized hydronymic dictionaries, hydronymic catalogues have some obvious a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valery L. Vasilyev, Nina N. Vikhrova
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Izdatelstvo Uralskogo Universiteta 2015-06-01
Series:Voprosy Onomastiki
Subjects:
Online Access:http://onomastics.ru/sites/default/files/doi/10.15826/vopr_onom.2015.1.005.pdf
id doaj-00c3c7e52d96475393ba8053eaac0116
record_format Article
spelling doaj-00c3c7e52d96475393ba8053eaac01162020-11-24T22:41:46ZrusIzdatelstvo Uralskogo UniversitetaVoprosy Onomastiki1994-24001994-24512015-06-011218410710.15826/vopr_onom.2015.1.005On Hydronymic Catalogues Composition Principles: Cataloguing of Hydronyms of the Msta River BasinValery L. Vasilyev0Nina N. Vikhrova1Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State UniversityYaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State UniversityThe article presents a brief review of the few Russian hydronymic catalogues (relating to the basins of the Don, Oka, Svir and other rivers) based on the hydrographic principle. The authors argue that, in comparison with alphabetized hydronymic dictionaries, hydronymic catalogues have some obvious advantages for onomastic lexicography. This kind of catalogues should include, firstly, all historically attested forms of a hydronym (including those considered to be occasional miswritings) and, secondly, all non-hydronymic names making part of the respective hydronymic microsystem and providing “external” (i. e., chronological, derivational, etymological, ethno-historical) information about the hydronym. The authors point out that the cataloguing of hydronyms based on the hydrographic principle entails some difficulties: impossibility to localize some bodies of water mentioned in ancient and medieval documents; differences in the indication of the same bodies of water on old and contemporary maps; historical differences in establishing hydrographic hierarchies; historical changes of lake-river systems, etc. The authors also share their experience in creating a hydronymic catalogue of the Msta River basin in Novgorod and Tver Regions of Russia. They describe the principles of the composition of the catalogue and present a short excerpt of it that orders names in the system of the Volma River, one of the Msta’s left tributaries.http://onomastics.ru/sites/default/files/doi/10.15826/vopr_onom.2015.1.005.pdfRussian languagehydronymyhydrographyhydronymic cataloguesthe Msta River basin
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Valery L. Vasilyev
Nina N. Vikhrova
spellingShingle Valery L. Vasilyev
Nina N. Vikhrova
On Hydronymic Catalogues Composition Principles: Cataloguing of Hydronyms of the Msta River Basin
Voprosy Onomastiki
Russian language
hydronymy
hydrography
hydronymic catalogues
the Msta River basin
author_facet Valery L. Vasilyev
Nina N. Vikhrova
author_sort Valery L. Vasilyev
title On Hydronymic Catalogues Composition Principles: Cataloguing of Hydronyms of the Msta River Basin
title_short On Hydronymic Catalogues Composition Principles: Cataloguing of Hydronyms of the Msta River Basin
title_full On Hydronymic Catalogues Composition Principles: Cataloguing of Hydronyms of the Msta River Basin
title_fullStr On Hydronymic Catalogues Composition Principles: Cataloguing of Hydronyms of the Msta River Basin
title_full_unstemmed On Hydronymic Catalogues Composition Principles: Cataloguing of Hydronyms of the Msta River Basin
title_sort on hydronymic catalogues composition principles: cataloguing of hydronyms of the msta river basin
publisher Izdatelstvo Uralskogo Universiteta
series Voprosy Onomastiki
issn 1994-2400
1994-2451
publishDate 2015-06-01
description The article presents a brief review of the few Russian hydronymic catalogues (relating to the basins of the Don, Oka, Svir and other rivers) based on the hydrographic principle. The authors argue that, in comparison with alphabetized hydronymic dictionaries, hydronymic catalogues have some obvious advantages for onomastic lexicography. This kind of catalogues should include, firstly, all historically attested forms of a hydronym (including those considered to be occasional miswritings) and, secondly, all non-hydronymic names making part of the respective hydronymic microsystem and providing “external” (i. e., chronological, derivational, etymological, ethno-historical) information about the hydronym. The authors point out that the cataloguing of hydronyms based on the hydrographic principle entails some difficulties: impossibility to localize some bodies of water mentioned in ancient and medieval documents; differences in the indication of the same bodies of water on old and contemporary maps; historical differences in establishing hydrographic hierarchies; historical changes of lake-river systems, etc. The authors also share their experience in creating a hydronymic catalogue of the Msta River basin in Novgorod and Tver Regions of Russia. They describe the principles of the composition of the catalogue and present a short excerpt of it that orders names in the system of the Volma River, one of the Msta’s left tributaries.
topic Russian language
hydronymy
hydrography
hydronymic catalogues
the Msta River basin
url http://onomastics.ru/sites/default/files/doi/10.15826/vopr_onom.2015.1.005.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT valerylvasilyev onhydronymiccataloguescompositionprinciplescataloguingofhydronymsofthemstariverbasin
AT ninanvikhrova onhydronymiccataloguescompositionprinciplescataloguingofhydronymsofthemstariverbasin
_version_ 1725700882875547648