Degree of previous cutting in explaining the differences in diameter distributions between mature managed and natural Norway spruce forests

The degree of naturalness was assessed in 37 mature (stand age 80 198 yrs) Norway spruce dominated stands located in southern Finland by measuring the number (0 610 haâ1) and basal area (0 33 m2 haâ1) of cut stumps. The Johnsonâs SB distribution was fitted for living spruce trees to d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siipilehto, Jouni, Siitonen, Juha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Finnish Society of Forest Science 2004-01-01
Series:Silva Fennica
Online Access:https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/410
id doaj-00e640ae05c04a93be1a06436ac1b203
record_format Article
spelling doaj-00e640ae05c04a93be1a06436ac1b2032020-11-25T02:54:06ZengFinnish Society of Forest ScienceSilva Fennica2242-40752004-01-0138410.14214/sf.410Degree of previous cutting in explaining the differences in diameter distributions between mature managed and natural Norway spruce forestsSiipilehto, JouniSiitonen, Juha The degree of naturalness was assessed in 37 mature (stand age 80 198 yrs) Norway spruce dominated stands located in southern Finland by measuring the number (0 610 haâ1) and basal area (0 33 m2 haâ1) of cut stumps. The Johnsonâs SB distribution was fitted for living spruce trees to describe the dbh-frequency and basal area-dbh distributions. Regression models were constructed for predicting the parameters of the SB distribution using traditional stand parameters (median diameter, basal area, stem number) and the cut stump variables (number, basal area). Stump variables improved the models and enabled to explain the differences in diameter distributions between stands with varying intensity of past cutting. Model for basal area-dbh distribution was more accurate than dbh-frequency model in terms of regression statistics, but less accurate in terms of generated stand variables. The number and basal area of cut stumps seem to be useful and simple measures of stand naturalness which have potential uses in stand modelling and biodiversity-oriented forestry planning.https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/410
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Siipilehto, Jouni
Siitonen, Juha
spellingShingle Siipilehto, Jouni
Siitonen, Juha
Degree of previous cutting in explaining the differences in diameter distributions between mature managed and natural Norway spruce forests
Silva Fennica
author_facet Siipilehto, Jouni
Siitonen, Juha
author_sort Siipilehto, Jouni
title Degree of previous cutting in explaining the differences in diameter distributions between mature managed and natural Norway spruce forests
title_short Degree of previous cutting in explaining the differences in diameter distributions between mature managed and natural Norway spruce forests
title_full Degree of previous cutting in explaining the differences in diameter distributions between mature managed and natural Norway spruce forests
title_fullStr Degree of previous cutting in explaining the differences in diameter distributions between mature managed and natural Norway spruce forests
title_full_unstemmed Degree of previous cutting in explaining the differences in diameter distributions between mature managed and natural Norway spruce forests
title_sort degree of previous cutting in explaining the differences in diameter distributions between mature managed and natural norway spruce forests
publisher Finnish Society of Forest Science
series Silva Fennica
issn 2242-4075
publishDate 2004-01-01
description The degree of naturalness was assessed in 37 mature (stand age 80 198 yrs) Norway spruce dominated stands located in southern Finland by measuring the number (0 610 haâ1) and basal area (0 33 m2 haâ1) of cut stumps. The Johnsonâs SB distribution was fitted for living spruce trees to describe the dbh-frequency and basal area-dbh distributions. Regression models were constructed for predicting the parameters of the SB distribution using traditional stand parameters (median diameter, basal area, stem number) and the cut stump variables (number, basal area). Stump variables improved the models and enabled to explain the differences in diameter distributions between stands with varying intensity of past cutting. Model for basal area-dbh distribution was more accurate than dbh-frequency model in terms of regression statistics, but less accurate in terms of generated stand variables. The number and basal area of cut stumps seem to be useful and simple measures of stand naturalness which have potential uses in stand modelling and biodiversity-oriented forestry planning.
url https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/410
work_keys_str_mv AT siipilehtojouni degreeofpreviouscuttinginexplainingthedifferencesindiameterdistributionsbetweenmaturemanagedandnaturalnorwayspruceforests
AT siitonenjuha degreeofpreviouscuttinginexplainingthedifferencesindiameterdistributionsbetweenmaturemanagedandnaturalnorwayspruceforests
_version_ 1724722443685199872