RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER

The aim of this paper is to describe the rhetorical structure of the argumentative answer genre in a corpus formed by 15 compositions of the winter vestibular of Universidade Estadual de Maringá. The instrument of analysis used in the investigation was RST (Rhetorical Structure Theory). The initial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juliano Desiderato ANTONIO, Jackline Altoé dos SANTOS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Londrina 2014-12-01
Series:Signum: Estudos da Linguagem
Subjects:
RST
Online Access:http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/18325/15700
id doaj-00ff5f5015ec44c7bd9b1d0099514de7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-00ff5f5015ec44c7bd9b1d0099514de72020-11-24T21:30:34ZengUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaSignum: Estudos da Linguagem1516-30832237-48762014-12-01172193223RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWERJuliano Desiderato ANTONIO0Jackline Altoé dos SANTOS1Universidade Estadual de MaringáUniversidade Estadual de MaringáThe aim of this paper is to describe the rhetorical structure of the argumentative answer genre in a corpus formed by 15 compositions of the winter vestibular of Universidade Estadual de Maringá. The instrument of analysis used in the investigation was RST (Rhetorical Structure Theory). The initial statement was considered the central unit of the argumentative answer. Most of the writers held evidence relation between the central unit (nucleus) and the expansion (satellite). Evidence relation is interpersonal and the aim of the writers is to convince their addressees (in this case the compositions evaluation committee) that their point is correct. Within the initial statement, the relation with higher frequency was contrast. Our hypothesis is that the selection of texts of the test influenced the applicants to present positive and negative aspects of the internet. In the higher level of the expansion text span, list is the most frequent relation because the applicants present various arguments with the same status. Contrast was the second relation with highest frequency in this same level. Our hypothesis is that the selection of texts of the test influenced the applicants to present positive and negative aspects of the internet as it happened in the initial statement. Within the 15 compositions, 12 had a conclusion. This part was considered a satellite of the span formed by the initial statement and its expansion. The relation held was homonymous. http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/18325/15700RSTArgumentative answerSuperstructure
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Juliano Desiderato ANTONIO
Jackline Altoé dos SANTOS
spellingShingle Juliano Desiderato ANTONIO
Jackline Altoé dos SANTOS
RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER
Signum: Estudos da Linguagem
RST
Argumentative answer
Superstructure
author_facet Juliano Desiderato ANTONIO
Jackline Altoé dos SANTOS
author_sort Juliano Desiderato ANTONIO
title RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER
title_short RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER
title_full RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER
title_fullStr RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER
title_full_unstemmed RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER
title_sort rhetorical structure of argumentative answer
publisher Universidade Estadual de Londrina
series Signum: Estudos da Linguagem
issn 1516-3083
2237-4876
publishDate 2014-12-01
description The aim of this paper is to describe the rhetorical structure of the argumentative answer genre in a corpus formed by 15 compositions of the winter vestibular of Universidade Estadual de Maringá. The instrument of analysis used in the investigation was RST (Rhetorical Structure Theory). The initial statement was considered the central unit of the argumentative answer. Most of the writers held evidence relation between the central unit (nucleus) and the expansion (satellite). Evidence relation is interpersonal and the aim of the writers is to convince their addressees (in this case the compositions evaluation committee) that their point is correct. Within the initial statement, the relation with higher frequency was contrast. Our hypothesis is that the selection of texts of the test influenced the applicants to present positive and negative aspects of the internet. In the higher level of the expansion text span, list is the most frequent relation because the applicants present various arguments with the same status. Contrast was the second relation with highest frequency in this same level. Our hypothesis is that the selection of texts of the test influenced the applicants to present positive and negative aspects of the internet as it happened in the initial statement. Within the 15 compositions, 12 had a conclusion. This part was considered a satellite of the span formed by the initial statement and its expansion. The relation held was homonymous.
topic RST
Argumentative answer
Superstructure
url http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/18325/15700
work_keys_str_mv AT julianodesideratoantonio rhetoricalstructureofargumentativeanswer
AT jacklinealtoedossantos rhetoricalstructureofargumentativeanswer
_version_ 1725962787432169472