Do All Switches Cost the Same? Reliability of Language Switching and Mixing Costs

The current study examined the reliability and consistency of switching and mixing costs in the language and the color-shape tasks in three pre-existing data sets, to assess whether they are equally well suited for the study of individual differences. Specifically, we considered if the language task...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dorit Segal, Anat Prior, Tamar H. Gollan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/140
id doaj-01044f5b99a04d03904cb8d90bb54998
record_format Article
spelling doaj-01044f5b99a04d03904cb8d90bb549982021-02-11T07:01:18ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202021-01-014110.5334/joc.140150Do All Switches Cost the Same? Reliability of Language Switching and Mixing CostsDorit Segal0Anat Prior1Tamar H. Gollan2University of California, San DiegoUniversity of HaifaUniversity of California, San DiegoThe current study examined the reliability and consistency of switching and mixing costs in the language and the color-shape tasks in three pre-existing data sets, to assess whether they are equally well suited for the study of individual differences. Specifically, we considered if the language task is as reliable as the color-shape task – an important question given the wide use of language switching tasks but little information available to address this question. Switching costs had low to moderate reliability and internal consistency, and these were similar for the language and the color-shape tasks. Mixing costs were more reliable in the language task than in the color-shape task when tested twice on the same day and trended in the same direction when tested a week apart. In addition, mixing costs were larger and more consistent than switching costs in all data sets and they were also were more reliable than switching costs in the language task when tested on the same day. These results reveal the language task to be as good as the color-shape task for measuring switching and mixing ability. Low variability of switching costs may decrease their reliability and consistency, in turn interfering with the chance of detecting cross task correlations. We advocate for exploring procedures to increase the variability of switching costs, which might increase reliability and consistency of these measures, and improve the ability to determine if bilingual language use relies on cognitive mechanisms that overlap with those underlying nonlinguistic multi-tasking.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/140reliabilityvariabilitylanguage switchingcolor-shape switchingmulti-taskingbilingualism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dorit Segal
Anat Prior
Tamar H. Gollan
spellingShingle Dorit Segal
Anat Prior
Tamar H. Gollan
Do All Switches Cost the Same? Reliability of Language Switching and Mixing Costs
Journal of Cognition
reliability
variability
language switching
color-shape switching
multi-tasking
bilingualism
author_facet Dorit Segal
Anat Prior
Tamar H. Gollan
author_sort Dorit Segal
title Do All Switches Cost the Same? Reliability of Language Switching and Mixing Costs
title_short Do All Switches Cost the Same? Reliability of Language Switching and Mixing Costs
title_full Do All Switches Cost the Same? Reliability of Language Switching and Mixing Costs
title_fullStr Do All Switches Cost the Same? Reliability of Language Switching and Mixing Costs
title_full_unstemmed Do All Switches Cost the Same? Reliability of Language Switching and Mixing Costs
title_sort do all switches cost the same? reliability of language switching and mixing costs
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Journal of Cognition
issn 2514-4820
publishDate 2021-01-01
description The current study examined the reliability and consistency of switching and mixing costs in the language and the color-shape tasks in three pre-existing data sets, to assess whether they are equally well suited for the study of individual differences. Specifically, we considered if the language task is as reliable as the color-shape task – an important question given the wide use of language switching tasks but little information available to address this question. Switching costs had low to moderate reliability and internal consistency, and these were similar for the language and the color-shape tasks. Mixing costs were more reliable in the language task than in the color-shape task when tested twice on the same day and trended in the same direction when tested a week apart. In addition, mixing costs were larger and more consistent than switching costs in all data sets and they were also were more reliable than switching costs in the language task when tested on the same day. These results reveal the language task to be as good as the color-shape task for measuring switching and mixing ability. Low variability of switching costs may decrease their reliability and consistency, in turn interfering with the chance of detecting cross task correlations. We advocate for exploring procedures to increase the variability of switching costs, which might increase reliability and consistency of these measures, and improve the ability to determine if bilingual language use relies on cognitive mechanisms that overlap with those underlying nonlinguistic multi-tasking.
topic reliability
variability
language switching
color-shape switching
multi-tasking
bilingualism
url https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/140
work_keys_str_mv AT doritsegal doallswitchescostthesamereliabilityoflanguageswitchingandmixingcosts
AT anatprior doallswitchescostthesamereliabilityoflanguageswitchingandmixingcosts
AT tamarhgollan doallswitchescostthesamereliabilityoflanguageswitchingandmixingcosts
_version_ 1724274412201443328