Memory transition between communicating agents

What happens to a memory when it has been externalised and embodied but has not reached its addressee yet? A letter that has been written but has not been read, a monument before it is unveiled or a Neolithic tool buried in the ground – all these objects harbour human memories engrained in their phy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elena FELL
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Etudes Scientifiques Spécialisées Appliquées aux Communications Humaines, Economiques, Sociales et Symboliques 2012-01-01
Series:Essachess
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/181/163
id doaj-01089882c3464e6e87c010d11413f753
record_format Article
spelling doaj-01089882c3464e6e87c010d11413f7532021-08-02T09:53:06ZengEtudes Scientifiques Spécialisées Appliquées aux Communications Humaines, Economiques, Sociales et SymboliquesEssachess2066-50831775-352X2012-01-01510289309Memory transition between communicating agentsElena FELLWhat happens to a memory when it has been externalised and embodied but has not reached its addressee yet? A letter that has been written but has not been read, a monument before it is unveiled or a Neolithic tool buried in the ground – all these objects harbour human memories engrained in their physicality; messages intended for those who will read the letter, admire the monument and hold the tool. According to Ilyenkov’s theory of objective idealism, the conscious and wilful input encoded in all manmade objects as the ‘ideal’ has an objective existence, independent from the author, but this existence lasts only while memories are shared between communicating parties. If all human minds were absent from the world for a period of time, the ‘ideal’, or memories, would cease to exist. They would spring back to existence, however, once humans re-entered the world. Ilyenkov’s analysis of memories existing outside an individual human consciousness is informative and thorough but, following his line of thought, we would have to accept an ontological gap in the process of memory acquisition, storage and transmission. If there is a period, following memory acquisition and preceding its transmission, when memories plainly do not exist, then each time a new reader, spectator or user perceives them, he or she must create the author’s memories ex nihilo. Bergson’s theory of duration and intuition can help us to resolve this paradox.This paper will explore the ontological characteristics of memory passage in communication taken at different stages of the process. There will be an indication of how the findings of this investigation could be applicable to concrete cases of memory transmission. In particular, this concerns intergenerational communication, technological memory, the use of digital devices and the Internet.http://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/181/163Ilyenkovmemory transitionimagedigital devicesintergenerational communication
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elena FELL
spellingShingle Elena FELL
Memory transition between communicating agents
Essachess
Ilyenkov
memory transition
image
digital devices
intergenerational communication
author_facet Elena FELL
author_sort Elena FELL
title Memory transition between communicating agents
title_short Memory transition between communicating agents
title_full Memory transition between communicating agents
title_fullStr Memory transition between communicating agents
title_full_unstemmed Memory transition between communicating agents
title_sort memory transition between communicating agents
publisher Etudes Scientifiques Spécialisées Appliquées aux Communications Humaines, Economiques, Sociales et Symboliques
series Essachess
issn 2066-5083
1775-352X
publishDate 2012-01-01
description What happens to a memory when it has been externalised and embodied but has not reached its addressee yet? A letter that has been written but has not been read, a monument before it is unveiled or a Neolithic tool buried in the ground – all these objects harbour human memories engrained in their physicality; messages intended for those who will read the letter, admire the monument and hold the tool. According to Ilyenkov’s theory of objective idealism, the conscious and wilful input encoded in all manmade objects as the ‘ideal’ has an objective existence, independent from the author, but this existence lasts only while memories are shared between communicating parties. If all human minds were absent from the world for a period of time, the ‘ideal’, or memories, would cease to exist. They would spring back to existence, however, once humans re-entered the world. Ilyenkov’s analysis of memories existing outside an individual human consciousness is informative and thorough but, following his line of thought, we would have to accept an ontological gap in the process of memory acquisition, storage and transmission. If there is a period, following memory acquisition and preceding its transmission, when memories plainly do not exist, then each time a new reader, spectator or user perceives them, he or she must create the author’s memories ex nihilo. Bergson’s theory of duration and intuition can help us to resolve this paradox.This paper will explore the ontological characteristics of memory passage in communication taken at different stages of the process. There will be an indication of how the findings of this investigation could be applicable to concrete cases of memory transmission. In particular, this concerns intergenerational communication, technological memory, the use of digital devices and the Internet.
topic Ilyenkov
memory transition
image
digital devices
intergenerational communication
url http://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/181/163
work_keys_str_mv AT elenafell memorytransitionbetweencommunicatingagents
_version_ 1721234286598684672