Métaphore grammaticale : le nom en –ness, une création lexicale à usage unique

In this paper, –ness nominalization is interpreted as a case of grammatical metaphor, following recent cognitive approaches such as Langacker [2009], Panther et alii [2009]. –ness suffix is one of the most productive suffixes in the English language, because it is “transparent”: it allows the predic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Julie Neveux
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 2014-01-01
Series:Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/261
id doaj-01106e16ecc042c48af5771327646fb6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-01106e16ecc042c48af5771327646fb62020-11-25T01:08:40ZengUniversité Jean Moulin - Lyon 3Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology1951-62152014-01-01810.4000/lexis.261Métaphore grammaticale : le nom en –ness, une création lexicale à usage uniqueJulie NeveuxIn this paper, –ness nominalization is interpreted as a case of grammatical metaphor, following recent cognitive approaches such as Langacker [2009], Panther et alii [2009]. –ness suffix is one of the most productive suffixes in the English language, because it is “transparent”: it allows the predicative stem to remain fully perceptible within the derived noun. The decategorization process is thus perceptible, giving access to the speaker’s lexical creativity. –ness words are prototypically nonce-words, created by the speaker in a situation whose unique dimension (s)he needs to express; as in lexical metaphors, the transfer of symbolic traits (from the nominal category to the adjective one) leads to a form of concretization. Conceptual Metaphor Theory fails to take this fact into account: all metaphors are motivated by the search of a linguistic difference, which diminishes as metaphors get lexicalized and turn into structural, “conceptual” mapping. Prototypical metaphors are not pre-established cognitive projections. Metaphoricity and lexicalization are opposite evolutive processes.http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/261suffix –nessdecategorizationlexicalisationcreativitygrammatical metaphor
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julie Neveux
spellingShingle Julie Neveux
Métaphore grammaticale : le nom en –ness, une création lexicale à usage unique
Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology
suffix –ness
decategorization
lexicalisation
creativity
grammatical metaphor
author_facet Julie Neveux
author_sort Julie Neveux
title Métaphore grammaticale : le nom en –ness, une création lexicale à usage unique
title_short Métaphore grammaticale : le nom en –ness, une création lexicale à usage unique
title_full Métaphore grammaticale : le nom en –ness, une création lexicale à usage unique
title_fullStr Métaphore grammaticale : le nom en –ness, une création lexicale à usage unique
title_full_unstemmed Métaphore grammaticale : le nom en –ness, une création lexicale à usage unique
title_sort métaphore grammaticale : le nom en –ness, une création lexicale à usage unique
publisher Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3
series Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology
issn 1951-6215
publishDate 2014-01-01
description In this paper, –ness nominalization is interpreted as a case of grammatical metaphor, following recent cognitive approaches such as Langacker [2009], Panther et alii [2009]. –ness suffix is one of the most productive suffixes in the English language, because it is “transparent”: it allows the predicative stem to remain fully perceptible within the derived noun. The decategorization process is thus perceptible, giving access to the speaker’s lexical creativity. –ness words are prototypically nonce-words, created by the speaker in a situation whose unique dimension (s)he needs to express; as in lexical metaphors, the transfer of symbolic traits (from the nominal category to the adjective one) leads to a form of concretization. Conceptual Metaphor Theory fails to take this fact into account: all metaphors are motivated by the search of a linguistic difference, which diminishes as metaphors get lexicalized and turn into structural, “conceptual” mapping. Prototypical metaphors are not pre-established cognitive projections. Metaphoricity and lexicalization are opposite evolutive processes.
topic suffix –ness
decategorization
lexicalisation
creativity
grammatical metaphor
url http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/261
work_keys_str_mv AT julieneveux metaphoregrammaticalelenomennessunecreationlexicaleausageunique
_version_ 1725182081833631744