COVID-19 exposure risk for family members of healthcare workers: An observational study

Background: Many publications have considered the exposure risk to COVID-19 of the general population and healthcare workers. However, no available papers have discussed the risk of exposure by family members of health care workers. Aims: The present study collected data on SARS-COV-2 positive famil...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dioscoridi Lorenzo, Chiara Carrisi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-09-01
Series:International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220305415
id doaj-0131b36b0a074128817f388b0d151ba4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0131b36b0a074128817f388b0d151ba42020-11-25T01:58:55ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases1201-97122020-09-0198287289COVID-19 exposure risk for family members of healthcare workers: An observational studyDioscoridi Lorenzo0Chiara Carrisi1Corresponding author.; Santagostino Medical Center, Piazza Sant’Agostino 1, 20100 Milan, ItalySantagostino Medical Center, Piazza Sant’Agostino 1, 20100 Milan, ItalyBackground: Many publications have considered the exposure risk to COVID-19 of the general population and healthcare workers. However, no available papers have discussed the risk of exposure by family members of health care workers. Aims: The present study collected data on SARS-COV-2 positive family members (FM) of health care workers (HW) using serological rapid IgM/IgG tests (SRT), compared to positive HWs on SRT and serological quantitative IgG tests (SQT). Methods: The study was conducted from May 2 to 31, 2020. Thirty-eight HWs were tested by both SRT and SQT; 81 FMs were screened using SRT. Descriptive statistical analyses were used to summarize the data. Results: Of the 38 HWs, two (5,3%) showed an IgG line on SRT, confirmed by SQT. Thirty-two HWs decided on self-isolation from the family during the SARS-COV-2 spread. Out of 81 FMs, 26 (32,1%) were found IgG positive on SRT. Eleven (42%) of them had symptoms typical for COVID-19, during the study period. In two families, the HWs were the only negative cases. Conclusions: The general population's exposure to COVID-19 is less controlled than that of HWs. HWs experienced a lower infection rate than their families and did not represent a main transmission risk for relatives.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220305415COVID-19SARS-COV-2Infection of healthcare workersRapid serological test
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dioscoridi Lorenzo
Chiara Carrisi
spellingShingle Dioscoridi Lorenzo
Chiara Carrisi
COVID-19 exposure risk for family members of healthcare workers: An observational study
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
COVID-19
SARS-COV-2
Infection of healthcare workers
Rapid serological test
author_facet Dioscoridi Lorenzo
Chiara Carrisi
author_sort Dioscoridi Lorenzo
title COVID-19 exposure risk for family members of healthcare workers: An observational study
title_short COVID-19 exposure risk for family members of healthcare workers: An observational study
title_full COVID-19 exposure risk for family members of healthcare workers: An observational study
title_fullStr COVID-19 exposure risk for family members of healthcare workers: An observational study
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 exposure risk for family members of healthcare workers: An observational study
title_sort covid-19 exposure risk for family members of healthcare workers: an observational study
publisher Elsevier
series International Journal of Infectious Diseases
issn 1201-9712
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Background: Many publications have considered the exposure risk to COVID-19 of the general population and healthcare workers. However, no available papers have discussed the risk of exposure by family members of health care workers. Aims: The present study collected data on SARS-COV-2 positive family members (FM) of health care workers (HW) using serological rapid IgM/IgG tests (SRT), compared to positive HWs on SRT and serological quantitative IgG tests (SQT). Methods: The study was conducted from May 2 to 31, 2020. Thirty-eight HWs were tested by both SRT and SQT; 81 FMs were screened using SRT. Descriptive statistical analyses were used to summarize the data. Results: Of the 38 HWs, two (5,3%) showed an IgG line on SRT, confirmed by SQT. Thirty-two HWs decided on self-isolation from the family during the SARS-COV-2 spread. Out of 81 FMs, 26 (32,1%) were found IgG positive on SRT. Eleven (42%) of them had symptoms typical for COVID-19, during the study period. In two families, the HWs were the only negative cases. Conclusions: The general population's exposure to COVID-19 is less controlled than that of HWs. HWs experienced a lower infection rate than their families and did not represent a main transmission risk for relatives.
topic COVID-19
SARS-COV-2
Infection of healthcare workers
Rapid serological test
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220305415
work_keys_str_mv AT dioscoridilorenzo covid19exposureriskforfamilymembersofhealthcareworkersanobservationalstudy
AT chiaracarrisi covid19exposureriskforfamilymembersofhealthcareworkersanobservationalstudy
_version_ 1724967252776714240