Symptomatic spinal metastasis: A systematic literature review of the preoperative prognostic factors for survival, neurological, functional and quality of life in surgically treated patients and methodological recommendations for prognostic studies.

PURPOSE:While several clinical prediction rules (CPRs) of survival exist for patients with symptomatic spinal metastasis (SSM), these have variable prognostic ability and there is no recognized CPR for health related quality of life (HRQoL). We undertook a critical appraisal of the literature to ide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anick Nater, Allan R Martin, Arjun Sahgal, David Choi, Michael G Fehlings
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5321441?pdf=render
id doaj-017361a22adc47098d187b8b7e7ec39e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-017361a22adc47098d187b8b7e7ec39e2020-11-25T02:48:44ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01122e017150710.1371/journal.pone.0171507Symptomatic spinal metastasis: A systematic literature review of the preoperative prognostic factors for survival, neurological, functional and quality of life in surgically treated patients and methodological recommendations for prognostic studies.Anick NaterAllan R MartinArjun SahgalDavid ChoiMichael G FehlingsPURPOSE:While several clinical prediction rules (CPRs) of survival exist for patients with symptomatic spinal metastasis (SSM), these have variable prognostic ability and there is no recognized CPR for health related quality of life (HRQoL). We undertook a critical appraisal of the literature to identify key preoperative prognostic factors of clinical outcomes in patients with SSM who were treated surgically. The results of this study could be used to modify existing or develop new CPRs. METHODS:Seven electronic databases were searched (1990-2015), without language restriction, to identify studies that performed multivariate analysis of preoperative predictors of survival, neurological, functional and HRQoL outcomes in surgical patients with SSM. Individual studies were assessed for class of evidence. The strength of the overall body of evidence was evaluated using GRADE for each predictor. RESULTS:Among 4,818 unique citations, 17 were included; all were in English, rated Class III and focused on survival, revealing a total of 46 predictors. The strength of the overall body of evidence was very low for 39 and low for 7 predictors. Due to considerable heterogeneity in patient samples and prognostic factors investigated as well as several methodological issues, our results had a moderately high risk of bias and were difficult to interpret. CONCLUSIONS:The quality of evidence for predictors of survival was, at best, low. We failed to identify studies that evaluated preoperative prognostic factors for neurological, functional, or HRQoL outcomes in surgical patients with SSM. We formulated methodological recommendations for prognostic studies to promote acquiring high-quality evidence to better estimate predictor effect sizes to improve patient education, surgical decision-making and development of CPRs.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5321441?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anick Nater
Allan R Martin
Arjun Sahgal
David Choi
Michael G Fehlings
spellingShingle Anick Nater
Allan R Martin
Arjun Sahgal
David Choi
Michael G Fehlings
Symptomatic spinal metastasis: A systematic literature review of the preoperative prognostic factors for survival, neurological, functional and quality of life in surgically treated patients and methodological recommendations for prognostic studies.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Anick Nater
Allan R Martin
Arjun Sahgal
David Choi
Michael G Fehlings
author_sort Anick Nater
title Symptomatic spinal metastasis: A systematic literature review of the preoperative prognostic factors for survival, neurological, functional and quality of life in surgically treated patients and methodological recommendations for prognostic studies.
title_short Symptomatic spinal metastasis: A systematic literature review of the preoperative prognostic factors for survival, neurological, functional and quality of life in surgically treated patients and methodological recommendations for prognostic studies.
title_full Symptomatic spinal metastasis: A systematic literature review of the preoperative prognostic factors for survival, neurological, functional and quality of life in surgically treated patients and methodological recommendations for prognostic studies.
title_fullStr Symptomatic spinal metastasis: A systematic literature review of the preoperative prognostic factors for survival, neurological, functional and quality of life in surgically treated patients and methodological recommendations for prognostic studies.
title_full_unstemmed Symptomatic spinal metastasis: A systematic literature review of the preoperative prognostic factors for survival, neurological, functional and quality of life in surgically treated patients and methodological recommendations for prognostic studies.
title_sort symptomatic spinal metastasis: a systematic literature review of the preoperative prognostic factors for survival, neurological, functional and quality of life in surgically treated patients and methodological recommendations for prognostic studies.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description PURPOSE:While several clinical prediction rules (CPRs) of survival exist for patients with symptomatic spinal metastasis (SSM), these have variable prognostic ability and there is no recognized CPR for health related quality of life (HRQoL). We undertook a critical appraisal of the literature to identify key preoperative prognostic factors of clinical outcomes in patients with SSM who were treated surgically. The results of this study could be used to modify existing or develop new CPRs. METHODS:Seven electronic databases were searched (1990-2015), without language restriction, to identify studies that performed multivariate analysis of preoperative predictors of survival, neurological, functional and HRQoL outcomes in surgical patients with SSM. Individual studies were assessed for class of evidence. The strength of the overall body of evidence was evaluated using GRADE for each predictor. RESULTS:Among 4,818 unique citations, 17 were included; all were in English, rated Class III and focused on survival, revealing a total of 46 predictors. The strength of the overall body of evidence was very low for 39 and low for 7 predictors. Due to considerable heterogeneity in patient samples and prognostic factors investigated as well as several methodological issues, our results had a moderately high risk of bias and were difficult to interpret. CONCLUSIONS:The quality of evidence for predictors of survival was, at best, low. We failed to identify studies that evaluated preoperative prognostic factors for neurological, functional, or HRQoL outcomes in surgical patients with SSM. We formulated methodological recommendations for prognostic studies to promote acquiring high-quality evidence to better estimate predictor effect sizes to improve patient education, surgical decision-making and development of CPRs.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5321441?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT anicknater symptomaticspinalmetastasisasystematicliteraturereviewofthepreoperativeprognosticfactorsforsurvivalneurologicalfunctionalandqualityoflifeinsurgicallytreatedpatientsandmethodologicalrecommendationsforprognosticstudies
AT allanrmartin symptomaticspinalmetastasisasystematicliteraturereviewofthepreoperativeprognosticfactorsforsurvivalneurologicalfunctionalandqualityoflifeinsurgicallytreatedpatientsandmethodologicalrecommendationsforprognosticstudies
AT arjunsahgal symptomaticspinalmetastasisasystematicliteraturereviewofthepreoperativeprognosticfactorsforsurvivalneurologicalfunctionalandqualityoflifeinsurgicallytreatedpatientsandmethodologicalrecommendationsforprognosticstudies
AT davidchoi symptomaticspinalmetastasisasystematicliteraturereviewofthepreoperativeprognosticfactorsforsurvivalneurologicalfunctionalandqualityoflifeinsurgicallytreatedpatientsandmethodologicalrecommendationsforprognosticstudies
AT michaelgfehlings symptomaticspinalmetastasisasystematicliteraturereviewofthepreoperativeprognosticfactorsforsurvivalneurologicalfunctionalandqualityoflifeinsurgicallytreatedpatientsandmethodologicalrecommendationsforprognosticstudies
_version_ 1724747015928152064