An evaluation of coverage and compliance of mass drug administration 2006 for elimination of lymphatic filariasis in endemic areas of Gujarat

<b>Background:</b> Mass drug administration (MDA) means once-in-a-year administration of diethyl carbamazine (DEC) tablet to all people (excluding children under 2 years, pregnant women and severely ill persons) in identified endemic areas. It aims at cessation of transmission of lympha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kumar Pradeep, Prajapati P, Saxena Deepak, Kavishwar Abhay, Kurian George
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2008-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Community Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijcm.org.in/article.asp?issn=0970-0218;year=2008;volume=33;issue=1;spage=38;epage=42;aulast=Kumar
id doaj-019dd9cfdce848d58e0233a575bf02ed
record_format Article
spelling doaj-019dd9cfdce848d58e0233a575bf02ed2020-11-24T22:43:25ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Community Medicine0970-02182008-01-013313842An evaluation of coverage and compliance of mass drug administration 2006 for elimination of lymphatic filariasis in endemic areas of GujaratKumar PradeepPrajapati PSaxena DeepakKavishwar AbhayKurian George<b>Background:</b> Mass drug administration (MDA) means once-in-a-year administration of diethyl carbamazine (DEC) tablet to all people (excluding children under 2 years, pregnant women and severely ill persons) in identified endemic areas. It aims at cessation of transmission of lymphatic filariasis. <b> Objective:</b> What has been the coverage and compliance of MDA in Gujarat during the campaign in December 2006? <b> Study Design:</b> Cross-sectional population based house-to-house visit. <b> Setting:</b> Urban and rural areas in Gujarat identified as endemic for filariasis where MDA 2006 was undertaken. <b> Study Variables:</b> <i> Exploratory</i> - Rural and urban districts; <i> Outcome</i> - coverage, compliance, actual coverage, side effects. <b> Analysis:</b> Percentage and proportions. <b> Results:</b> Twenty-six clusters, each comprising 32 households from six endemic districts, yielded an eligible population of 4164. The coverage rate was 85.2&#x0025; with variation across different areas. The compliance with drug ingestion was 89&#x0025; with a gap of 11&#x0025; to be targeted by intensive IEC. The effective coverage (75.8&#x0025;) was much below the target (85&#x0025;). Side effects of DEC were minimum, transient and drug-specific. Overall coverage was marginally better in rural areas. The causes of poor coverage and compliance have been discussed and relevant suggestions have been made.http://www.ijcm.org.in/article.asp?issn=0970-0218;year=2008;volume=33;issue=1;spage=38;epage=42;aulast=KumarLymphatic filariasismass drug administration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kumar Pradeep
Prajapati P
Saxena Deepak
Kavishwar Abhay
Kurian George
spellingShingle Kumar Pradeep
Prajapati P
Saxena Deepak
Kavishwar Abhay
Kurian George
An evaluation of coverage and compliance of mass drug administration 2006 for elimination of lymphatic filariasis in endemic areas of Gujarat
Indian Journal of Community Medicine
Lymphatic filariasis
mass drug administration
author_facet Kumar Pradeep
Prajapati P
Saxena Deepak
Kavishwar Abhay
Kurian George
author_sort Kumar Pradeep
title An evaluation of coverage and compliance of mass drug administration 2006 for elimination of lymphatic filariasis in endemic areas of Gujarat
title_short An evaluation of coverage and compliance of mass drug administration 2006 for elimination of lymphatic filariasis in endemic areas of Gujarat
title_full An evaluation of coverage and compliance of mass drug administration 2006 for elimination of lymphatic filariasis in endemic areas of Gujarat
title_fullStr An evaluation of coverage and compliance of mass drug administration 2006 for elimination of lymphatic filariasis in endemic areas of Gujarat
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of coverage and compliance of mass drug administration 2006 for elimination of lymphatic filariasis in endemic areas of Gujarat
title_sort evaluation of coverage and compliance of mass drug administration 2006 for elimination of lymphatic filariasis in endemic areas of gujarat
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Community Medicine
issn 0970-0218
publishDate 2008-01-01
description <b>Background:</b> Mass drug administration (MDA) means once-in-a-year administration of diethyl carbamazine (DEC) tablet to all people (excluding children under 2 years, pregnant women and severely ill persons) in identified endemic areas. It aims at cessation of transmission of lymphatic filariasis. <b> Objective:</b> What has been the coverage and compliance of MDA in Gujarat during the campaign in December 2006? <b> Study Design:</b> Cross-sectional population based house-to-house visit. <b> Setting:</b> Urban and rural areas in Gujarat identified as endemic for filariasis where MDA 2006 was undertaken. <b> Study Variables:</b> <i> Exploratory</i> - Rural and urban districts; <i> Outcome</i> - coverage, compliance, actual coverage, side effects. <b> Analysis:</b> Percentage and proportions. <b> Results:</b> Twenty-six clusters, each comprising 32 households from six endemic districts, yielded an eligible population of 4164. The coverage rate was 85.2&#x0025; with variation across different areas. The compliance with drug ingestion was 89&#x0025; with a gap of 11&#x0025; to be targeted by intensive IEC. The effective coverage (75.8&#x0025;) was much below the target (85&#x0025;). Side effects of DEC were minimum, transient and drug-specific. Overall coverage was marginally better in rural areas. The causes of poor coverage and compliance have been discussed and relevant suggestions have been made.
topic Lymphatic filariasis
mass drug administration
url http://www.ijcm.org.in/article.asp?issn=0970-0218;year=2008;volume=33;issue=1;spage=38;epage=42;aulast=Kumar
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarpradeep anevaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
AT prajapatip anevaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
AT saxenadeepak anevaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
AT kavishwarabhay anevaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
AT kuriangeorge anevaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
AT kumarpradeep evaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
AT prajapatip evaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
AT saxenadeepak evaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
AT kavishwarabhay evaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
AT kuriangeorge evaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
_version_ 1725696019941818368